Editorial Type:
Scientific Reports

Perspectives on and prevalence of ticks and tick-borne diseases in Alaskan veterinary clinics

Gale Disler Institute for Circumpolar Health Studies, University of Alaska, Anchorage, AK

Search for other papers by Gale Disler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
 MPH
,
Renate Schlaht Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO

Search for other papers by Renate Schlaht in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
 UAF/CSU DVM
, and
Micah B. Hahn Institute for Circumpolar Health Studies, University of Alaska, Anchorage, AK

Search for other papers by Micah B. Hahn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
 PhD, MPH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.22.04.0162
Volume/Issue:
Volume 261: Issue 1
Online Publication Date:
03 Aug 2022
Restricted access
Sign In Reprints and Permissions Purchase Article

Abstract

Objective

To assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of veterinary personnel and pet owners regarding ticks and tick-borne diseases in Alaska and to conduct a serosurvey for tick-borne disease pathogens among domestic animals visiting veterinary clinics for preventative care.

Sample

Across 8 veterinary clinics, we sampled 31 veterinary personnel, 81 pet owners, 102 client-owned dogs, and 1 client-owned cat.

Procedures

Information on KAP among veterinary staff and pet owners was collected via self-administered questionnaires. Tick and tick-borne disease prevalence were assessed via tick checks and benchtop ELISA antibody tests detecting Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Anaplasma platys, Erlichia canis, Erlichia ewingii, and Borrelia burgdorferi.

Results

The veterinary personnel KAP survey showed a low average knowledge score (53.5%) but a moderate attitude score (71.7%). In contrast, owner average knowledge score was higher (67.5%) and attitude score was comparatively low (50.6%). Both veterinary personnel and owners had low average practice scores (64.5% and 56.3%, respectively). One dog was positive for anaplasmosis (unknown species) antibody, and 1 dog was positive for B burgdorferi antibody. No ticks were found during the study.

Clinical Relevance

This study was the first of its kind in the state and indicated a low prevalence of ticks and tick-borne diseases in the domestic pet population and highlighted significant knowledge gaps that could be targeted by public health efforts. Our results suggest the value of a One Health approach and of the veterinary-client relationship to address ticks and tick-borne diseases.

Abstract

Objective

To assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of veterinary personnel and pet owners regarding ticks and tick-borne diseases in Alaska and to conduct a serosurvey for tick-borne disease pathogens among domestic animals visiting veterinary clinics for preventative care.

Sample

Across 8 veterinary clinics, we sampled 31 veterinary personnel, 81 pet owners, 102 client-owned dogs, and 1 client-owned cat.

Procedures

Information on KAP among veterinary staff and pet owners was collected via self-administered questionnaires. Tick and tick-borne disease prevalence were assessed via tick checks and benchtop ELISA antibody tests detecting Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Anaplasma platys, Erlichia canis, Erlichia ewingii, and Borrelia burgdorferi.

Results

The veterinary personnel KAP survey showed a low average knowledge score (53.5%) but a moderate attitude score (71.7%). In contrast, owner average knowledge score was higher (67.5%) and attitude score was comparatively low (50.6%). Both veterinary personnel and owners had low average practice scores (64.5% and 56.3%, respectively). One dog was positive for anaplasmosis (unknown species) antibody, and 1 dog was positive for B burgdorferi antibody. No ticks were found during the study.

Clinical Relevance

This study was the first of its kind in the state and indicated a low prevalence of ticks and tick-borne diseases in the domestic pet population and highlighted significant knowledge gaps that could be targeted by public health efforts. Our results suggest the value of a One Health approach and of the veterinary-client relationship to address ticks and tick-borne diseases.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplementary Table S1 (PDF 175 KB)
    • Supplementary Table S2 (PDF 129 KB)
    • Supplementary Table S3 (PDF 138 KB)
    • Supplementary Table S4 (PDF 159 KB)

Contributor Notes

Corresponding author: Dr. Hahn (mbhahn@alaska.edu)
Cover Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Publication Date:
03 Aug 2022
  • 1.

    Wikel SK. Ticks and tick-borne infections: complex ecology, agents, and host interactions. Vet Sci. 2018;5(2):60. doi:10.3390/vetsci5020060

  • 2.

    Brites-Neto J, Duarte KMR, Martins TF. Tick-borne infections in human and animal population worldwide. Vet World. 2015;8(3):301–315. doi:10.14202/vetworld.2015.301-315

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Shaw SE, Day MJ, Birtles RJ, Breitschwerdt EB. Tick-borne infectious diseases of dogs. Trends Parasitol. 2001;17(2):74–80. doi:10.1016/s1471-4922(00)01856-0

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Sonenshine DE. Range expansion of tick disease vectors in North America: implications for spread of tick-borne disease. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(3):478. doi:10.3390/ijerph15030478

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Madhav NK, Brownstein JS, Tsao JI, Fish D. A dispersal model for the range expansion of blacklegged tick (Acari: Ixodidae). J Med Entomol. 2004;41(5):842–852. doi: 10.1603/0022-2585-41.5.842

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Durden LA, Beckmen KB, Gerlach RF. New records of ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) from dogs, cats, humans, and some wild vertebrates in Alaska: invasion potential. J Med Entomol. 2016;53(6):1391–1395. doi:10.1093/jme/tjw128

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Hahn MB, Disler G, Durden LA, et al. Establishing a baseline for tick surveillance in Alaska: tick collection records from 1909–2019. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2020;11(5):101495. doi:10.1016/j.ttbdis.2020.101495

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Tickborne diseases. State of Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Health. Accessed January 15, 2022. https://dec.alaska.gov/eh/vet/ticks/tickborne-diseases/

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Dantas-Torres F, Chomel BB, Otranto D. Ticks and tick-borne diseases: a One Health perspective. Trends Parasitol. 2012;28(10):437–46. doi:10.1016/j.pt.2012.07.003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    What does a small animal vet do? Exploring a pet doctor’s role. St. George’s University Veterinary Medicine Blog. Published March 8, 2019. Accessed January 15, 2022. https://www.sgu.edu/blog/veterinary/what-does-a-small-animal-vet-do/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Bard AM, Main DCJ, Haase AM, Whay HR, Roe EJ, Reyher KK. The future of veterinary communication: partnership or persuasion? A qualitative investigation of veterinary communication in the pursuit of client behaviour change. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0171380. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171380

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Janke N, Coe JB, Bernardo TM, Dewey CE, Stone EA. Pet owners’ and veterinarians’ perceptions of information exchange and clinical decision-making in companion animal practice. PLoS One. 2021;16(2):e0245632. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0245632

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Niesobecki S, Hansen A, Rutz H, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding tick-borne disease prevention in endemic areas. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2019;10(6):101264. doi:10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.07.008

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Zöldi V, Turunen T, Lyytikäinen O, Sane J. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding ticks and tick-borne diseases, Finland. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2017;8(6):872–877. doi:10.1016/j.ttbdis.2017.07.004

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Riccò M, Gualerzi G, Ranzieri S, Ferraro P, Bragazzi NL. Knowledge, attitudes, practices (KAP) of Italian occupational physicians towards tick borne encephalitis. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2020;5(3):117. doi:10.3390/tropicalmed5030117

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    How to check your pet for ticks. US Department of Health and Human Services CDC. Published June 18, 2018.10.1111/ipd.12012 Accessed June 9, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/healthypets/publications/check-pet-for-ticks.html

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Bloom BS. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Handbook 1: The Cognitive Domain. McKay; 1956.

  • 18.

    Tickborne diseases of the United States: a reference manual for healthcare providers. US Department of Health and Human Services CDC. Accessed January 1, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/ticks/tickbornediseases/TickborneDiseases-P.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Preventing ticks on your pets. US Department of Health and Human Services CDC. Published December 21, 2018. Accessed January 1, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/prev/on_pets.html

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Elsheikha H. Control of fleas, ticks and worms in companion animals. Vet Times (Peterb). 2016;46(3):6–9

  • 21.

    Gates MC, Nolan TJ. Factors influencing heartworm, flea, and tick preventative use in patients presenting to a veterinary teaching hospital. Prev Vet Med. 2010;93(2-3):193–200. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.10.012

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Lavan RP, Tunceli K, Zhang D, Normile D, Armstrong R. Assessment of dog owner adherence to veterinarians’ flea and tick prevention recommendations in the United States using a cross-sectional survey. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10(1):284. doi:10.1186/s13071-017-2217-2

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Nichol GK, Weese JS, Evason M, Clow KM. Assessing knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Canadian veterinarians with regard to Lyme disease in dogs. J Vet Intern Med. 2021;35(1):294–302. doi:10.1111/jvim.16022

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Vladimirov LN, Machakhtyrov GN, Machakhtyrova VA, et al. Quantifying the northward spread of ticks (ixodida) as climate warms in northern Russia. Atmosphere (Basel). 2021;12(2):233. doi:10.3390/atmos12020233

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Damrow T, Freedman SH, Washington R, et al. Is Ixodes (ixodiopsis) angustus a vector of Lyme disease in Washington State? West J Med. 1989;150(5):580–582

  • 26.

    Mani RJ, Morton RJ, Clinkenbeard KD. Ecology of tularemia in central US endemic region. Curr Trop Med Rep. 2016;3(3):75–79. doi:10.1007/s40475-016-0075-1

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Sakamoto JM. Progress, challenges, and the role of public engagement to improve tick-borne disease literacy. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2018;28:81–89. doi:10.1016/j.cois.2018.05.011

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement