HuntGB, TisdallPL, LiptakJM, BeckJA, SwinneyGR, MalikR. Skin-fold advancement flaps for closing large proximal limb and trunk defects in dogs and cats. Vet Surg.2001;30(5):440–448. doi:10.1053/jvet.2001.25868
HuntGB, TisdallPL, LiptakJM, BeckJA, SwinneyGR, MalikR. Skin-fold advancement flaps for closing large proximal limb and trunk defects in dogs and cats. Vet Surg. 2001;30(5):440–448. doi:10.1053/jvet.2001.2586810.1053/jvet.2001.25868)| false
GrigoropoulouVA, PrassinosNN, PapazoglouLG, GalatosAD, PourlisAF. Scrotal flap for closure of perineal skin defects in dogs. Vet Surg. 2013;42(2):186–191. doi:10.1111/j.1532-950X.2012.00998.x10.1111/j.1532-950X.2012.00998.x)| false
HuntGB, WinsonO, FullerMC, KimJY. Pilot study of the suitability of dorsal vulval skin as a transposition flap: vascular anatomic study and clinical application. Vet Surg.2013;42(5):523–528. doi:10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12013.x
HuntGB, WinsonO, FullerMC, KimJY. Pilot study of the suitability of dorsal vulval skin as a transposition flap: vascular anatomic study and clinical application. Vet Surg. 2013;42(5):523–528. doi:10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12013.x10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12013.x)| false
PopovitchCA, HoltD, BrightR. Colopexy as a treatment for rectal prolapse in dogs and cats: a retrospective study of 14 cases. Vet Surg. 1994;23(2):115–118. doi:10.1111/j.1532-950x.1994.tb00455.x10.1111/j.1532-950X.1994.tb00455.x)| false
ChenAV, BagleyRS, WestCL, GavinPR, TuckerRL. Fecal incontinence and spinal cord abnormalities in seven dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2005;227(12):1945–1951. doi:10.2460/javma.2005.227.194510.2460/javma.2005.227.1945)| false
AndersonGI, McKeownDB, PartlowGD, PercyDH. Rectal resection in the dog: a new surgical approach and the evaluation of its effect on fecal continence. Vet Surg.1987;16(2):119–125. doi:10.1111/j.1532-950x.1987.tb00922.x
AndersonGI, McKeownDB, PartlowGD, PercyDH. Rectal resection in the dog: a new surgical approach and the evaluation of its effect on fecal continence. Vet Surg. 1987;16(2):119–125. doi:10.1111/j.1532-950x.1987.tb00922.x10.1111/j.1532-950X.1987.tb00922.x)| false
MorelloE, MartanoM, SquassinoC, Transanal pull-through rectal amputation for treatment of colorectal carcinoma in 11 dogs. Vet Surg. 2008;37(5):420–426. doi:10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00404.x10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00404.x)| false
A 4-month-old 4.2 kg sexually intact female mixed-breed dog was evaluated for rectal and vesicular tenesmus, intermittent rectal prolapse, fecal incontinence, and an anogenital cleft.
Rectal prolapse and an anogenital cleft were confirmed on physical examination. Results of a CBC and serum biochemical analysis were within respective reference ranges, and abdominal ultrasonography revealed no abnormalities. Urinalysis revealed evidence of a urinary tract infection.
TREATMENT AND OUTCOME
An H-perineoplasty was performed and the prolapse was reduced. The repair partially dehisced and was repaired (with concurrent reduction of a recurrent rectal prolapse) but dehisced again. There was limited tissue available for additional reconstruction. In another surgical procedure, the rectum was allowed to prolapse, the most dorsal 40% of the prolapsed rectal tissue was resected, and the rectal tissue margin and skin in this region were apposed. The remaining rectal tissue flap was folded ventrally, and the lateral margins of the aborad aspect were sutured to the dorsolateral vestibular mucosa. In a subsequent surgery, 2.5 to 3 cm of the rectal tissue flap was excised. The remainder was used to create ventral margins for the rectum and vestibular mucosa. The perineal skin between the anus and dorsal vulvar commissure was closed. The patient experienced mild cutaneous partial dehiscence of the repair that healed by second intention. Over an 18-month follow-up period, some fecal incontinence persisted, but straining resolved and urinary tract infection did not recur.
For the dog of this report, the use of rectal mucosa in surgical repair of an anogenital cleft provided an acceptable clinical outcome.