• 1.

    Anderson RB, Aronson LR, Drobatz KJ, Atilla A. Prognostic factors for successful outcome following urethral rupture in dogs and cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2006;42(2):136146.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Halfacree ZJ, Tivers MS, Brockman DJ. Vaginourethroplasty as a salvage procedure for management of traumatic urethral rupture in a cat. J Feline Med Surg. 2011;13(10):768771.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Lee D-E, Kim K-C, Jeong S-W, Yoon H-Y. Reconstruction of urethral defects using a fascia lata autograft in a dog. J Vet Med Sci. 2019;81(2):237240.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Addison ES, Halfacree Z, Moore AH, Demetriou J, Parsons K, Tivers M. A retrospective analysis of urethral rupture in 63 cats. J Feline Med Surg. 2014;16(4):300307.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Boothe HW. Managing traumatic urethral injuries. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract. 2000;15(1):3539.

  • 6.

    Aumann M, Worth LT, Drobatz KJ. Uroperitoneum in cats: 26 cases (1986–1995). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1998;34(4):315324.

  • 7.

    Holt PE. Hindlimb skin loss associated with urethral rupture in two cats. J Small Anim Pract. 1989;30(7)406409.

  • 8.

    Meige F, Sarrau S, Autefage A. Management of traumatic urethral rupture in 11 cats using primary alignment with a urethral catheter. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2008;21(1):7684.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Balakrishnan A, Drobatz KJ. Management of urinary tract emergencies in small animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2013;43(4):843867.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Cuddy LC, Mcalinden AB. The urethra. In: Johnston SA, Tobias KM, eds. Veterinary Surgery: Small Animal. Vol 2. 2nd ed. Elsevier Saunders; 2018:22342253.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Carbone MG. Urethral surgery in the cat. Vet Clin North Am. 1971;1(2):281298.

  • 12.

    McRoberts JW, Ragde H. The severed canine posterior urethra: a study of two distinct methods of repair. J Urol. 1970;104(5):724729.

  • 13.

    Bradley RL. Prepubic urethrostomy. An acceptable urinary diversion technique. Probl Vet Med. 1989;1(1):120127.

  • 14.

    Mendham JH. A description and evaluation of antepubic urethrostomy in the male cat. J Small Anim Pract. 1970;11(11):709721.

  • 15.

    Gaber E, El-Khamary A, Abdelwahed R. Tube cystostomy vs bladder marsupialization: clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation in dogs. Alex J Vet Sci. 2014;42(1):1627.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Hunter BG, Huber MJ, Riddick TL. Laparoscopic-assisted urinary bladder marsupialization in a goat that developed recurrent urethral obstruction following perineal urethrostomy. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2012;241(6):778781.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    May KA, Moll HD, Duncan RB, Moon MM, Pleasant RS, Howard RD. Experimental evaluation of urinary bladder marsupialization in male goats. Vet Surg. 2002;31(3):251258.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Baines SJ, Rennie S, White RS. Prepubic urethrostomy: a long-term study in 16 cats. Vet Surg. 2001;30(2):107113.

  • 19.

    Atalan G, Ci̇han M, Sozmen M, Ozaydin I. Repair of urethral defects using fascia lata autografts in dogs. Vet Surg. 2005;34(5):514518.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Webster GD, Brown MW, Koefoot RB Jr, Sihelnick S. Suboptimal results in full thickness skin graft urethroplasty using an extrapenile skin donor site. J Urol. 1984;131(6):10821083.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Vincent MP, Horton CE, Devine CJ Jr. An evaluation of skin grafts for reconstruction of the penis and scrotum. Clin Plast Surg. 1988;15(3):411424.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Ransley PG, Duffy P, Oesch IL, Van Oyen P, Hoover D. The use of bladder mucosa and combined bladder mucosa/preputial skin grafts for urethral reconstruction. J Urol. 1987;138(4 pt 2):10961098.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Kinkead TM, Borzi PA, Duffy PG, Ransley PG. Long-term followup of bladder mucosa graft for male urethral reconstruction. J Urol. 1994;151(4):10561058.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Kropp BP, Ludlow JK, Spicer D, et al. Rabbit urethral regeneration using small intestinal submucosa onlay grafts. Urology. 1998;52(1):138142.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Powers MY, Campbell BG, Weisse C. Porcine small intestinal submucosa augmentation urethroplasty and balloon dilatation of a urethral stricture secondary to inadvertent prostatectomy in a dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2010;46(5):358365.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Khoury AE, Olson ME, McLorie GA, Churchill BM. Urethral replacement with tunica vaginalis: a pilot study. J Urol. 1989;142(2 pt 2):628630.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Shaul DB, Xie HW, Diaz JF, Mahnovski V, Hardy BE. Use of tubularized peritoneal free grafts as urethral substitutes in the rabbit. J Pediatr Surg. 1996;31(2):225228.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Lebret T, Gobet F, Dallaserra M, Mitrofanoff P. Use of a digestive mucosal graft in urethroplasty. Eur Urol. 1995;27(1):5861.

  • 29.

    Frang D, Furka I, Köves S. Urethral replacement with autologous venous graft: an experimental study in the dog. Urol Res. 1982;10(3):145147.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Paulo NM, Fischer P, Matos MP, et al. Experimental substitution urethroplasty in dogs using homologous segments of carotid artery maintained in glycerol. Ciȇnc Anim Bras. 2000;1(1):6571.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Dubey D, Kumar A, Mandhani A, Srivastava A, Kapoor R, Bhandari M. Buccal mucosal urethroplasty: a versatile technique for all urethral segments. BJU Int. 2005;95(4):625629.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Maarouf AM, Elsayed ER, Ragab A, et al. Buccal versus lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty for complex hypospadias repair. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9(6 pt A):754758.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Bhargava S, Chapple CR. Buccal mucosal urethroplasty: is it the new gold standard? BJU Int. 2004;93(9):11911193.

  • 34.

    Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, O'Leary MP, et al. The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. J Urol. 1992;148(5):15491557.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Cockett ATK, Aso Y, Denis L. Recommendations of the International Consensus Committee concerning Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Quality of Life Assessment. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Consultation on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). International Consensus Committee; 1993:553555.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Stone EA, Barsanti JA. Urologic surgery of the dog and cat. In: Surgical Therapy for Urethral Obstruction in Dogs. Lea & Febiger; 1992:149156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Zemer O, Benzioni H, Kaplan R, et al. Evaluation of crural release and ischial osteotomy for relief of tension in the repair of large segmental urethral defects in male cats. Vet Surg. 2013;42(8):971978.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Gearhart JP, Peppas DS, Jeffs RD. Complications of paraexstrophy skin flaps in the reconstruction of classical bladder exstrophy. J Urol. 1993;150(2 pt 2):627630.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    Li LC, Zhang X, Zhou SW, Zhou XC, Yang WM, Zhang YS. Experience with repair of hypospadias using bladder mucosa in adolescents and adults. J Urol. 1995;153(4):11171119.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40.

    Mehrsai A, Djaladat H, Sina A, Salem S, Pourmand G. Buccal mucosal graft in repeat urethroplasty. Urol J. 2005;2(4):206210.

  • 41.

    Elkassaby A, Kotb M. Management of anterior urethral strictures with buccal mucosa: our pioneering experience. Afr J Urol. 2016;22(1):2432.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    El-Sherbiny MT, Abol-Enein H, Dawaba MS, Ghoneim MA. Treatment of urethral defects: skin, buccal or bladder mucosa, tube or patch? An experimental study in dogs. J Urol. 2002;167(5):22252228.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43.

    Pansadoro V, Emiliozzi P. Which urethroplasty for which results? Curr Opin Urol. 2002;12(3):223227.

  • 44.

    Muruganandam K, Dubey D, Gulia AK, et al. Closure versus nonclosure of buccal mucosal graft harvest site: a prospective randomized study on post operative morbidity. Indian J Urol. 2009;25(1):7275.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45.

    Fabbroni G, Loukota RA, Eardley I. Buccal mucosal grafts for urethroplasty: surgical technique and morbidity. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;43(4):320323.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46.

    Kamp S, Knoll T, Osman M, Häcker A, Michel MS, Alken P. Donor-site morbidity in buccal mucosa urethroplasty: lower lip or inner cheek? BJU Int. 2005;96(4):619623.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47.

    Jang TL, Erickson B, Medendorp A, Gonzalez CM. Comparison of donor site intraoral morbidity after mucosal graft harvesting for urethral reconstruction. Urology. 2005;66(4):716720.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48.

    Tolstunov L, Pogrel MA, McAninch JW. Intraoral morbidity following free buccal mucosal graft harvesting for urethroplasty. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;84(5):480482.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49.

    Badawy AA, Abolyosr A, Saleem MD, Abuzeid AM. Buccal mucosa graft for ureteral stricture substitution: initial experience. Urology. 2010;76(4):971975.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50.

    Andrich D, Mundy A. Surgery for urethral stricture disease. Contemp Urol. 2001;13:3240.

  • 51.

    Andrich DE, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR. The problems of penile urethroplasty with particular reference to 2-stage reconstructions. J Urol. 2003;170(1):8789.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52.

    Andrich DE, Mundy AR. What is the best technique for urethroplasty? Eur Urol. 2008;54(5):10311041.

  • 53.

    Calfee EF III, Lanz OI, Degner DA, et al. Microvascular free tissue transfer of the rectus abdominis muscle in dogs. Vet Surg. 2002;31(1):3243.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54.

    Degner DA, Walshaw R, Arnoczky SP, et al. Evaluation of the cranial rectus abdominus muscle pedicle flap as a blood supply for the caudal superficial epigastric skin flap in dogs. Vet Surg. 1996;25(4):292299.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 55.

    Miller JM, Lanz OI, Degner DA. Rectus abdominis free muscle flap for reconstruction in nine dogs. Vet Surg. 2007;36(3):259265.

Buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in male cats with traumatic complete urethral rupture

View More View Less
  • 1 Kasetsart University Veterinary Teaching Hospital Hua Hin, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Prachuap Khiri Khan, Thailand
  • | 2 Veterinary Research and Academic Service, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
  • | 3 Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany
  • | 4 Veterinary Surgery, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for repairing complete urethral rupture in cats.

ANIMALS

15 male domestic shorthair cats with traumatic complete urethral rupture.

PROCEDURES

In each cat, a section of buccal mucosa was harvested, sutured, and formed into a tubule by use of an 8F indwelling catheter as support. This tubular graft was connected to both ruptured ends of the urethra to renew the urinary passage. The catheter was left in place until the absence of leakage was confirmed by positive contrast retrograde urethrography. After spontaneous urination was confirmed, cats were discharged from the hospital. Six months later, urethrography was repeated and owners were asked to score their cats’ urinary function and quality of life.

RESULTS

13 cats recovered well following surgery, with no complications in the oral cavity or surgical site and no signs of difficulty or discomfort when urinating. Urethrography 2 weeks and 6 months after surgery revealed no stricture or leakage in the abdominal cavity. The 2 remaining cats developed a urethral stricture and underwent second surgery with a successful outcome. At the 6-month follow-up, 14 cats had only mild urinary signs, and 1 cat had incontinency. Owners indicated they were delighted (n = 14) or pleased (1) with their cats’ quality of life.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Buccal mucosa was found to be a good source of graft tissue for performance of urethroplasty in male cats, yielding satisfactory outcomes with few postoperative complications. The described technique may be suitable for severe and complicated cases of urethral rupture in male cats.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility of buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for repairing complete urethral rupture in cats.

ANIMALS

15 male domestic shorthair cats with traumatic complete urethral rupture.

PROCEDURES

In each cat, a section of buccal mucosa was harvested, sutured, and formed into a tubule by use of an 8F indwelling catheter as support. This tubular graft was connected to both ruptured ends of the urethra to renew the urinary passage. The catheter was left in place until the absence of leakage was confirmed by positive contrast retrograde urethrography. After spontaneous urination was confirmed, cats were discharged from the hospital. Six months later, urethrography was repeated and owners were asked to score their cats’ urinary function and quality of life.

RESULTS

13 cats recovered well following surgery, with no complications in the oral cavity or surgical site and no signs of difficulty or discomfort when urinating. Urethrography 2 weeks and 6 months after surgery revealed no stricture or leakage in the abdominal cavity. The 2 remaining cats developed a urethral stricture and underwent second surgery with a successful outcome. At the 6-month follow-up, 14 cats had only mild urinary signs, and 1 cat had incontinency. Owners indicated they were delighted (n = 14) or pleased (1) with their cats’ quality of life.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Buccal mucosa was found to be a good source of graft tissue for performance of urethroplasty in male cats, yielding satisfactory outcomes with few postoperative complications. The described technique may be suitable for severe and complicated cases of urethral rupture in male cats.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplementary Table S1 (PDF 93 KB)

Contributor Notes

Corresponding author: Dr. Yippaditr (kpswcy@ku.ac.th)