Temporal trends in intake and outcome data for animal shelter and rescue facilities in Colorado from 2000 through 2015

Sloane M. Hawes Institute for Human-Animal Connection, Graduate School of Social Work, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208.

Search for other papers by Sloane M. Hawes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
 MSW
,
Bridget A. Camacho Institute for Human-Animal Connection, Graduate School of Social Work, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208.

Search for other papers by Bridget A. Camacho in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
 MSW
,
Philip Tedeschi Institute for Human-Animal Connection, Graduate School of Social Work, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208.

Search for other papers by Philip Tedeschi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
 MSSW
, and
Kevin N. Morris Institute for Human-Animal Connection, Graduate School of Social Work, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208.

Search for other papers by Kevin N. Morris in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
 PhD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.254.3.363
Volume/Issue:
Volume 254: Issue 3
Online Publication Date:
01 Feb 2019
Restricted access
Sign In Reprints and Permissions Purchase Article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To measure temporal trends in animal shelter and rescue intakes and outcomes for dogs and cats in Colorado from 2000 through 2015 and compare trends from 2008 through 2015 with previously reported trends from 2000 through 2007.

DESIGN Serial cross-sectional study.

SAMPLE 76 animal shelter and rescue facilities with annual intake and outcome data consistently reported to the state of Colorado from 2000 through 2015.

PROCEDURES Data were collected for dogs and cats each year during the study period on 5 annual scales: number of animals taken in, number of animals taken in/1,000 state residents, animal outcomes as a percentage of intakes (species-specific scales), and annual live release rate as a function of intakes and outcomes. Aggregate data were analyzed for temporal trends by linear regression modeling.

RESULTS Decreases in annual intake and euthanasia rates and a concurrent increase in live release rate were observed for both species. The decreases observed for cats from 2008 through 2015 contrasted with the previously reported findings of increased rates of intake and euthanasia from 2000 through 2007.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE We believe that these temporal trends suggested substantial improvements in intake and outcome data for sheltered cats and dogs across Colorado that reflected changes in unhoused animal populations, along with the impact of resource allocation to spay-neuter programs, adoption marketing, intershelter transfers, and evidence-based improvements in operations. The findings indicated that consistent data collection and interorganizational collaboration can be used to optimize animal shelter capacity and outcomes across a statewide shelter system.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To measure temporal trends in animal shelter and rescue intakes and outcomes for dogs and cats in Colorado from 2000 through 2015 and compare trends from 2008 through 2015 with previously reported trends from 2000 through 2007.

DESIGN Serial cross-sectional study.

SAMPLE 76 animal shelter and rescue facilities with annual intake and outcome data consistently reported to the state of Colorado from 2000 through 2015.

PROCEDURES Data were collected for dogs and cats each year during the study period on 5 annual scales: number of animals taken in, number of animals taken in/1,000 state residents, animal outcomes as a percentage of intakes (species-specific scales), and annual live release rate as a function of intakes and outcomes. Aggregate data were analyzed for temporal trends by linear regression modeling.

RESULTS Decreases in annual intake and euthanasia rates and a concurrent increase in live release rate were observed for both species. The decreases observed for cats from 2008 through 2015 contrasted with the previously reported findings of increased rates of intake and euthanasia from 2000 through 2007.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE We believe that these temporal trends suggested substantial improvements in intake and outcome data for sheltered cats and dogs across Colorado that reflected changes in unhoused animal populations, along with the impact of resource allocation to spay-neuter programs, adoption marketing, intershelter transfers, and evidence-based improvements in operations. The findings indicated that consistent data collection and interorganizational collaboration can be used to optimize animal shelter capacity and outcomes across a statewide shelter system.

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Morris (kevin.morris@du.edu).
Cover Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Publication Date:
01 Feb 2019

  • 1. Shelter Animals Count. Animal data summary. Available at: shelteranimalscount.org/data/Explore-the-Data/dataset. Accessed Jan 8, 2017.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • 2. Zawistowski S, Morris J, Salman MD, et al. Population dynamics, overpopulation and the welfare of companion animals: new insights on old and new data. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 1998;1:193–206.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • 3. White SC, Jefferson E, Levy JK. Impact of publicly sponsored neutering programs on animal population dynamics at animal shelters: the New Hampshire and Austin experiences. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2010;13:191–212.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • 4. Lord LK, Wittum TE, Ferketich AK, et al. Demographic trends for animal care and control agencies in Ohio from 1996 to 2004. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006;229:48–54.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • 5. Sinski JB, Gagne P. Give me shelter: the state of animal sheltering in Kentucky's county shelter system. Contemp Justice Rev 2016;19:250–266.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • 6. Wenstrup J, Dowidchuk A. Pet overpopulation: data measurement issues in shelters. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 1999;2:303–319.

  • 7. Colorado Department of Agriculture. Pet Animal Care Facilities Act (PACFA). Available at: www.colorado.gov/pacific/aginspection/pacfa. Accessed Oct 21, 2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • 8. Morris KN, Wolf JL, Gies DL. Trends in intake and outcome data for animal shelters in Colorado, 2000–2007. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2011;238:329–336.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • 9. Scarlett JM. Interface of epidemiology, pet population issues and policy. Prev Vet Med 2008;86:188–197.

  • 10. Morris KN, Gies DL. Trends in intake and outcome data for animal shelters in a large US Metropolitan area, 1989 to 2010. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2014;17:59–72.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • 11. Institute for Human-Animal Connection. Colorado animal shelter data trends 2000–2013 discussion group notes. Available at: www.du.edu/humananimalconnection/media/documents/pacfa-ihac-discussion.pdf. Accessed Nov 11, 2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • 12. Colorado Division of Local Government State Demography Office. Colorado county population forecasts in 1-year increments. Available at: demography.dola.colorado.gov/population/data/profile-county/. Accessed Oct 21, 2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • 13. Colorado Pet Overpopulation Fund. Available at: coloradopetfund.org. Accessed Feb 24, 2017.

  • 14. Weiss E, Miller K, Mohan-Gibbons H, et al. Why did you choose this pet? Adopters and pet selection preferences in five animal shelters in the United States. Animals (Basel) 2012;2:144–159.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • 15. Metro Denver Animal Welfare Alliance. Available at: www.mdawalliance.org/. Accessed Feb 24, 2017.

  • 16. Colorado Federation of Animal Welfare Agencies. Available at www.cfawa.org/cpages/home. Accessed Feb 24, 2017.

  • 17. Fantuzzi JM, Miller KA, Weiss E. Factors relevant to adoption of cats in an animal shelter. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2010;13:174–179.

  • 18. Weiss E, Gramann S. A comparison of attachment levels of adopters of cats: free-based adoptions versus free adoptions. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2009;12:360–370.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • 19. Slater MR, Miller KA, Weiss E, et al. A survey of the methods used in shelter and rescue programs to identify feral and frightened pet cats. J Feline Med Surg 2010;12:592–600.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • 20. Scarlett J, Johnston N. Impact of a subsidized spay neuter clinic on impounds and euthanasia on a community shelter and on service and complaint calls to animal control. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2012;15:53–69.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • 21. Hawes S, Ikizler D, Loughney K, et al. Legislating components of a humane city: the economic impacts of the Austin, Texas “no kill” resolution (City of Austin Resolution 20091105–040). Available at: animalstudiesrepository.org/anilleg/1. Accessed Dec 22, 2018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • 22. Morris K, Evans R, Smith S, et al. Oklahoma Humane Society Compassion Center Economic Impact Study. Available at: animalstudiesrepository.org/humsrorg/2. Accessed Dec 22, 2018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement