Knight-JonesTJD, RushtonJ. The economic impacts of foot and mouth disease—what are they, how big are they and where do they occur? Prev Vet Med. 2013;112(3–4):161–173.10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.07.013)| false
USDA National Agricultures Statistics Service. Overview of US livestock, poultry, and aquaculture production in 2017. Accessed May 1, 2020. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/nahms/downloads/Demographics2017.pdf)| false
BuhnerkempeMG, GrearDA, PortacciK, MillerRS, LombardJE, WebbCT. A national-scale picture of US cattle movements obtained from Interstate Certificate of Veterinary Inspection data. Prev Vet Med.2013;112(3–4):318–329.
BuhnerkempeMG, GrearDA, PortacciK, MillerRS, LombardJE, WebbCT. A national-scale picture of US cattle movements obtained from Interstate Certificate of Veterinary Inspection data. Prev Vet Med. 2013;112(3–4):318–329.10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.08.002)| false
BuhnerkempeMG, TildesleyMJ, LindstromT, The impact of movements and animal density on continental scale cattle disease outbreaks in the United States. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e91724.10.1371/journal.pone.0091724)| false
KinsleyAC, PerezAM, CraftME, VanderwaalKL. Characterization of swine movements in the United States and implications for disease control. Prev Vet Med. 2019;164:1–9.10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.01.001)| false
McReynoldsSW, SandersonMW, ReevesA, SinclairM, HillAE, SalmanMD. Direct and indirect contact rates among livestock operations in Colorado and Kansas. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2014;244(9):1066–1074.10.2460/javma.244.9.1066)| false
ThurmondMC, GibbsEP, BrownCC, WagnerGG, WilsonTM, LautnerBA. Educational preparedness of veterinarians for foreign animal diseases. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003;222(10):1352–1357.10.2460/javma.2003.222.1352)| false
DelgadoAH, NorbyB, ScottHM, DeanW, McIntoshWA, BushE. Distribution of cow-calf producers’ beliefs regarding gathering and holding their cattle and observing animal movement restrictions during an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease. Prev Vet Med.2014;117(3-4):518–532.
DelgadoAH, NorbyB, ScottHM, DeanW, McIntoshWA, BushE. Distribution of cow-calf producers’ beliefs regarding gathering and holding their cattle and observing animal movement restrictions during an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease. Prev Vet Med. 2014;117(3-4):518–532.10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.09.010)| false
AdkinA, BrouwerA, SimonsRRL, Development of risk-based trading farm scoring system to assist with the control of bovine tuberculosis in cattle in England and Wales. Prev Vet Med. 2016;123:32–38.10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.11.020)| false
To collect information from US state animal health officials (SAHOs) and beef feedlot managers and veterinarians regarding emergency response plans for movement of cattle in the event of a foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) outbreak in North America.
36 SAHOs, 26 feedlot veterinarians, and 7 feedlot managers.
3 versions of an electronic questionnaire were created and distributed to SAHOs and US feedlot veterinarians and managers to gather information about planned or expected responses to an FMD outbreak that originated at 1 of 3 geographic locations (Mexico or Canada, a bordering state, or a nonbordering state). Descriptive data were reported.
All respondents recognized that the risk of FMD transmission to livestock in their area or care increased as the outbreak got closer in proximity to their location. Most SAHOs indicated that they would immediately close their state’s borders to livestock movement at the beginning of an FMD outbreak, particularly if the disease was identified in a bordering state. During an extended FMD outbreak, 29 of 36 (80.6%) SAHOs reported they would resume interstate movement of cattle under some conditions, including enhanced permitting, whereas feedlot veterinarians and managers commonly reported they would be willing to receive cattle from states where no FMD-infected animals were identified, regardless of permit requirements.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Information gained from this survey can be used to inform disease modeling and preparedness efforts to facilitate business continuity of US beef feedlots in the event of an FMD outbreak in North America.