Evaluation of various hemostatic knot configurations performed by veterinary students

Gessica Giusto Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco TO, Italy.

Search for other papers by Gessica Giusto in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Francesco Comino Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco TO, Italy.

Search for other papers by Francesco Comino in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Cristina Vercelli Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco TO, Italy.

Search for other papers by Cristina Vercelli in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Vittorio Caramello Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco TO, Italy.

Search for other papers by Vittorio Caramello in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Emanuela Morello Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco TO, Italy.

Search for other papers by Emanuela Morello in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
Marco Gandini Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco TO, Italy.

Search for other papers by Marco Gandini in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine the most effective hemostatic knot configuration performed by veterinary students following a brief training session with an experienced surgeon and a subsequent deliberate self-training period.

DESIGN Experiment.

SAMPLE 24 fourth-year veterinary students with no previous surgical knot–tying experience.

PROCEDURES In a 1-hour training session, an experienced surgeon showed veterinary students how to perform 5 hemostatic knot configurations (giant, slip, strangle, surgeon's, and transfixing), which they then practiced at home on a hemostasis simulator for 2 weeks. Thereafter, students performed each knot 4 times (twice each with monofilament and multifilament suture) on a hemostasis simulator. An experienced surgeon evaluated the correct execution of knots and measured their effectiveness by use of a manometer to measure vessel pressure distal to the ligature. Each student completed a questionnaire regarding their perceived learning and execution difficulty and sealing security for each knot. Responses were compared among knots and suture materials.

RESULTS Overall, students considered the surgeon's knot the easiest to learn and the strangle knot the most difficult. The slipknot was also considered the easiest knot to perform, and the giant knot was considered the most difficult. The strangle knot was deemed the most effective in reducing vessel pressure distal to the ligature.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE The strangle knot was the most effective hemostatic knot in inexperienced hands, although veterinary students considered it more difficult to learn than other, perhaps more commonly taught, knots. Therefore, teaching of the strangle knot should be encouraged in veterinary schools.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine the most effective hemostatic knot configuration performed by veterinary students following a brief training session with an experienced surgeon and a subsequent deliberate self-training period.

DESIGN Experiment.

SAMPLE 24 fourth-year veterinary students with no previous surgical knot–tying experience.

PROCEDURES In a 1-hour training session, an experienced surgeon showed veterinary students how to perform 5 hemostatic knot configurations (giant, slip, strangle, surgeon's, and transfixing), which they then practiced at home on a hemostasis simulator for 2 weeks. Thereafter, students performed each knot 4 times (twice each with monofilament and multifilament suture) on a hemostasis simulator. An experienced surgeon evaluated the correct execution of knots and measured their effectiveness by use of a manometer to measure vessel pressure distal to the ligature. Each student completed a questionnaire regarding their perceived learning and execution difficulty and sealing security for each knot. Responses were compared among knots and suture materials.

RESULTS Overall, students considered the surgeon's knot the easiest to learn and the strangle knot the most difficult. The slipknot was also considered the easiest knot to perform, and the giant knot was considered the most difficult. The strangle knot was deemed the most effective in reducing vessel pressure distal to the ligature.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE The strangle knot was the most effective hemostatic knot in inexperienced hands, although veterinary students considered it more difficult to learn than other, perhaps more commonly taught, knots. Therefore, teaching of the strangle knot should be encouraged in veterinary schools.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplementary Appendix S1 (PDF 52 kb)

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Gandini (marco.gandini@unito.it).
  • 1 van Empel PJ, Verdam MGE, Huirne JA, et al. Open knot-tying skills: resident skills assessed. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2013;39:10301036.

  • 2 Sanfey HA, Dunnington GL. Basic surgical skills testing for junior residents: current views of general surgery program directors. J Am Coll Surg 2011;212:406412.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3 Giusto G, Comino F, Gandini M. Validation of an effective, easy-to-make hemostasis simulator. J Vet Med Educ 2015;42:8588.

  • 4 Bath J, Lawrence PF. Twelve tips for developing and implementing an effective surgical simulation programme. Med Teach 2012;34:192197.

  • 5 Thomas AC, Hayes GM, Demetriou JL. Comparison of veterinary student ability to learn 1-handed and 2-handed techniques for surgical knot tying. Vet Surg 2015;44:798802.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6 Ching SS, Mok CW, Koh YX, et al. Assessment of surgical trainees' quality of knot-tying. J Surg Educ 2013;70:4854.

  • 7 Smeak DD, Hill LN, Lord LK, et al. Expected frequency of use and proficiency of core surgical skills in entry-level veterinary practice: 2009 ACVS core surgical skills diplomate survey results. Vet Surg 2012;41:853861.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8 Jensen AR, Wright AS, Levy AE, et al. Acquiring basic surgical skills: is a faculty mentor really needed? Am J Surg 2009;197:8288.

  • 9 Wright AS, McKenzie J, Tsigonis A, et al. A structured self-directed basic skills curriculum results in improved technical performance in the absence of expert faculty teaching. Surgery 2012;151:808814.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10 Pender C, Kiselov V, Qingzhao Y, et al. All for knots: evaluating the effectiveness of a proficiency-driven, simulation-based knot tying and suturing curriculum for medical students during their third-year surgery clerkship. Am J Surg 2017;213:362370.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11 Xeroulis GJ, Park J, Moulton CA, et al. Teaching suturing and knot tying skills to medical students: a randomized controlled study comparing computer-based video instruction and (concurrent and summary) expert feedback. Surgery 2007;141:442449.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12 Rogers DA, Regehr G, Howdieshell TR, et al. The impact of external feedback on computer-assisted learning for surgical technical skill training. Am J Surg 2000;179:341343.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13 Comino F, Giusto G, Caramello V, et al. Ex vivo comparison of the giant knot and transfixing knot in equine open and closed castration. Equine Vet J 2016;48:765769.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14 Gandini M, Giusto G, Comino F, et al. Parallel alternating sliding knots are effective for ligation of mesenteric arteries during resection and anastomosis of the equine jejunum. BMC Vet Res 2014;10(suppl 1):S1S10.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15 Hazenfield KM, Smeak DD. In vitro holding security of six friction knots used as a first throw in the creation of a vascular ligation. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2014;245:571577

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16 Schwarzkopf I, Van Goethem B, Vandekerckhove PM, et al. Vessel sealing versus suture ligation for canine ovarian pedicle haemostasis: a randomized clinical trial. Vet Rec 2015:176:125.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17 Muffly TM, Kow N, Iqbal I, et al. Minimum number of throws needed for knot security. J Surg Educ 2011;68:130133.

  • 18 Babetty Z, Sumer A, Altintas S. Knot properties of alternating sliding knots with different patterns in comparison to alternating and simple sliding knots. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186:485489.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19 Smeak DD, Hazenfield KM. Creating a leak-proof ligature with confidence part 2: step–by-step approach to surgical binding knots. Today's Vet Pract 2015;5:7580.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20 Leitch BJ, Bray JP, Kim NJ, et al. Pedicle ligation in ovariohysterectomy: an in vitro study of ligation techniques. J Small Anim Pract 2012;53:592598.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21 Trimbos JB, Brohim R, van Rijssel FJ. Factors relating to the volume of surgical knots. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1989;30:355359.

  • 22 Good MM, Good LB, McIntire DD, et al. Surgical knot integrity: effect of suture type and caliber, and level of residency training. J Surg Educ 2013;70:156160.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement