Effects of three diet history questions on the amount of information gained from a sample of pet owners in Ontario, Canada

Jason B. Coe 1Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

Search for other papers by Jason B. Coe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Rachel E. O'Connor 1Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

Search for other papers by Rachel E. O'Connor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MSc
,
Clare MacMartin 3Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, College of Social & Applied Human Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

Search for other papers by Clare MacMartin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Adronie Verbrugghe 2Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

Search for other papers by Adronie Verbrugghe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
Kristen A. Janke 1Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

Search for other papers by Kristen A. Janke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, BSc, BED

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of 3 diet history questions on the amount and type of diet-related information gathered from pet owners and to assess whether diet-related information obtained with each question in person differed from information obtained with a diet history survey.

SAMPLE

99 pet owners.

PROCEDURES

Participants' responses to 1 of 3 randomly selected diet history questions (“Tell me everything he [or she] eats throughout a day, starting first thing in the morning right through to the end of the day”; “What kind of food does she [or he] eat?”; or “What kind of foods does he [or she] eat?”) were recorded and coded for analysis. Participants completed a postinteraction diet history survey. Amount and type of diet-related information obtained were compared among responses to the 3 diet history questions and between the response to each question and the diet history survey.

RESULTS

The “Tell me…” question elicited a significantly higher total number of diet-related items (combined number of main diet, treat, human food, medication, and dietary supplement items) than did the “What kind of food…” or “What kind of foods…” questions. The diet history survey captured significantly more information than did the “What kind of food…” or “What kind of foods…” questions; there was little difference between results of the diet history survey and the “Tell me…” question, except that treats were more frequently disclosed on the survey.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Findings reinforced the value of using broad, open questions or requests that invite expansion from clients for gathering diet-related information.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of 3 diet history questions on the amount and type of diet-related information gathered from pet owners and to assess whether diet-related information obtained with each question in person differed from information obtained with a diet history survey.

SAMPLE

99 pet owners.

PROCEDURES

Participants' responses to 1 of 3 randomly selected diet history questions (“Tell me everything he [or she] eats throughout a day, starting first thing in the morning right through to the end of the day”; “What kind of food does she [or he] eat?”; or “What kind of foods does he [or she] eat?”) were recorded and coded for analysis. Participants completed a postinteraction diet history survey. Amount and type of diet-related information obtained were compared among responses to the 3 diet history questions and between the response to each question and the diet history survey.

RESULTS

The “Tell me…” question elicited a significantly higher total number of diet-related items (combined number of main diet, treat, human food, medication, and dietary supplement items) than did the “What kind of food…” or “What kind of foods…” questions. The diet history survey captured significantly more information than did the “What kind of food…” or “What kind of foods…” questions; there was little difference between results of the diet history survey and the “Tell me…” question, except that treats were more frequently disclosed on the survey.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Findings reinforced the value of using broad, open questions or requests that invite expansion from clients for gathering diet-related information.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 349 0 0
Full Text Views 1883 1361 81
PDF Downloads 596 260 12
Advertisement