• 1.

    Ellwood PM. Shattuck lecture—outcomes management. A technology of patient experience. N Engl J Med. 1988;318(23):15491556. doi:10.1056/NEJM198806093182327

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Porter M, Lee TH. The strategy that will fix health care. Harvard Business Review. October 2013. Accessed September 16, 2021. https://hbr.org/2013/10/the-strategy-that-will-fix-health-care

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Clancy CM, Eisenberg JM. Outcomes research: measuring the end results of health care. Science. 1998;282(5387):245246. doi:10.1126/science.282.5387.245

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    US pet ownership and demographic sourcebook. 2017–2018 edition. AVMA. Accessed September 16, 2021. https://www.avma.org/sites/default/files/resources/AVMA-Pet-Demographics-Executive-Summary.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Pet industry market size, trends & ownership statistics. American Pet Products Association. Accessed May 6, 2021. https://www.americanpetproducts.org/press_industrytrends.asp

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Friedman E, Krause-Parello CA. Companion animals and human health: benefits, challenges, and the road ahead for human-animal interaction. Rev Sci Tech. 2018;37(1):7182. doi:10.20506/rst.37.1.2741

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Beetz A, Uvnäs-Moberg K, Julius H, Kotrschal K. Psychosocial and psychophysiological effects of human-animal interactions: the possible role of oxytocin. Front Psychol. 2012;3:234. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00234

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Morgan L, Protopopova A, Dupont Birker RI, et al. Human-dog relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic: booming dog adoption during social isolation. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2020;7:155. doi:10.1057/s41599–020–00649-x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Ratschen E, Shoesmith E, Shahab L, et al. Human-animal relationships and interactions during the Covid-19 lockdown phase in the UK: investigating links with mental health and loneliness. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0239397. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239397

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Are pet adoptions really skyrocketing? AVMA. Accessed May 6, 2021. https://www.avma.org/javma-news/2021–01–15/are-pet-adoptions-really-skyrocketing

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Burgos Cáceres S. The roles of veterinarians in meeting the challenges of health and welfare of livestock and global food security. Vet Res Forum. 2012;3(3):155157.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    The roles of veterinarians in meeting the challenges of health and welfare of livestock and global food security. Animal Production and Health. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Accessed May 5, 2021. www.fao.org/ag/againfo/home/en/news_archive/2011_The_roles_of_veterinarians.html

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Lenarduzzi R, Sheppard GA, Slater MR. Factors influencing the choice of a career in food-animal practice among recent graduates and current students of Texas A&M University, College of Veterinary Medicine. J Vet Med Educ. 2009;36(1):715. doi:10.3138/jvme.36.1.7

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Rural veterinary care. AVMA. Accessed June 3, 2021. https://www.avma.org/advocacy/rural-veterinary-care

  • 15.

    Stull JW, Shelby JA, Bonnett BN, et al. Barriers and next steps to providing a spectrum of effective health care to companion animals. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2018;253(11):13861389. doi:10.2460/javma.253.11.1386

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Volk JO, Felsted KE, Thomas JG, Siren CW. Executive summary of the Bayer veterinary care usage study. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2011;238(10):12751282. doi:10.2460/javma.238.10.1275

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Kipperman BS, Kass PH, Rishniw M. Factors that influence small animal veterinarians’ opinions and actions regarding cost of care and effects of economic limitations on patient care and outcome and professional career satisfaction and burnout. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2017;250(7):785794. doi:10.2460/javma.250.7.785

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Coe JB, Adams CL, Bonnett BN. A focus group study of veterinarians’ and pet owners’ perceptions of the monetary aspects of veterinary care. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2007;231(10):15101518. doi:10.2460/javma.231.10.1510

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Jensen KL, English BC, Menard RJ, Holland RE. Livestock producers’ views on accessing food-animal veterinary services: implications for student recruitment, training, and practice management. J Vet Med Educ. 2009;36(1):3038. doi:10.3138/jvme.36.1.30

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Pires AFA, Peterson A, Baron JN, Adams R, Martínez-López B, Moore D. Small-scale and backyard livestock owners needs assessment in the western United States. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0212372. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212372

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Jefford M, Stockler MR, Tattersall MHN. Outcomes research: what is it and why does it matter? Intern Med J. 2003;33(3):110118. doi:10.1046/j.1445-5994.2003.00302.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Karakiewicz PI, Briganti A, Chun FKH, Valiquette L. Outcomes research: a methodologic review. Eur Urol. 2006;50(2):218224. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.05.009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Poulsen Nautrup B, Van Vlaenderen I. Cost-effectiveness of Pimobendan versus Benazepril in acquired myxomatous mitral valve disease in dogs: an adaptation to Switzerland. Value Health. 2009;12(3):A62. Abstract.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Van Vlaenderen I, Nautrup BP, Gasper SM. Estimation of the clinical and economic consequences of non-compliance with antimicrobial treatment of canine skin infections. Prev Vet Med. 2011;99(2-4):201210. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.01.006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Reid J, Wiseman-Orr ML, Scott EM, Nolan AM. Development, validation and reliability of a web-based questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life in dogs. J Small Anim Pract. 2013;54(5):227233. doi:10.1111/jsap.12059

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Wright A, Amodie D, Cernicchiaro N, Lascelles B, Pavlock A. Diagnosis and treatment rates of osteoarthritis in dogs using a health risk assessment (HRA) or health questionnaire for osteoarthritis in general veterinary practice. Value Health. 2019;22(2):S387. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2019.04.1886

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Tonsor GT, Schroeder TC. Market impacts of E. coli vaccination in US feedlot cattle. Agric Food Econ. 2015;3(7):115. doi:10.1186/s40100-014-0021-2

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Benedictus A, Hogeveen H, Berends BR. The price of the precautionary principle: cost-effectiveness of BSE intervention strategies in the Netherlands. Prev Vet Med. 2009;89(3-4):212222. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.03.001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Suijkerbuijk AWM, van Gils PF, Bonačić Marinović AA, et al. The design of a social cost-benefit analysis of preventive interventions for toxoplasmosis: an example of the One Health approach. Zoonoses Public Health. 2018;65(1):185194. doi:10.1111/zph.12417

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Mangen MJJ, de Wit GA, Havelaar AH. Economic analysis of Campylobacter control in the Dutch broiler meat chain. Agribusiness. 2007;23(2):173192. doi:10.1002/agr.20123

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Barratt AS, Rich KM, Eze JI, Porphyre T, Gunn GJ, Stott AW. Framework for estimating indirect costs in animal health using time series analysis. Front Vet Sci. 2019;6(120):190. doi:10.3389/fvets.2019.00190

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    McReynolds SW, Sanderson MW, Reeves A, Hill AE. Modeling the impact of vaccination control strategies of a foot and mouth disease outbreak in the Central United States. Prev Vet Med. 2014;117(3–4):487504. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.10.005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Schroeder TC, Pendell DL, Sanderson MW, McReynolds S. Economic impact of alternative FMD emergency vaccination strategies in the Midwestern United States. J Agric Appl Econ. 2015;47(1):4776. doi:10.1017/aae.2014.5

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Codman EA. The product of a hospital. 1914. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1990;114(11):11061111.

  • 35.

    Codman EA. The classic: a study in hospital efficiency: as demonstrated by the case report of first five years of private hospital. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(6):17781783. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2751-3

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):691729. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00397.x

  • 37.

    Cochrane AL. Archie Cochrane in his own words. Selections arranged from his 1972 introduction to “Effectiveness and efficiency: random reflections on the health services”. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10(4):428433. doi:10.1016/0197-2456(89)90008-1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Mission O. The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Accessed September 16, 2021. https://www.ispor.org/about/our-mission.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    Story O. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Accessed September 16, 2021. https://www.pcori.org/about-us/our-story

  • 40.

    Director’s Welcome. Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation (CORE). Yale School of Medicine. Accessed September 16, 2021. https://medicine.yale.edu/core/about/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Accessed May 7, 2021. www.jhsph.edu/research/centers-and-institutes/health-services-outcomes-research/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    Krumholz HM. Outcomes research: generating evidence for best practice and policies. Circulation. 2008;118(3):309318. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.690917

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43.

    Spertus J, Lozada L, Jones P. Sustaining and disseminating the evidence. Abstract in: Proceedings of the Translational Medicine Meeting. BioNexus KC; 2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44.

    Karcher H, Fu S, Efthimiou O, Schneeweiss S, Abenhaim L. A practical guide to adding patient heterogeneity into phase III trials: results from IMI GetReal WP2. Abstract in: Proceedings of the International Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Annual European Congress. Professional International Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research; 2015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45.

    Karcher H, Nordon C, Neumann M, et al. Methods to evaluate real-world effectiveness in pre-authorization trials: a systematic literature review for IMI GetReal WP2. Abstract in: Proceedings of the Health Technology Assessment International Annual Meeting. Health Technology Assessment International; 2015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46.

    Shaw APM, Rushton J, Roth F, Torgerson PR. DALYs, dollars and dogs: how best to analyse the economics of controlling zoonoses. Rev Sci Tech. 2017;36(1):147161. doi:10.20506/rst.36.1.2618

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47.

    Torgerson PR, Rüegg S, Devleesschauwer B, et al. zDALY: an adjusted indicator to estimate the burden of zoonotic diseases. One Health. 2017;5:4045. doi:10.1016/j.onehlt.2017.11.003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48.

    Lavan RP. Development and validation of a survey for quality of life assessment by owners of healthy dogs. Vet J. 2013;197(3):578582. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.03.021

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49.

    Belshaw Z, Asher L, Harvey ND, Dean RS. Quality of life assessment in domestic dogs: an evidence-based rapid review. Vet J. 2015;206(2):203212. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.07.016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50.

    Mwacalimba KK, Contadini FM, Spofford N, et al. Owner and veterinarian perceptions about use of a canine quality of life survey in primary care settings. Front Vet Sci. 2020;7:89. doi:10.3389/fvets.2020.00089

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51.

    Parker RA, Yeates JW. Assessment of quality of life in equine patients. Equine Vet J. 2012;44(2):244249. doi:10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00583.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52.

    Cook JL. Canine orthopedic outcome measures program: where are we now? Vet Surg. 2014;43(3):229231. doi:10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12167.x

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53.

    Giuffrida MA, Brown DC, Ellenberg SS, Farrar JT. Development and psychometric testing of the Canine Owner-Reported Quality of Life questionnaire, an instrument designed to measure quality of life in dogs with cancer. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2018;252(9):10731083. doi:10.2460/javma.252.9.1073

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54.

    Bowen J, Garcia E, Darder P, Arguelles J, Fatjo J. The effects of the Spanish COVID-19 lockdown on people, their pets, and the human-animal bond. J Vet Behav. 2020;40:7591. doi:10.1016/j.jveb.2020.05.013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 55.

    Piotti P, Karagiannis C, Satchell L, et al. Use of the Milan pet quality of life instrument (MPQL) to measure pets’ quality of life during COVID-19. Animals (Basel). 2021;11:1336. doi:10.3390/ani11051336

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 56.

    Wilson SJ, Ward MP, Garner MG. A framework for assessing the intangible impacts of emergency animal disease. Prev Vet Med. 2013;111:194199. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.05.003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 57.

    Pantaleon L. Why measuring outcomes is important in health care. J Vet Intern Med. 2019;33:356362. doi:10.1111/jvim.15458

  • 58.

    Bouwer A. Analysis of survey data for learning effectiveness evaluation of a talent management program for dairies and feedlots. Abstract in: Proceedings of the International Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Annual International Meeting. Professional International Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research; 2015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 59.

    Bouwer A, Holland R, Walter S. Evaluation of audit scoring consistency in a comprehensive feedlot management system and correlation with feedyard performance based on average daily gain and dry feed conversation in 11 US feedlots. Abstract in: Proceedings of the International Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Annual International Meeting. Professional International Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research; 2015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 60.

    Falzon LC, Lechner I, Chantziaras I, et al. Quantitative outcomes of a one health approach to study global health challenges. EcoHealth. 2018;15(1):209227. doi:10.1007/s10393-017-1310-5

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 61.

    Vellinga TV, de Haan MHA, Schils RLM, Evers A, van den Pol–van Dasselaar A. Implementation of GHG mitigation on intensive dairy farms: farmers’ preferences and variation in cost effectiveness. Livest Sci. 2011;137:185195. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2010.11.005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 62.

    Wright A, Russo S, DiFranco B, Gasper S, Amodie D. Client acceptance trial with injectable cefovecin sodium in dogs as a first line of treatment for superficial pyoderma, wounds, and abscesses caused by susceptible strains of Staphylococcus intermedius and Streptococcus canis group G. Abstract in: Proceedings of the International Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Annual International Meeting. Professional International Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research; 2015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 63.

    Widmar NO, Bir C, Slipchenko N, Wolf C, Hansen C, Ouedraogo F. Online procurement of pet supplies and willingness to pay for veterinary telemedicine. Prev Vet Med. 2020;181:105073. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105073

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 64.

    Depoorter P, Van Huffel X, Diricks H, et al. Measuring general animal health status: development of an animal health barometer. Prev Vet Med. 2015;118(4):341350. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.12.008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 65.

    Poulsen Nautrup B, van Vlaenderen IV, Wright A, Holland R, Gasper S. Health and economic benefits of vaccinating horses against West Nile Virus in the USA. Abstract in: Proceedings of the 13th World Equine Veterinary Association Congress. World Equine Veterinary Association; 2013.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 66.

    Abell KM, Theurer ME, Larson RL, White BJ, Apley M. A mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis of metaphylaxis treatments for bovine respiratory disease in beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2017;95(2):626635. doi:10.2527/jas.2016.1062

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 67.

    Cull CA, Paddock ZD, Nagaraja TG, Bello NM, Babcock AH, Renter DG. Efficacy of a vaccine and a direct-fed microbial against fecal shedding of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in a randomized pen-level field trial of commercial feedlot cattle. Vaccine. 2012;30(43):62106215. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.05.080

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 68.

    Cull CA, Renter DG, Bello NM, Ives SE, Babcock AH. Performance and carcass characteristics of commercial feedlot cattle from a study of vaccine and direct-fed microbial effects on Escherichia coli O157:H7 fecal shedding. J Anim Sci. 2015;93(6):31443151. doi:10.2527/jas.2015-8924

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 69.

    Dennis EJ, Schroeder TC, Renter DG, Pendell DL. Value of arrival metaphylaxis in US cattle industry. 2018. J Agric Resour Econ. 2018;43(2):233250. doi:10.22004/ag.econ.273448

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 70.

    O’Connor AM, Yuan C, Cullen JN, Coetzee JF, da Silva N, Wang C. A mixed treatment meta-analysis of antibiotic treatment options for bovine respiratory disease—an update. Prev Vet Med. 2016;132:130139. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.07.003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 71.

    Poulsen Nautrup B, Van Vlaenderen I, Decker M, Cleale RM. Antimicrobial drug use for control and treatment of bovine respiratory disease in US feedlot cattle: a meta-analysis of comparative studies versus tulathromycin. Bovine Pract. 2017;51(1):113. doi:10.21423/bovine-vol51no1p1-13

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 72.

    Roth F, Zinsstag J, Orkhon D, et al. Human health benefits from livestock vaccination for brucellosis: case study. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(12):867876.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 73.

    Babo Martins S, Rushton J. Cost-effectiveness analysis: adding value to assessment of animal health, welfare and production. Rev Sci Tech. 2014;33(3):681689. doi:10.20506/rst.33.3.2312

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 74.

    Bergevoet RH, van Schaik G, Veling J, Backus GBC, Franken P. Economic and epidemiological evaluation of Salmonella control in Dutch dairy herds. Prev Vet Med. 2009;89(1-2):17. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.12.007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 75.

    Lawson LG, Jensen JD, Christiansen P, Lund M. Cost-effectiveness of Salmonella reduction in Danish abattoirs. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009;134(1-2):126132. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.03.024

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 76.

    Simons R, Hill A, de Souza Monteiro D, Fraser R, Cook A. A cost-effectiveness analysis for Salmonella interventions in the British pig meat production chain. Abstract in: Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Epidemiology and Control of Biological, Chemical and Physical Hazards in the Pork Chain. MCI Deutschland GmbH; 2009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 77.

    Pillars RB, Grooms DL, Wolf CA, Kaneene JB. Economic evaluation of Johne’s disease control programs implemented on six Michigan dairy farms. Prev Vet Med. 2009;90(3-4):223232. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.04.009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 78.

    Martínez-López B, Carpenter TE, Sánchez-Vizcaíno JM. Risk assessment and cost-effectiveness analysis of Aujeszky’s disease virus introduction through breeding and fattening pig movements into Spain. Prev Vet Med. 2009;90(1-2):1016. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.03.004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 79.

    De Vos CJ, Saatkamp HW, Huirne RB. Cost-effectiveness of measures to prevent classical swine fever introduction into the Netherlands. Prev Vet Med. 2005;70(3-4):235256. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.04.001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 80.

    Knight-Jones TJ, Hauser R, Matthes D, Stärk KDC. Evaluation of effectiveness and efficiency of wild bird surveillance for avian influenza. Vet Res. 2010;41(4):50. doi:10.1051/vetres/2010023

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 81.

    Hadorn D, Racloz V, Schwermer H, Stärk KDC. Establishing a cost-effective national surveillance system for Bluetongue using scenario tree modelling. Vet Res. 2009;40(6):114. doi:10.1051/vetres/2009040

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 82.

    Regula G, Lo Fo Wong DM, Ledergerber U, et al. Evaluation of an antimicrobial resistance monitoring program for Campylobacter in poultry by simulation. Prev Vet Med. 2005;70(1-2):2943. doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 83.

    Telemedicine. AVMA. Accessed August 6, 2021. https://www.avma.org/resources-tools/avma-policies/telemedicine

  • 84.

    Cleaveland S, Kaare M, Knobel D, Laurenson MK. Canine vaccination—providing broader benefits for disease control. Vet Microbiol. 2006;5(117-1):4350. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.04.009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 85.

    Kaare M, Lembo T, Hampson K, et al. Rabies control in rural Africa: evaluating strategies for effective domestic dog vaccination. Vaccine. 2009;27(1):152160. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.09.054

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 86.

    Beyene TJ, Fitzpatrick M, Galvani AP, et al. Impact of One-Health framework on vaccination cost-effectiveness: a case study of rabies in Ethiopia. One Health. 2019;8:100103. doi:10.1016/j.onehlt.2019.100103

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 87.

    Okello WO, Okello AL, Inthavong P, et al. Improved methods to capture the total societal benefits of zoonotic disease control: demonstrating the cost-effectiveness of an integrated control programme for Taenia solium, soil transmitted helminths and classical swine fever in northern Lao PDR. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(9):e0006782. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0006782

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 88.

    Taylor D. The pharmaceutical industry and the future of drug development. In: Hester RE, Harrison RM, eds. Pharmaceuticals in the Environment. Royal Society of Chemistry; 2015:133. doi:10.1039/9781782622345–00001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 89.

    Sullivan SD, Manuskopf JA, Augustovski F, et al. Budget impact analysis—principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force. Value Health. 2014;17(1):514. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2013.08.2291

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 90.

    Sørensen J, Andersen LS. The case of tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis—a budget impact analysis. Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(3):289298. doi:10.2165/00019053-200523030-00008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 91.

    Nuijten MJC, Rutten F. Combining a budgetary-impact analysis and a cost-effectiveness analysis using decision-analytic modelling techniques. Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(12):855867. doi:10.2165/00019053-200220120-00006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 92.

    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Accessed May 7, 2021. https://www.nice.org.uk/about/what-we-do/our-programmes/nice-guidance/chte-methods-consultation

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 93.

    Basu A. Economics of individualization in comparative effectiveness research and a basis for a patient-centered health care. J Health Econ. 2011;30(3):549559. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.03.004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 94.

    Karcher H, Bradbury C, Mozaffari E, et al. Drivers of effectiveness for informed outcomes-based agreements. Abstract in: Proceedings of the International Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Annual International Meeting. Professional International Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research; 2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 95.

    Top10 HEOR trends. International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. Accessed May 7, 2020. https://www.ispor.org/docs/default-source/heor-resources/2020-top-10-heor-trendsv-online_00120191219.pdf?sfvrsn=9eebcb74_0

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 96.

    Industry data. North American Pet Health Insurance Association (NAPHIA). Accessed May 7, 2021. https://naphia.org/industry-data/

  • 97.

    Ross K. Pet insurance for all: Sweden’s experience. Accessed August 6, 2021. https://news.vin.com/default.aspx?pid=210&Id=9305364

  • 98.

    Mills G. New highs for pet insurance market. Vet Rec. 2019;184(17):515. doi:10.1136/vr.l1896

  • 99.

    Jarvis S. Is pet insurance sustainable? Vet Rec. 2019;184(7):210. doi:10.1136/vr.l721

  • 100.

    Center for Outcomes Research and Epidemiology. College of Veterinary Medicine. Kansas State University. Accessed May 7, 2021. https://www.vet.k-state.edu/research/core/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 101.

    Animal health – new kid on the HEOR block? The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Accessed May 3, 2021. https://www.ispor.org/heor-resources/presentations-database/presentation/euro2019-3150/10816

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement

Outcomes research: origins, relevance, and potential impacts for veterinary medicine

View More View Less
  • 1 Center for Outcomes Research and Epidemiology (CORE), College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS

Contributor Notes

Corresponding author: Dr. Renter (drenter@vet.k-state.edu)