Emesis induction is successful for recovery of gastric foreign objects in cats

Christiana Fischer Department of Clinical Studies and Advanced Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Search for other papers by Christiana Fischer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 VMD, DACVECC
,
Nolan Chalifoux Department of Clinical Studies and Advanced Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Search for other papers by Nolan Chalifoux in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
, and
Erica Reineke Department of Clinical Studies and Advanced Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Search for other papers by Erica Reineke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 VMD, DACVECC

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively assess the efficacy of emesis induction for the recovery of gastric foreign objects in cats and to determine if any factors influenced recovery.

ANIMALS

22 client-owned cats.

PROCEDURES

Cats for which emesis induction was deemed appropriate were administered an emetic agent by the attending clinician between October 2018 and April 2021. Data collected included whether emesis was successful in recovery in some or all of the foreign object, time from administration to emesis, number of emetic events, and type, length, width, and surface area of the material ingested.

RESULTS

Of the 22 cats that had emesis attempted, 11 (50%) vomited some or all of the foreign object. The time from ingestion to presentation, time from the last meal, presence of food in the vomitus, type of the object, and length, width, and surface area of the object did not influence the likelihood of successful recovery with emesis induction. The most common object cats ingested were rubber bands.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Recovery of gastric foreign objects in cats with emesis induction alone may be successful 50% of the time. The type and size of the object is unlikely to influence whether or not emesis will be successful. This information can help prepare cat-owners for expectations and outcomes following attempts at emesis induction.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively assess the efficacy of emesis induction for the recovery of gastric foreign objects in cats and to determine if any factors influenced recovery.

ANIMALS

22 client-owned cats.

PROCEDURES

Cats for which emesis induction was deemed appropriate were administered an emetic agent by the attending clinician between October 2018 and April 2021. Data collected included whether emesis was successful in recovery in some or all of the foreign object, time from administration to emesis, number of emetic events, and type, length, width, and surface area of the material ingested.

RESULTS

Of the 22 cats that had emesis attempted, 11 (50%) vomited some or all of the foreign object. The time from ingestion to presentation, time from the last meal, presence of food in the vomitus, type of the object, and length, width, and surface area of the object did not influence the likelihood of successful recovery with emesis induction. The most common object cats ingested were rubber bands.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Recovery of gastric foreign objects in cats with emesis induction alone may be successful 50% of the time. The type and size of the object is unlikely to influence whether or not emesis will be successful. This information can help prepare cat-owners for expectations and outcomes following attempts at emesis induction.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplementary Table S1 (PDF 135 KB)

Contributor Notes

Corresponding author: Dr. Fischer (chrissyfischer5@gmail.com)
  • 1.

    Thawley VJ, Drobatz KJ. Assessment of dexmedetomidine and other agents for emesis induction in cats: 43 cases (2009-2014). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2015;247(12):1415-1418. doi:10.2460/javma.247.12.1415

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Willey JL, Julius TM, Claypool SP, Clare MC. Evaluation and comparison of xylazine hydrochloride and dexmedetomidine hydrochloride for the induction of emesis in cats: 47 cases (2007-2013). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2016;248(8):923-928. doi:10.2460/javma.248.8.923

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Thies M, Bracker K, Sinnott V. Retrospective evaluation of the effectiveness of xylazine for inducing emesis in cats: 48 cats (2011-2015). J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2017;27(6):658-661. doi:10.1111/vec.12641

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Nystrom MR, Odunayo A, Okafor CC. Assessment of hydromorphone and dexmedetomidine for emesis induction in cats. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2019;29(4):360-365. doi:10.1111/vec.12866

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Colby ED, McCarthy LE, Borison HL. Emetic action of xylazine on the chemoreceptor trigger zone for vomiting in cats. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 1981;4(2):93-96. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2885.1981.tb00716.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Plumb DC. Hydromorphone. Plumb’s Veterinary Drugs. Accessed February 26, 2023. https://app.plumbs.com/drug-monograph/UvzrLrOaaCPROD?source=search&searchQuery=hydromorphone

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Kirchofer KS, Block G, Johnson JA. Efficacy of intravenous administration of apomorphine for removal of gastric foreign material in dogs: 495 cases (2010-2015). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2019;255(4):459-465. doi:10.2460/javma.255.4.459

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Khan SA, McLean MK, Slater M, Hansen S, Zawistowski S. Effectiveness and adverse effects of the use of apomorphine and 3% hydrogen peroxide solution to induce emesis in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2012;241(9):1179-1184. doi:10.2460/javma.241.9.1179

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement