Oil-based compounding flavors more accepted by feline patients

Amy E. Nichelason Department of Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI

Search for other papers by Amy E. Nichelason in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, DABVP
,
Kelly K. Schultz Department of Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI

Search for other papers by Kelly K. Schultz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
Alyssa J. Bernard UW Veterinary Care, Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI

Search for other papers by Alyssa J. Bernard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PharmD, MS
,
Juliet E. Caviness Department of Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI

Search for other papers by Juliet E. Caviness in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MA
, and
Elizabeth E. Alvarez Department of Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI

Search for other papers by Elizabeth E. Alvarez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, DABVP

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the voluntary acceptance of 10 commercially available compounding flavors in cats.

ANIMALS

46 healthy cats between 1 and 12 years of age.

PROCEDURES

Each cat underwent a 14-day study period consisting of a 4-day acclimation period followed by a 10-day trial period in which each cat was randomly offered 10 different compounding flavors. Owners completed a presurvey along with a daily observation logbook. Kits, including residual amounts of flavors, were returned and weighed to determine residual weight and calculate the amount ingested.

RESULTS

Overall, cats did not voluntarily accept most of the compounding flavors; 58.8% (124/211) and 84.5% (267/311) of offered samples of oil-based and water-based compounding flavors, respectively, were rejected or minimally accepted. Cats were significantly (P < .001) more likely to accept oil-based flavors, compared to water-based flavors. The sweet water-based flavors were least accepted, compared to water-based control and water-based savory flavors (P = .040 and P < .001, respectively). Owner-perceived acceptance was moderately correlated with residual flavor weights (Kendall tau [τ] = –0.466; P < .001). Owners were not able to accurately predict which flavors their cats would accept.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Cats should be offered oil-based compounding flavorings when available, whereas water-based sweet flavorings should be avoided. Owner perception of acceptance is a valid metric to assess flavor acceptance, which can be used in future studies evaluating flavor acceptance. Owners may not accurately predict their cats’ flavor preferences, limiting their ability to guide optimal flavor selection.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the voluntary acceptance of 10 commercially available compounding flavors in cats.

ANIMALS

46 healthy cats between 1 and 12 years of age.

PROCEDURES

Each cat underwent a 14-day study period consisting of a 4-day acclimation period followed by a 10-day trial period in which each cat was randomly offered 10 different compounding flavors. Owners completed a presurvey along with a daily observation logbook. Kits, including residual amounts of flavors, were returned and weighed to determine residual weight and calculate the amount ingested.

RESULTS

Overall, cats did not voluntarily accept most of the compounding flavors; 58.8% (124/211) and 84.5% (267/311) of offered samples of oil-based and water-based compounding flavors, respectively, were rejected or minimally accepted. Cats were significantly (P < .001) more likely to accept oil-based flavors, compared to water-based flavors. The sweet water-based flavors were least accepted, compared to water-based control and water-based savory flavors (P = .040 and P < .001, respectively). Owner-perceived acceptance was moderately correlated with residual flavor weights (Kendall tau [τ] = –0.466; P < .001). Owners were not able to accurately predict which flavors their cats would accept.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Cats should be offered oil-based compounding flavorings when available, whereas water-based sweet flavorings should be avoided. Owner perception of acceptance is a valid metric to assess flavor acceptance, which can be used in future studies evaluating flavor acceptance. Owners may not accurately predict their cats’ flavor preferences, limiting their ability to guide optimal flavor selection.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplementary Appendix S1 (PDF 510 KB)
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1727 0 0
Full Text Views 1584 1126 260
PDF Downloads 1114 579 35
Advertisement