Safety and clinical effectiveness of a compounded sustained-release formulation of buprenorphine for postoperative analgesia in New Zealand White rabbits

Louis DiVincenti Jr Department of Comparative Medicine, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642.

Search for other papers by Louis DiVincenti Jr in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
Luiz A. D. Meirelles Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642.

Search for other papers by Luiz A. D. Meirelles in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DDS, PhD
, and
Robin A. Westcott Division of Laboratory Animal Medicine, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642.

Search for other papers by Robin A. Westcott in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BS

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine the clinical effectiveness and safety of a compounded sustained-release formulation of buprenorphine, compared with effects of regular buprenorphine, for postoperative analgesia in rabbits.

DESIGN Blinded randomized controlled clinical trial.

ANIMALS 24 purpose-bred adult male New Zealand White rabbits.

PROCEDURES Rabbits received titanium implants in each tibia as part of another study. Immediately prior to surgery, each rabbit received regular buprenorphine hydrochloride (0.02 mg/kg [0.009 mg/lb], SC, q 12 h for 3 days) or 1 dose of a compounded sustained-release formulation of buprenorphine (0.12 mg/kg [0.055 mg/lb], SC) followed by an equal volume of saline (0.9% NaCl) solution (SC, q 12 h for 3 days) after surgery. For 7 days after surgery, rabbits were evaluated for signs of pain by means of rabbit grimace and activity scoring and for adverse effects.

RESULTS No significant differences were identified between treatment groups in grimace and activity scores at any point. No major adverse effects were detected for either drug. However, 3 rabbits that received regular buprenorphine had pain scores suggestive of moderate to severe pain by the time dose admininistration was due (ie, within the 12-hour administration interval). No clinically important differences were detected in intraoperative anesthetic or postoperative recovery variables.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Sustained-release buprenorphine administered SC at 0.12 mg/kg was at least as effective as regular buprenorphine in providing analgesia for rabbits following orthopedic surgery without any major adverse effects. This sustained-release formulation represents an important alternative for rabbit analgesia with potential to improve rabbit welfare over existing analgesic standards. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2016;248:795–801)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine the clinical effectiveness and safety of a compounded sustained-release formulation of buprenorphine, compared with effects of regular buprenorphine, for postoperative analgesia in rabbits.

DESIGN Blinded randomized controlled clinical trial.

ANIMALS 24 purpose-bred adult male New Zealand White rabbits.

PROCEDURES Rabbits received titanium implants in each tibia as part of another study. Immediately prior to surgery, each rabbit received regular buprenorphine hydrochloride (0.02 mg/kg [0.009 mg/lb], SC, q 12 h for 3 days) or 1 dose of a compounded sustained-release formulation of buprenorphine (0.12 mg/kg [0.055 mg/lb], SC) followed by an equal volume of saline (0.9% NaCl) solution (SC, q 12 h for 3 days) after surgery. For 7 days after surgery, rabbits were evaluated for signs of pain by means of rabbit grimace and activity scoring and for adverse effects.

RESULTS No significant differences were identified between treatment groups in grimace and activity scores at any point. No major adverse effects were detected for either drug. However, 3 rabbits that received regular buprenorphine had pain scores suggestive of moderate to severe pain by the time dose admininistration was due (ie, within the 12-hour administration interval). No clinically important differences were detected in intraoperative anesthetic or postoperative recovery variables.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Sustained-release buprenorphine administered SC at 0.12 mg/kg was at least as effective as regular buprenorphine in providing analgesia for rabbits following orthopedic surgery without any major adverse effects. This sustained-release formulation represents an important alternative for rabbit analgesia with potential to improve rabbit welfare over existing analgesic standards. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2016;248:795–801)

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. DiVincenti (louis_divincenti@urmc.rochester.edu).
  • 1. AVMA. 2012 US pet ownership and demographics sourcebook. Schaumburg, Ill: AVMA, 2012. Available at: www.avma.org/reference/marketstats/sourcebook.asp. Accessed Oct 20, 2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. Leach MC, Allweiler S, Richardson C, et al. Behavioural effects of ovariohysterectomy and oral administration of meloxicam in laboratory housed rabbits. Res Vet Sci 2009; 87:336347.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Lascelles BD, Capner CA, Waterman-Pearson AE. Current British attitudes to perioperative analgesia for cats and small mammals. Vet Rec 1999; 145:601604.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Pascoe PJ. Opioid analgesics. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2000; 30:757772.

  • 5. Coulter CA, Flecknell PA, Leach MC, et al. Reported analgesic administration to rabbits undergoing experimental surgical procedures. BMC Vet Res 2011; 7:1218.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Flecknell PA, Richardson CA, Popovic A, et al. Anesthesia and immobilization of small mammals. In: Grimm KA, Tranquilli WJ, Lamont LA, eds. Essentials of small animal anesthesia and analgesia. 2nd ed. Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011;300325.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Su B, O'Connor JP. NSAID therapy effects on healing of bone, tendon, and the enthesis. J Appl Physiol 2013; 115:892899.

  • 8. Weaver LA, Blaze CA, Linder DE, et al. A model for clinical evaluation of perioperative analgesia in rabbits. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 2010; 49:845851.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. Murphy KL, Roughan JV, Baxter MG, et al. Anesthesia with combination of ketamine and medetomidine in the rabbit: effect of premedication with buprenorphine. Vet Anaesth Analg 2010; 37:222229.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Lamont LA, Matthews KA. Opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, and analgesic adjuvants. In: Tranquilli WJ, Thurmon JC, Grimm KA, eds. Lumb and Jones' veterinary anesthesia and analgesia. 4th ed. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing, 2007;241252.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Cooper CS, Metcalf-Pate KA, Barat CE, et al. Comparison of side effects between buprenorphine and meloxicam used postoperatively in Dutch belted rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 2009; 48:279285.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Catbagan DL, Quimby JM, Mama KR, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and adverse effects of sustained-release buprenorphine following subcutaneous administration and buprenorphine hydrochloride following oral transmucosal administration in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Am J Vet Res 2011; 72:461466.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Foley PL, Liang H, Crichlow AR. Evaluation of a sustained-release formulation of buprenorphine for analgesia in rats. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 2011; 50:198204.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Nunamaker EA, Halliday LC, Moody DE, et al. Pharmacokinetics of 2 formulations of buprenorphine in macaques (Macaca mulatta and Macaca fasicularis). J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 2013; 52:19.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Plumb DC. Plumb's veterinary drug handbook. 5th ed. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell, 2005; 327329.

  • 16. National Research Council. The guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. 8th ed. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2011.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Keating SCJ, Thomas AA, Flecknell PA, et al. Evaluation of EMLA cream for preventing pain during tattooing of rabbits: changes in physiological, behavioural and facial expression responses. PLoS ONE 2012; 7:e44437.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Lester PA, Moore RM, Shuster KA, et al. Anesthesia and analgesia. In: Suckow MA, Stevens KA, Wilson RP, eds. The laboratory rabbit, guinea pig, hamster, and other rodents. London: Elsevier, 2012; 3355.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Gaynor JS, Muir WW III. Handbook of veterinary pain management. St Louis: Mosby, 2009.

  • 20. International Association for the Study of Pain. Part III: pain terms, a current list with definitions and notes on usage. In: Merskey H, Bogduk N, eds. Classification of chronic pain. 2nd ed. Seattle: IASP Press, 1994. Available at: www.iasp-pain.org/Content/NavigationMenu/GeneralResourceLinks/PainDefinitions/default.htm. Accessed Nov 24, 2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. Langford DJ, Baily AL, Chanda ML, et al. Coding of facial expressions of pain in the laboratory mouse. Nat Methods 2010; 7:447449.

  • 22. Carbone ET, Lindstrom KE, Diep S, et al. Duration of action of sustained-release buprenorphine in 2 strains of mice. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 2012; 51:815819.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement