• 1. Walsh F. Human-animal bonds I: the relational significance of companion animals. Fam Process 2009;48:462–480.

  • 2. Wensley SP. Animal welfare and the human-animal bond: considerations for veterinary faculty, students, and practitioners. J Vet Med Educ 2008;35:532–539.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Coe JB, Young I, Lambert K, et al. A scoping review of published research on the relinquishment of companion animals. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2014;17:253–273.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Patronek GJ, Glickman LT & Beck AM. Risk factors for relinquishment of dogs to an animal shelter. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996;209:572–581.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. Diesel G, Brodbelt D & Pfeiffer DU. Characteristics of relinquished dogs and their owners at 14 rehoming centers in the United Kingdom. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2010;13:15–30.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Kwan JY & Bain MJ. Owner attachment and problem behaviors related to relinquishment and training techniques of dogs. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2013;16:168–183.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Scott JP & Fuller JL. Genetics and the social behavior of the dog. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965.

  • 8. Freedman DG, King JA & Elliot O. Critical period in the social development of dogs. Science 1961;133:1016–1017.

  • 9. Duxbury MM, Jackson JA, Line SW, et al. Evaluation of association between retention in the home and attendance at puppy socialization classes. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003;223:61–66.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Biernacki P & Waldorf D. Snowball sampling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociol Methods Res 1981;10:141–163.

  • 11. Patronek GJ & Dodman NH. Attitudes, procedures, and delivery of behavior services by veterinarians in small animal practice. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999;215:1606–1611.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Salman MD, Hutchison J, Ruch-Gallie R, et al. Behavioral reasons for relinquishment of dogs and cats to 12 shelters. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2000;3:93–106.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Landsberg GM, Hunthausen WL & Ackerman LJ. Handbook of behavior problems of the dog and cat. St Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2012;39–64.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Dohoo IR, Martin SW & Stryhn H. Veterinary epidemiologic research. 2nd ed. Charlottetown, PEI: AVC Inc, 2009;285.

  • 15. Overall K. Manual of clinical behavioral medicine for dogs and cats. St Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2013;123–124.

  • 16. Kutsumi A, Nagasawa M, Ohta M, et al. Importance of puppy training for future behavior of the dog. J Vet Med Sci 2013;75:141–149.

  • 17. Arai S, Ohtani N & Ohta M. Importance of bringing dogs in contact with children during their socialization period for better behavior. J Vet Med Sci 2011;73:747–752.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Blackwell EJ, Bradshaw JWS & Casey RA. Fear responses to noises in domestic dogs: prevalence, risk factors and cooccurrence with other fear related behaviour. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2013;145:15–25.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Lord LK, Reider L, Herron ME, et al. Health and behavior problems in dogs and cats one week and one month after adoption from animal shelters. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008;233:1715–1722.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Welborn LV, Davies JG, Ford R, et al. 2011 AAHA canine vaccination guidelines. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2011;47:1–42.

  • 21. American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior. AVSAB position statement on puppy socialization. Available at: avsabonline.org/uploads/position_statements/Puppy_Socialization_Position_download_-_10-4-14.pdf. Accessed Oct 4, 2014.

  • 22. Seksel K, Mazurski EJ & Taylor A. Puppy socialisation programs: short and long term behavioural effects. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1999;62:335–349.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23. Stepita ME, Bain MJ & Kass PH. Frequency of CPV infection in vaccinated puppies that attended puppy socialization classes. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2013;49:95–100.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24. Herron ME, Shofer FS & Reisner IR. Survey of the use and outcome of confrontational and non-confrontational training methods in client-owned dogs showing undesired behaviors. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2009;117:47–54.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25. Hiby EF & Rooney NJ. Dog training methods: their use, effectiveness and interaction with behaviour and welfare. Anim Welf 2004;13:63–69.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement

Puppy socialization practices of a sample of dog owners from across Canada and the United States

Janet H. CutlerDepartment of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

Search for other papers by Janet H. Cutler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Jason B. CoeDepartment of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

Search for other papers by Jason B. Coe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
, and
Lee NielDepartment of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

Search for other papers by Lee Niel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
View More View Less

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To identify actions taken by owners to socialize puppies < 20 weeks of age, to determine factors affecting attendance of structured puppy classes, and to examine associations between class attendance and owner response to various undesirable puppy behaviors.

DESIGN Cross-sectional study.

SAMPLE 296 puppy owners (each with 1 puppy).

PROCEDURES Participants completed a survey at enrollment (to gather data regarding owner demographics and puppy characteristics) and again when puppies were 20 weeks of age (to gather information on socialization practices and owner responses to misbehavior and signs of fear in their puppy). Responses were compared between owners that did (attendees) and did not (nonattendees) report attending puppy classes.

RESULTS 145 (49.0%) respondents reported attending puppy classes. Class structure differed greatly among respondents. Attendees exposed their puppies to a greater number of people and other dogs than nonattendees as well as to various noises and situations. Puppies of attendees were less likely than puppies of nonattendees to have signs of fear in response to noises such as thunder and vacuum cleaners as well as to crates. Fewer attendees reported use of punishment-based discipline techniques than did nonattendees. Almost one-third of puppies received only minimal exposure to people and dogs outside the home during the survey period.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE A notable number of puppies < 20 weeks of age in this study received few early socialization opportunities, which could lead to behavior problems and subsequent relinquishment. Opportunities exist for veterinarians to serve an important role in educating puppy owners about the importance of early puppy socialization and positive reward training.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To identify actions taken by owners to socialize puppies < 20 weeks of age, to determine factors affecting attendance of structured puppy classes, and to examine associations between class attendance and owner response to various undesirable puppy behaviors.

DESIGN Cross-sectional study.

SAMPLE 296 puppy owners (each with 1 puppy).

PROCEDURES Participants completed a survey at enrollment (to gather data regarding owner demographics and puppy characteristics) and again when puppies were 20 weeks of age (to gather information on socialization practices and owner responses to misbehavior and signs of fear in their puppy). Responses were compared between owners that did (attendees) and did not (nonattendees) report attending puppy classes.

RESULTS 145 (49.0%) respondents reported attending puppy classes. Class structure differed greatly among respondents. Attendees exposed their puppies to a greater number of people and other dogs than nonattendees as well as to various noises and situations. Puppies of attendees were less likely than puppies of nonattendees to have signs of fear in response to noises such as thunder and vacuum cleaners as well as to crates. Fewer attendees reported use of punishment-based discipline techniques than did nonattendees. Almost one-third of puppies received only minimal exposure to people and dogs outside the home during the survey period.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE A notable number of puppies < 20 weeks of age in this study received few early socialization opportunities, which could lead to behavior problems and subsequent relinquishment. Opportunities exist for veterinarians to serve an important role in educating puppy owners about the importance of early puppy socialization and positive reward training.

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Coe (jcoe@uoguelph.ca).