Analysis of patient outcome and owner satisfaction with double limb amputations: 14 dogs and four cats

Steven R. Magidenko Hospital for Animals, Small Animal Surgery Section, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY

Search for other papers by Steven R. Magidenko in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BS
,
Nathan W. Peterson Hospital for Animals, Emergency and Critical Care Section, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY

Search for other papers by Nathan W. Peterson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, DACVECC
,
Guido Pisano Centro Veterinario Pisani, Carli, Chiodo Luni Mare, Luni SP, Italy

Search for other papers by Guido Pisano in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
, and
Nicole J. Buote Hospital for Animals, Small Animal Surgery Section, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY

Search for other papers by Nicole J. Buote in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, DACVS—Small Animal

Click on author name to view affiliation information

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the indications for, complications of, and surgical outcomes of dogs and cats that were treated with double limb amputations.

ANIMALS

14 dogs and 4 cats that underwent double limb amputations.

PROCEDURES

Data collected retrospectively included patient-specific (species, age, weight, breed, sex, existing comorbidities) and amputation-specific (indication for amputation, full or partial limb amputation, associated complications, need for revision surgeries) variables. Owner satisfaction scores were also collected.

RESULTS

The most common indication for double amputations was trauma (12/18) patients. Eleven patients had both amputations performed simultaneously. Nine patients had double partial limb amputations versus full limb amputations. Twelve patients underwent bilateral pelvic limb amputations, 4 underwent bilateral thoracic limb amputations, and 2 had 1 pelvic and 1 contralateral thoracic limb amputated. Five patients had reported complications over the course of the follow-up period, and complications for 3 patients were considered major. Revision surgery was reported for 2 animals. Owner satisfaction scores were reported as very satisfied/excellent (14/18), mildly satisfied (3/18), and strongly dissatisfied (1/18). Median time to follow-up was 450 days (range, 85 to 4,380 days).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Double limb amputation may be a viable alternative to advanced limb-sparing procedures or humane euthanasia based on the owner satisfaction data and the relatively low rate of major complications in this study. Future studies should clarify patient selection criteria and differences in function between surgical types.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the indications for, complications of, and surgical outcomes of dogs and cats that were treated with double limb amputations.

ANIMALS

14 dogs and 4 cats that underwent double limb amputations.

PROCEDURES

Data collected retrospectively included patient-specific (species, age, weight, breed, sex, existing comorbidities) and amputation-specific (indication for amputation, full or partial limb amputation, associated complications, need for revision surgeries) variables. Owner satisfaction scores were also collected.

RESULTS

The most common indication for double amputations was trauma (12/18) patients. Eleven patients had both amputations performed simultaneously. Nine patients had double partial limb amputations versus full limb amputations. Twelve patients underwent bilateral pelvic limb amputations, 4 underwent bilateral thoracic limb amputations, and 2 had 1 pelvic and 1 contralateral thoracic limb amputated. Five patients had reported complications over the course of the follow-up period, and complications for 3 patients were considered major. Revision surgery was reported for 2 animals. Owner satisfaction scores were reported as very satisfied/excellent (14/18), mildly satisfied (3/18), and strongly dissatisfied (1/18). Median time to follow-up was 450 days (range, 85 to 4,380 days).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Double limb amputation may be a viable alternative to advanced limb-sparing procedures or humane euthanasia based on the owner satisfaction data and the relatively low rate of major complications in this study. Future studies should clarify patient selection criteria and differences in function between surgical types.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplementary Table S1 (PDF 131 KB)
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1272 0 0
Full Text Views 2312 1526 159
PDF Downloads 1743 673 53
Advertisement