Medical futility is commonly encountered in small animal clinical practice

Nathan W. PetersonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Search for other papers by Nathan W. Peterson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, DACVECC
,
J. Wesley BoydCenter for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Psychiatry and Medical Ethics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX

Search for other papers by J. Wesley Boyd in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
, and
Lisa MosesCenter for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Faculty of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
Interdisciplinary Center for Bioethics, Yale University, New Haven, CT

Search for other papers by Lisa Moses in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 VMD, DACVIM (SAIM)
View More View Less

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To document veterinarians’ perceptions and understanding of medical futility and determine the frequency with which medical futility occurs in small animal practice.

SAMPLE

477 veterinarians in small animal general and specialty veterinary practice.

PROCEDURES

A cross-sectional study was performed with a 25-question, web-based, confidential, anonymous survey distributed through various professional veterinary specialty associations.

RESULTS

Nearly all respondents (469/474 [99.0%]) believed that futile care occurs in veterinary medicine, and 42.4% (201/474) felt it occurred commonly (> 6 times/y). A similar percentage (471/475 [99.2%]) reported encountering futile care within their careers, and 85.0% (402/476) reported encountering it within the past year. A majority (293/477 [61.4%]) reported witnessing futile care occurring in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Most respondents disagreed or strongly disagreed (320/463 [69.1%]) with a statement that providing futile care is always wrong, and only 38 (8.2%) agreed or strongly agreed. Over 70% (329/464 [70.9%]) of respondents agreed that there are situations in which provision of futile care is appropriate.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The importance of reaching a consensus definition for medical futility in veterinary medicine is evident given the frequency with which such care is being provided. Most small animal specialist veterinarians will encounter futile care, and the establishment of an ethical framework to navigate questions surrounding medical futility may help reduce moral distress.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To document veterinarians’ perceptions and understanding of medical futility and determine the frequency with which medical futility occurs in small animal practice.

SAMPLE

477 veterinarians in small animal general and specialty veterinary practice.

PROCEDURES

A cross-sectional study was performed with a 25-question, web-based, confidential, anonymous survey distributed through various professional veterinary specialty associations.

RESULTS

Nearly all respondents (469/474 [99.0%]) believed that futile care occurs in veterinary medicine, and 42.4% (201/474) felt it occurred commonly (> 6 times/y). A similar percentage (471/475 [99.2%]) reported encountering futile care within their careers, and 85.0% (402/476) reported encountering it within the past year. A majority (293/477 [61.4%]) reported witnessing futile care occurring in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Most respondents disagreed or strongly disagreed (320/463 [69.1%]) with a statement that providing futile care is always wrong, and only 38 (8.2%) agreed or strongly agreed. Over 70% (329/464 [70.9%]) of respondents agreed that there are situations in which provision of futile care is appropriate.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The importance of reaching a consensus definition for medical futility in veterinary medicine is evident given the frequency with which such care is being provided. Most small animal specialist veterinarians will encounter futile care, and the establishment of an ethical framework to navigate questions surrounding medical futility may help reduce moral distress.

Contributor Notes

Corresponding author: Dr. Peterson (nwp26@cornell.edu)
  • 1.

    Moses L, Malowney MJ, Boyd JW. Ethical conflict and moral distress in veterinary practice: a survey of North American veterinarians. J Vet Intern Med. 2018;32(6):21152122.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Jones WHS. Hippocrates. Vol II. Harvard University Press; 1959.

  • 3.

    Schneiderman LJ, Jecker NS, Jonsen AR. Medical futility: its meaning and ethical implications. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112(12):949954.

  • 4.

    Schneiderman LJ. Defining medical futility and improving medical care. J Bioeth Inq. 2011;8(2):123131.

  • 5.

    Solomon MZ, O’Donnell LO, Jennings B, et al. Decisions near the end of life: professional views on life-sustaining treatments. Am J Public Health. 1993;83(1):1423.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Meltzer LS, Huckabay LM. Critical care nurses’ perceptions of futile care and its effect on burnout. Am J Crit Care. 2004;13(3):202208.

  • 7.

    Clark PA. Medical futility: legal and ethical analysis. Virtual Mentor. 2007;9(5):375383.

  • 8.

    Huynh TN, Kleerup EC, Raj PP, Wenger NS. The opportunity cost of futile treatment in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(9):19771982.

  • 9.

    Jox RJ, Schaider A, Marckmann G, Borasio GD. Medical futility at the end of life: the perspectives of intensive care and palliative care clinicians. J Med Ethics. 2012;38(9):540545.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Coonan E. Medical futility: a contemporary review. J Clin Ethics. 2016;27(4):359362.

  • 11.

    Truog RD. Tackling medical futility in Texas. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(1):13. doi:10.1056/MEJMp078109

  • 12.

    Mohindra RK. Medical futility: a conceptual model. J Med Ethics. 2007;33(2):7175.

  • 13.

    Batchelor CEM, McKeegan DEF. Survey of the frequency and perceived stressfulness of ethical dilemmas encountered in UK veterinary practice. Vet Rec. 2012;170(1):19. doi:10.1136/vr.100262

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Herzog HA, Vore TL, New JC Jr. Conversations with veterinary students: attitudes, ethics, and animals. Anthrozoos. 1989;2(3):181188.

  • 15.

    Fordyce PS. Welfare, law and ethics in the veterinary intensive care unit. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2017;44(2):203211.

  • 16.

    Clutton RE. Recognising the boundary between heroism and futility in veterinary intensive care. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2017;44(2):199202.

  • 17.

    Dean W, Talbot SG, Caplan A. Clarifying the language of clinician distress. JA MA. 2020;323(10):923924.

  • 18.

    Montoya AI, Hazel S, Matthew SM, McArthur ML. Moral distress of veterinarians. Vet Rec. 2019;185(20):631. doi:10.1136/vr.105289

  • 19.

    Hernandez E, Fawcett A, Brouwer E, Rau J, Turner PV. Speaking up: veterinary ethical responsibilities and animal welfare issues in everyday practice. Animals (Basel). 2018;8(1):15. doi:10.3390/ani8010015

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Nett RJ, Witte TK, Holzbauer SM, et al. Risk factors for suicide, attitudes toward mental illness, and practice-related stressors among US veterinarians. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2015;247(8):945955.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Huynh TN, Kleerup EC, Wiley JF. The frequency and cost of treatment perceived to be futile in critical care. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(20):18871894.

  • 22.

    Danis M, Truog R, Devita M, et al. Consensus statement of the Society of Critical Care Medicine’s Ethics Committee regarding futile and other possibly inadvisable treatments. Crit Care Med. 1997;25(5):887891.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    American Thoracic Society. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115(6):478485.

  • 24.

    Bosslet GT, Pope TM, Rubenfeld GD, et al. An official ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM policy statement: responding to requests for potentially inappropriate treatments in intensive care units. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191(11):13181330.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Cornell KK, Kopcha M. Client-veterinarian communication: skills for client centered dialogue and shared decision making. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2007;37(1):3747.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Christiansen SB, Kristensen AT, Lassen J, Sandøe P. Veterinarians’ role in clients’ decision-making regarding seriously ill companion animal patients. Acta Vet Scand. 2016;58(1):30. doi:10.1186/s13028-016-0211-x

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49(5):651661.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Hardingham LB. Integrity and moral residue: nurses as participants in a moral community. Nurs Philos. 2004;5(2):127134.

  • 29.

    Mealer M, Moss M. Moral distress in ICU nurses. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(10):16151617.

  • 30.

    Colville GA, Dawson D, Rabinthiran S, Chaudry-Daley Z, Perkins-Porras L. A survey of moral distress in staff working in intensive care in the UK. J Intensive Care Soc. 2019;20(3):196203.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Jackson VA, Jacobsen J, Greer JA, Pril WF, Temel JS, Back AL. The cultivation of prognostic awareness through the provision of early palliative care in the ambulatory setting: a communication guide. J Palliat Med. 2013;16(8):894900.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Yaxley PE. Michigan State University veterinary hospice care: an academic hospice practice 2011 to 2014. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2019;49(3):351362.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement