On-site communication skills education increases client-centered communication in four companion animal practices

Natasha Janke Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO

Search for other papers by Natasha Janke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Jane R. Shaw Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO

Search for other papers by Jane R. Shaw in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
Jason B. Coe Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada

Search for other papers by Jason B. Coe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate veterinarian-client communication before and after a 15-month on-site communication skills training intervention.

PROCEDURES

Multipractice, pretest-posttest intervention study.

SAMPLE

A convenience sample of 4 companion animal practices owned by a single practice group in Austin, Texas (n = 9 veterinarians; 170 audio recordings).

RESULTS

After intervention, visits were 8 minutes longer (P = .005), and veterinarians’ client-centered scores increased significantly (2.30 vs 2.72; P = .006). Veterinarians’ biomedical questions decreased by nearly a third (P = .0007), while veterinarians’ facilitation (ie, partnership-building) statements were 1.15 times as great (P = .04) after intervention due to an increase in asking for the client’s opinion (P = .03) and use of back-channel statements (P = .01). Agenda-setting skills, including agenda-setting questions (P = .009), summary of the client’s agenda (P = < .0001), and a check for remaining concerns (P = .013), increased significantly after intervention. Clients asked 1.9 times as many lifestyle-social related questions (P = .02) and provided 1.3 times as much lifestyle-social information (P = .0004) after the intervention. Additionally, clients offered 1.4 times as many emotion-handling statements (P = .0001), including showing concern (P = .03) and optimism, reassurance, or encouragement (P < .0001), after intervention. Paraverbally, clients presented as more anxious/nervous (P = .03) and emotionally distressed/upset (P = .02) after the intervention.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Results suggest that client-centered communication skills increased after intervention. This study builds upon previous case-based studies examining practice-based communication training, emphasizing that long-term interventions positively enhance veterinarian-client communication, which is likely to have a positive impact on client and patient care.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate veterinarian-client communication before and after a 15-month on-site communication skills training intervention.

PROCEDURES

Multipractice, pretest-posttest intervention study.

SAMPLE

A convenience sample of 4 companion animal practices owned by a single practice group in Austin, Texas (n = 9 veterinarians; 170 audio recordings).

RESULTS

After intervention, visits were 8 minutes longer (P = .005), and veterinarians’ client-centered scores increased significantly (2.30 vs 2.72; P = .006). Veterinarians’ biomedical questions decreased by nearly a third (P = .0007), while veterinarians’ facilitation (ie, partnership-building) statements were 1.15 times as great (P = .04) after intervention due to an increase in asking for the client’s opinion (P = .03) and use of back-channel statements (P = .01). Agenda-setting skills, including agenda-setting questions (P = .009), summary of the client’s agenda (P = < .0001), and a check for remaining concerns (P = .013), increased significantly after intervention. Clients asked 1.9 times as many lifestyle-social related questions (P = .02) and provided 1.3 times as much lifestyle-social information (P = .0004) after the intervention. Additionally, clients offered 1.4 times as many emotion-handling statements (P = .0001), including showing concern (P = .03) and optimism, reassurance, or encouragement (P < .0001), after intervention. Paraverbally, clients presented as more anxious/nervous (P = .03) and emotionally distressed/upset (P = .02) after the intervention.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Results suggest that client-centered communication skills increased after intervention. This study builds upon previous case-based studies examining practice-based communication training, emphasizing that long-term interventions positively enhance veterinarian-client communication, which is likely to have a positive impact on client and patient care.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 899 0 0
Full Text Views 1489 1312 343
PDF Downloads 649 465 19
Advertisement