1. Runge JJ, Mayhew PD. Evaluation of single port access gastropexy and ovariectomy using articulating instruments and angled telescopes in dogs. Vet Surg 2013; 42: 807–813.
2. Islam A, Castellivi AO, Tesfay ST, et al. Early surgeon impressions and technical difficulty associated with laparoscopic single-site surgery: a Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons learning Center Study. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 2597–2603.
3. KARL STORZ GmbH and Co KG. ENDOCONE, a novel port for single portal laparoscopic surgery. Tuttlingen, Germany: KARL STORZ GmbH and Co KG, 2010. Available at: www.cempitaly.com/images/endocone.pdf. Accessed Jun 9, 2014.
4. Liatsikos E, Kallidonis P, Do M, et al. LESS nephrectomy: technique and outcomes. Arch Esp Urol 2012; 65: 294–302.
5. Case JB, Ellison G. Single incision laparoscopic-assisted intestinal surgery (SILAIS) in 7 dogs and 1 cat. Vet Surg 2013; 42: 629–634.
6. Rawlings CA Mahaffey MB, Bement S, et al. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted gastropexy in dogs susceptible to gastric dilatation. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 221: 1576–1581.
7. Brockman DJ, Washabau RJ, Drobatz KJ. Canine gastric dilatation/volvulus syndrome in a veterinary critical care unit: 295 cases (1986–1992). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995; 207: 460–464.
8. Evans KM, Adams VJ. Mortality and morbidity due to gastric dilatation-volvulus syndrome in pedigree dogs in the UK. J Small Anim Pract 2010; 51: 376–381.
9. Glickman LT, Glickman NW, Schellenberg DB, et al. Incidence of and breed-related risk factors for gastric dilatation-volvulus in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000; 216: 40–45.
10. Culp WTN, Mayhew PD, Brown DC. The effect of laparoscopic versus open ovariectomy on postsurgical activity in small dogs. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 811–817.
11. Mayhew PD, Brown DC. Prospective evaluation of two intracorporeally sutured prophylactic laparoscopic gastropexy techniques compared with laparoscopic-assisted gastropexy in dogs. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 738–746.
12. Yim GW, Jung YW, Paek J, et al. Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 26.e1–26.e6.
13. Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Scambia G, et al. Laparoendoscopic single site surgery for total hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010; 109: 76–77.
14. Rivier P, Furneaux R, Viguier E. Combined laparoscopic ovariectomy and laparoscopic-assisted gastropexy in dogs susceptible to gastric dilatation-volvulus. Can Vet J 2011; 52: 62–66.
15. Coisman JG, Case JB, Clark ND, et al. Efficacy of decontamination and sterilization of a single-use single-incision laparoscopic surgery port. Am J Vet Res 2013; 74: 934–938.
16. Chan ACW, Ip M, Koehler A, et al. Is it safe to reuse disposable laparoscopic trocars? An in vitro testing. Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 1042–1044.
17. Roth K, Heeg P, Reichl R. Specific hygiene issues relating to re-processing and reuse of single-use devices for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2002; 16: 1091–1097.
18. Manassero M, Leperlier D, Vallefuoco R, et al. Laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs using a single-port multiple-access device. Vet Rec 2012; 171: 69.
Advertisement
OBJECTIVE To describe the technique, clinical findings, and short-term outcome in dogs undergoing laparoscopic-assisted incisional gastropexy with a reusable single-incision surgery port.
DESIGN Retrospective case series.
ANIMALS 14 client-owned dogs.
PROCEDURES Medical records of dogs referred for elective laparoscopic gastropexy between June 2012 and August 2013 were reviewed. History, signalment, results of physical examination and preoperative laboratory testing, surgical procedure, duration of surgery, postoperative complications, duration of hospital stay, and short-term outcome were recorded. All patients underwent general anesthesia and were positioned in dorsal recumbency. After an initial limited laparoscopic exploration, single-incision laparoscopic-assisted gastropexy was performed extracorporeally in all dogs via a conical port placed in a right paramedian location. Concurrent procedures included laparoscopic ovariectomy (n = 4), gastric biopsy (2), and castration (7). Short-term outcome was evaluated.
RESULTS Median duration of surgery was 76 minutes (range, 40 to 90 minutes). Intraoperative complications were minor and consisted of loss of pneumoperitoneum in 2 of 14 dogs. A postoperative surgical site infection occurred in 1 dog and resolved with standard treatment. Median duration of follow-up was 371 days (range, 2 weeks to 1.5 years). No dogs developed gastric dilation–volvulus during the follow-up period, and all owners were satisfied with the outcome.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results suggested that single-incision laparoscopic-assisted gastropexy with a reusable conical port was feasible and effective in appropriately selected cases. Investigation of the potential benefits of this reusable port versus single-use devices for elective gastropexy in dogs is warranted.