Type, prevalence, and risk factors for the development of orthopedic injuries in endurance horses during training and competition

Angelo Paris From 06028 Sigillo, Italy.

Search for other papers by Angelo Paris in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Francesca Beccati Veterinary Teaching Hospital and Sport Horse Research Center, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, 06126 Perugia, Italy.

Search for other papers by Francesca Beccati in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
Marco Pepe Veterinary Teaching Hospital and Sport Horse Research Center, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, 06126 Perugia, Italy.

Search for other papers by Marco Pepe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To report the type, prevalence, and risk factors for the development of orthopedic injuries in endurance horses.

ANIMALS

235 endurance horses.

PROCEDURES

Medical records of horses examined between January 2007 and December 2018 were reviewed. Recorded data were birth; breed; sex; dates of first and last examinations; presence of any conformation fault, lameness, positive flexion test result, and orthopedic injury; starts in endurance competitions; level of athletic activity; professional status of trainer or rider; and whether an orthopedic injury developed in > 1 limb or during or within 2 days after competition, lameness resolved after treatment, reinjury occurred, horse was eliminated from competition after treatment, and the horse required retirement from endurance competitions. Anatomic locations of injuries were classified as proximal portion of the metacarpal area, midportion of the metacarpal area, metacarpo- or metatarsophalangeal (fetlock) area, tarsus, or foot. For each outcome, multivariable logistic regression models were developed after bivariable logistic regression and collinearity analyses.

RESULTS

351 orthopedic injuries were detected in 76.6% of the horses, with 27.1% that affected the fetlock area, 21.4% the proximal portion of the metacarpal area, 21.1% the foot, 12.8% the tarsus, 9.1% the midportion of the metacarpal area, and 8.5% other sites. High suspensory disease (21.4%) was the most common condition, followed by arthropathy of the metacarpo- or metatarsophalangeal joint (19.4%) and solar pain (14%). Age at first examination (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.37 to 2.11), months of observation (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.05), conformation fault of forelimbs (OR, 4.08; 95% CI, 1.53 to 10.89), and amateur status (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.86 to 7.99) remained significant in the final multivariable regression model for the development of orthopedic injuries.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A large number of endurance horses developed ≥ 1 orthopedic injury during training or competition. Clinical and diagnostic examinations should be focused with particular attention to the metacarpophalangeal joints, proximal portion of the metacarpal area, and foot.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To report the type, prevalence, and risk factors for the development of orthopedic injuries in endurance horses.

ANIMALS

235 endurance horses.

PROCEDURES

Medical records of horses examined between January 2007 and December 2018 were reviewed. Recorded data were birth; breed; sex; dates of first and last examinations; presence of any conformation fault, lameness, positive flexion test result, and orthopedic injury; starts in endurance competitions; level of athletic activity; professional status of trainer or rider; and whether an orthopedic injury developed in > 1 limb or during or within 2 days after competition, lameness resolved after treatment, reinjury occurred, horse was eliminated from competition after treatment, and the horse required retirement from endurance competitions. Anatomic locations of injuries were classified as proximal portion of the metacarpal area, midportion of the metacarpal area, metacarpo- or metatarsophalangeal (fetlock) area, tarsus, or foot. For each outcome, multivariable logistic regression models were developed after bivariable logistic regression and collinearity analyses.

RESULTS

351 orthopedic injuries were detected in 76.6% of the horses, with 27.1% that affected the fetlock area, 21.4% the proximal portion of the metacarpal area, 21.1% the foot, 12.8% the tarsus, 9.1% the midportion of the metacarpal area, and 8.5% other sites. High suspensory disease (21.4%) was the most common condition, followed by arthropathy of the metacarpo- or metatarsophalangeal joint (19.4%) and solar pain (14%). Age at first examination (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.37 to 2.11), months of observation (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.05), conformation fault of forelimbs (OR, 4.08; 95% CI, 1.53 to 10.89), and amateur status (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.86 to 7.99) remained significant in the final multivariable regression model for the development of orthopedic injuries.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A large number of endurance horses developed ≥ 1 orthopedic injury during training or competition. Clinical and diagnostic examinations should be focused with particular attention to the metacarpophalangeal joints, proximal portion of the metacarpal area, and foot.

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Beccati (francesca.beccati@unipg.it).
  • 1.

    Fédération Équestre Internationale. FEI annual report. Lausanne, Switzerland: Fédération Équestre Internationale, 2017.

  • 2.

    Nagy A, Murray JK, Dyson S. Elimination from elite endurance rides in nine countries: a preliminary study. Equine Vet J Suppl 2010;38:637643.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Nagy A, Murray JK, Dyson S. Descriptive epidemiology and risk factors for eliminations from Fédération Equestre Internationale endurance rides due to lameness and metabolic reasons (2008–2011). Equine Vet J 2014;46:3844.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Di Battista C, Conte M, Pepe M, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors for eliminations from Fédération Equestre Internationale endurance rides between 2004–2015 in Italy. Prev Vet Med 2019;170:104737.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Robert C. Veterinary aspect of training and racing endurance horses. In: Hinchcliff KW, Kaneps A, Geor R, eds. Equine sport medicine and surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier, 2013;10831106.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Nagy A, Dyson SJ, Murray JK. Veterinary problems in endurance horses in England and Wales. Prev Vet Med 2017;140:4552.

  • 7.

    Misheff MM, Alexander GR, Hirst GR. Management of fractures in endurance horses. Equine Vet Educ 2010;22:623630.

  • 8.

    Puccetti M, Pepe M, Gialletti R, et al. Incidenza delle patologie osteoarticolari in un gruppo di 13 cavalli da endurance durante un periodo di 18 mesi, in iProceedings. 11th Annu Intern Cong Italian Soc of Equine Pract (SIVE) 2005;205.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Misheff MM. Lameness in endurance horses. In: Ross MW, Dyson SJ, eds. Diagnosis and management of lameness in the horse. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2011;11371149.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Nagy A. Characteristics of orthopedic problems in endurance horses. Available at: semanticscholar.org/paper/Characteristics-of-orthopedic-problems-in-horses.-Nagy/e7d78362d5a5ce690bddbf94fe062920496a083d. Accessed Mar 16, 2020.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Bassage LH, Ross MW. Diagnostic analgesia. In: Ross MW, Dyson SJ eds. Diagnosis and management of lameness in the horse. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2011;100135.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. STROBE Statement: linee guida per descrivere gli studi osservazionali. Ter Evid Based 2008;1:18.

  • 13.

    Ross MW, McIlwraith CW. Conformation and lameness. In: Ross MW, Dyson SJ, eds. Diagnosis and management of lameness in the horse. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2011;1532.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Ross MW. Movement. In: Ross MW, Dyson SJ, eds. Diagnosis and management of lameness in the horse. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2011;6480.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Nagy A, Dyson SJ, Murray JK. A veterinary review of endurance riding as an international competitive sport. Vet J 2012;194:288293.

  • 16.

    Fédération Équestre Internationale. FEI endurance rules 2020. Lausanne, Switzerland: Fédération Équestre Internationale, 2020.

  • 17.

    Ross MW. Manipulation. In: Ross MW, Dyson SJ, eds. Diagnosis and management of lameness in the horse. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2011;8088.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Bolwell CF, Rogers CW, Rosanowski SM, et al. Cross-sectional survey of the management and training practices of endurance horses in New Zealand: a pilot study. J Equine Vet Sci 2015;35:801806.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Bassage LH. Metacarpus/metatarsus. In: Hinchcliff KW, Kaneps A, Geor R, eds. Equine sport medicine and surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier, 2013;297325.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Beccati F, Cerocchi A, Conte M, et al. Computed tomographic diagnosis of incomplete palmar cortical (fatigue) fracture of the third metacarpal bone in two young adult endurance horses. Equine Vet Educ 2019;31:e17e22.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Wasserstein D, Spinder KP. Pathophysiology and epidemiology of stress fracture. In: Miller TL, Kaeding CC, eds. Stress fractures in athletes. London: Springer, 2015;312.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    de Mira MC, Santos C, Lopes MA, et al. Challenges encountered by Federation Equestre Internationale (FEI) veterinarians in gait evaluation during FEI endurance competitions: an international survey. Comp Exerc Physiol 2019;15:371378.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Dyson SJ. The metacarpal region. In: Ross MW, Dyson SJ, eds. Diagnosis and management of lameness in the horse. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2011;411426.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Bertone AL. Distal limb: fetlock and pastern. In: Hinchcliff KW, Kaneps A, Geor R, eds. Equine sport medicine and surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier, 2013;275296.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Goble DO. Medical evaluation of the musculoskeletal system and common integument relevant to purchase. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1992;8:285302.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Dyson S. Is there an association between conformation and lameness? UK Vet Equine 2018;2:5761.

  • 27.

    Ducro BJ, Bovenhuis H, Back W. Heritability of foot conformation and its relationship with sports performance in a Dutch Warmblood horse population. Equine Vet J 2009;41:139143.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Jönsson L, Egenvall A, Roepstor L, et al. Associations of health status and conformation with longevity and lifetime competition performance in young Swedish Warmblood riding horses: 8,238 cases (1983–2005). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2014;244:14491461.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Ross MW, Dyson SJ. The tarsus. In: Ross MW, Dyson SJ, eds. Diagnosis and management of lameness in the horse. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2011;508526.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Keegan KG, Dent EV, Janicek J, et al. Repeatability of subjective evaluation of lameness in horses. Equine Vet J 2010;42:9297.

Advertisement