Sedation and mechanical hypoalgesia after sublingual administration of detomidine hydrochloride gel to donkeys

Ignacio LizarragaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Ross University, Basseterre, St Kitts and Nevis.

Search for other papers by Ignacio Lizarraga in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MVZ, MVSc, PhD
,
Fernanda Castillo-AlcalaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Ross University, Basseterre, St Kitts and Nevis.

Search for other papers by Fernanda Castillo-Alcala in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MVZ, DVSc
,
Kelley M. VarnerDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Ross University, Basseterre, St Kitts and Nevis.

Search for other papers by Kelley M. Varner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
, and
Lauren S. RobinsonDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Ross University, Basseterre, St Kitts and Nevis.

Search for other papers by Lauren S. Robinson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
View More View Less

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare sedative and mechanical hypoalgesic effects of sublingual administration of 2 doses of detomidine gel to donkeys.

DESIGN Randomized blinded controlled trial.

ANIMALS 6 healthy castrated male donkeys.

PROCEDURES In a crossover study design, donkeys received each of the following sublingual treatments 1 week apart in a randomly assigned order: 1 mL of molasses (D0) or detomidine hydrochloride gel at 20 μg/kg (9 μg/lb; D20) or 40 μg/kg (18 μg/lb; D40). Sedation score (SS), head height above the ground (HHAG), and mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) were assessed before and for 180 minutes after treatment. Areas under the effect change-versus-time curves (AUCs) from 0 to 30, 30 to 60, 60 to 120, and 120 to 180 minutes after administration were computed for SS, HHAG, and MNT and compared among treatments.

RESULTS D20 and D40 resulted in greater SS AUCs from 60 to 120 minutes and smaller HHAG AUCs from 30 through 180 minutes than did D0. The D40 resulted in smaller HHAG AUCs from 60 to 120 minutes than did D20. Compared with D0 values, MNT AUCs from 60 to 120 minutes were higher for D20, whereas MNT AUCs from 30 through 180 minutes were higher for D40.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE D20 and D40 induced sedation and mechanical hypoalgesia in donkeys by > 30 minutes after administration, but only sedation was dose dependent. Sublingual administration of detomidine gel at 40 μg/kg may be useful for sedation of standing donkeys prior to potentially painful minor procedures.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare sedative and mechanical hypoalgesic effects of sublingual administration of 2 doses of detomidine gel to donkeys.

DESIGN Randomized blinded controlled trial.

ANIMALS 6 healthy castrated male donkeys.

PROCEDURES In a crossover study design, donkeys received each of the following sublingual treatments 1 week apart in a randomly assigned order: 1 mL of molasses (D0) or detomidine hydrochloride gel at 20 μg/kg (9 μg/lb; D20) or 40 μg/kg (18 μg/lb; D40). Sedation score (SS), head height above the ground (HHAG), and mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT) were assessed before and for 180 minutes after treatment. Areas under the effect change-versus-time curves (AUCs) from 0 to 30, 30 to 60, 60 to 120, and 120 to 180 minutes after administration were computed for SS, HHAG, and MNT and compared among treatments.

RESULTS D20 and D40 resulted in greater SS AUCs from 60 to 120 minutes and smaller HHAG AUCs from 30 through 180 minutes than did D0. The D40 resulted in smaller HHAG AUCs from 60 to 120 minutes than did D20. Compared with D0 values, MNT AUCs from 60 to 120 minutes were higher for D20, whereas MNT AUCs from 30 through 180 minutes were higher for D40.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE D20 and D40 induced sedation and mechanical hypoalgesia in donkeys by > 30 minutes after administration, but only sedation was dose dependent. Sublingual administration of detomidine gel at 40 μg/kg may be useful for sedation of standing donkeys prior to potentially painful minor procedures.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Castillo-Alcala's present address is Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, 4474, New Zealand.

Address correspondence to Dr. Lizarraga (madrigal@unam.mx).
  • 1. Ashley FH, Waterman-Pearson AE, Whay HR. Behavioural assessment of pain in horses and donkeys: application to clinical practice and future studies. Equine Vet J 2005; 37:565575.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. Lizarraga I, Sumano H, Brumbaugh GW. Pharmacological and pharmacokinetic differences between donkeys and horses. Equine Vet Educ 2004; 16:102112.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Grint NJ, Murrell JC, Whay HR. Investigating the opinions of donkey owners and veterinary surgeons towards pain and analgesia in donkeys. Equine Vet Educ 2015; 27:365371.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Mostafa MB, Farag KA, Zomor E, et al. The sedative and analgesic effects of detomidine (Domosedan) in donkeys. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A 1995; 42:351356.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. El-Maghraby HM, Atta AH. Sedative and analgesic effects of detomidine with and without butorphanol in donkeys. Assiut Vet Med J 1997; 37:201211.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Joubert KE, Briggs P, Gerber D, et al. The sedative and analgesic effects of detomidine-butorphanol and detomidine alone in donkeys. J S Afr Vet Assoc 1999; 70:112118.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Lizarraga I, Janovyak E. Comparison of the mechanical hypoalgesic effects of five α2-adrenoceptor agonists in donkeys. Vet Rec 2013; 173:294.

  • 8. El-Kammar MH, Gad SB. Evaluation of the sedative, analgesic, clinicophysiological and haematological effects of intravenous detomidine, detomidine-butorphanol, romifidine and romifidine-butorphanol in standing donkeys. Equine Vet Educ 2014; 26:202207.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. El-Kammar MH, Gad SB. Antagonism of detomidine-induced sedation, analgesia, clinicophysiological, and haematobio-chemical effects in donkeys using IV tolazoline or atipamezole. J Equine Vet Sci 2014; 34:784792.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Lizarraga I, Castillo-Alcala F, Varner KM, et al. Sedation and mechanical antinociception after intravenous administration of detomidine in donkeys: a dosage-effect study. Vet Rec 2015; 176:202.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Law Revision Commissioner. Saint Christopher and Nevis. Chapter 11.04. Protection of Animals Act, Revised edition showing the law as at 31 December 2002. Available at: www.rossu.edu/veterinary-school/News/documents/Cap11.04.pdf. Accessed Mar 7, 2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Federation of Animal Science Societies. Guide for the care and use of agricultural animals in research and teaching. 3rd ed. Champaign, Ill: Federation of Animal Science Societies, 2010.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Lizarraga I, Castillo-Alcala F. Sedative and mechanical hypoalgesic effects of butorphanol in xylazine-premedicated donkeys. Equine Vet J 2015; 47:308312.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Lizarraga I, Beths T. A comparative study of xylazine-induced mechanical hypoalgesia in donkeys and horses. Vet Anaesth Analg 2012; 39:533538.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Riviere JE. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination. In: Riviere JE, Papich MG, eds. Veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics. 9th ed. Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009;1146.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Kaukinen H, Aspegrén J, Hyyppä S, et al. Bioavailability of detomidine administered sublingually to horses as an oromucosal gel. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2011; 34:7681.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. L'Ami JJ, Vermunt LE, van Loon JP, et al. Sublingual administration of detomidine in horses: sedative effect, analgesia and detection time. Vet J 2013; 196:253259.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Clarke KW, Trim CM, Hall LW. Anaesthesia of the horse. In: Clarke KW, Trim CM, Hall LW, eds. Veterinary anaesthesia. 11th ed. London: Elsevier, 2014;245311.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Knych HK, Stanley SD. Effects of three antagonists on selected pharmacodynamic effects of sublingually administered detomidine in the horse. Vet Anaesth Analg 2014; 41:3647.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Gardner RB, White GW, Ramsey DS, et al. Efficacy of sublingual administration of detomidine gel for sedation of horses undergoing veterinary and husbandry procedures under field conditions. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2010; 237:14591464.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. Hokkanen A-H, Raekallio MR, Salla K, et al. Sublingual administration of detomidine to calves prior to disbudding: a comparison with the intravenous route. Vet Anaesth Analg 2014; 41:372377.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Hopfensperger MJ, Messenger KM, Papich MK, et al. The use of oral transmucosal detomidine hydrochloride gel to facilitate handling in dogs. J Vet Behav 2013; 8:114123.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23. Love EJ, Murrell J, Whay HR. Thermal and mechanical nociceptive threshold testing in horses: a review. Vet Anaesth Analg 2011; 38:314.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24. Grint NJ, Beths T, Yvorchuk K, et al. The influence of various confounding factors on mechanical nociceptive thresholds in the donkey. Vet Anaesth Analg 2014; 41:421429.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25. Chambers JP, Waterman AE, Livingston A. Further development of equipment to measure nociceptive thresholds in large animals. Vet Anaesth Analg 1994; 21:6672.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26. Malone JH, Clarke KW. A comparison of the efficacy of detomidine by sublingual and intramuscular administration in ponies. Vet Anaesth Analg 1993; 20:7377.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27. DiMaio Knych HK, Stanley SD. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of detomidine following sublingual administration to horses. Am J Vet Res 2011; 72:13781385.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement