Psychological implications of humane endings on the veterinary profession

Nathaniel S. Kollias Animal Welfare Division, AVMA, Schaumburg, IL

Search for other papers by Nathaniel S. Kollias in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Elizabeth B. Strand College of Veterinary Medicine and College of Social Work, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN

Search for other papers by Elizabeth B. Strand in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Lori R. Kogan College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO

Search for other papers by Lori R. Kogan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Kendall E. Houlihan Animal Welfare Division, AVMA, Schaumburg, IL

Search for other papers by Kendall E. Houlihan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Sally Thompson-Iritani University of Washington, Seattle WA

Search for other papers by Sally Thompson-Iritani in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Donald E. Hoenig MIM Consulting, Belfast, ME

Search for other papers by Donald E. Hoenig in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 VMD
,
Zenithson Y. Ng College of Veterinary Medicine and College of Social Work, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN

Search for other papers by Zenithson Y. Ng in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
, and
Lynette A. Hart School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA

Search for other papers by Lynette A. Hart in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD

Abstract

The veterinary profession has a unique responsibility to animals during the final stages of their lives. The veterinarian’s obligations extend to humane endings, involving all species of animals in a range of circumstances including, but not limited to, euthanasia of individually owned animals, euthanasia of animals for research purposes, depopulation of animals during emergencies, and slaughter of animals raised for food. The veterinary profession continues to improve animal welfare through advances in end-of-life decision-making and humane killing techniques,1–3 but the psychological impacts on veterinarians have not received the same level of consideration. Building on the influential AVMA Humane Endings Guideline, the AVMA recognizes that support for the mental health of veterinarians engaged in such activities needs to be a priority. This article aims to provide the foundation and rationale for improved preparation and establishment of sustainable mental health resources and to offer recommendations on pragmatic solutions to support and prepare veterinary professionals as leaders impacted by participation in humane endings–related activities. While end-of-life decision-making and implementation may present mental health challenges to veterinarians, it is crucial to recognize that there are stressors specific to each situation and that every individual’s experience is valid. Addressing the mental health issues surrounding the decision-making process and implementation of humane endings activities start with a comprehensive understanding of each activity’s unique context and the veterinarian’s leadership role. Therefore, this article highlights the psychological impact of depopulation and its similarities and exclusive challenges compared with euthanasia and humane slaughter.

Abstract

The veterinary profession has a unique responsibility to animals during the final stages of their lives. The veterinarian’s obligations extend to humane endings, involving all species of animals in a range of circumstances including, but not limited to, euthanasia of individually owned animals, euthanasia of animals for research purposes, depopulation of animals during emergencies, and slaughter of animals raised for food. The veterinary profession continues to improve animal welfare through advances in end-of-life decision-making and humane killing techniques,1–3 but the psychological impacts on veterinarians have not received the same level of consideration. Building on the influential AVMA Humane Endings Guideline, the AVMA recognizes that support for the mental health of veterinarians engaged in such activities needs to be a priority. This article aims to provide the foundation and rationale for improved preparation and establishment of sustainable mental health resources and to offer recommendations on pragmatic solutions to support and prepare veterinary professionals as leaders impacted by participation in humane endings–related activities. While end-of-life decision-making and implementation may present mental health challenges to veterinarians, it is crucial to recognize that there are stressors specific to each situation and that every individual’s experience is valid. Addressing the mental health issues surrounding the decision-making process and implementation of humane endings activities start with a comprehensive understanding of each activity’s unique context and the veterinarian’s leadership role. Therefore, this article highlights the psychological impact of depopulation and its similarities and exclusive challenges compared with euthanasia and humane slaughter.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 984 0 0
Full Text Views 6447 5210 161
PDF Downloads 1548 705 51
Advertisement