On-site veterinary medical evaluation and care of working dogs and horses at the 2012 Republican National Convention

Jenifer A. Chatfield National Veterinary Response Team, 330 Independence Ave SW, G-644, Washington DC 20201.

Search for other papers by Jenifer A. Chatfield in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Reneé Dewell National Veterinary Response Team, 330 Independence Ave SW, G-644, Washington DC 20201.

Search for other papers by Reneé Dewell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
Astrid J. Miranda MacDill AFB Veterinary Services, 7804 Blackbird St, Bldg 936, MacDill AFB, FL 33621.

Search for other papers by Astrid J. Miranda in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MPH
,
Stefania Wilcox 463rd Medical Detachment Veterinary Service Support, 107 Sigerfoos St, Fort Benning, GA 31905.

Search for other papers by Stefania Wilcox in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
, and
Ty J. Vannieuwenhoven National Veterinary Response Team, 330 Independence Ave SW, G-644, Washington DC 20201.

Search for other papers by Ty J. Vannieuwenhoven in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MPH, MSS

Abstract

Objective—To describe on-site veterinary medical care for working dogs and horses deployed for the 2012 Republican National Convention (RNC) in Tampa, Fla, August 24 to 30, 2012.

Design—Retrospective case series.

Sample—130 dogs and 45 horses.

Procedures—Data collected included breed, age, history, task assignment, reason for evaluation, and physical examination findings. A patient encounter report was recorded each time an animal was seen by veterinary staff for a physical evaluation.

Results—46 of the 130 (35%) dogs and all 45 (100%) horses underwent at least 1 on-site veterinary evaluation, for a total of 478 patient encounters. The most common reason for an on-site veterinary evaluation was a wellness check (446 patient encounters). On the basis of veterinary recommendations, 1 dog and 4 horses were removed from continued service for the duration of the event. In addition, 1 dog and 1 horse were removed from active service for 12 to 24 hours but allowed to return to service for the duration of the event following a veterinary reevaluation.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggested that working dogs and horses deployed for large planned events face different health concerns, compared with concerns previously reported for animals deployed following disasters. Pre-event planning and training of handlers and riders may have helped reduce the number of health concerns, particularly health concerns related to high heat. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2015;247:539–541)

Abstract

Objective—To describe on-site veterinary medical care for working dogs and horses deployed for the 2012 Republican National Convention (RNC) in Tampa, Fla, August 24 to 30, 2012.

Design—Retrospective case series.

Sample—130 dogs and 45 horses.

Procedures—Data collected included breed, age, history, task assignment, reason for evaluation, and physical examination findings. A patient encounter report was recorded each time an animal was seen by veterinary staff for a physical evaluation.

Results—46 of the 130 (35%) dogs and all 45 (100%) horses underwent at least 1 on-site veterinary evaluation, for a total of 478 patient encounters. The most common reason for an on-site veterinary evaluation was a wellness check (446 patient encounters). On the basis of veterinary recommendations, 1 dog and 4 horses were removed from continued service for the duration of the event. In addition, 1 dog and 1 horse were removed from active service for 12 to 24 hours but allowed to return to service for the duration of the event following a veterinary reevaluation.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggested that working dogs and horses deployed for large planned events face different health concerns, compared with concerns previously reported for animals deployed following disasters. Pre-event planning and training of handlers and riders may have helped reduce the number of health concerns, particularly health concerns related to high heat. (J Am Vet Med Assoc 2015;247:539–541)

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Chatfield (jen_chatfield@hotmail.com).

The authors thank Dee Curran, Carol Newsome, Kristi Rodas, Cindy Bender, Staff Sgt. Bethzabe Delgado Lamarche, and Caleb Jefferson for veterinary technical support during the convention; John Williams and Jeff Dalessio for critical insight and support for NVRT efforts before, during, and after the convention; and Sgt. Jerry Patrick and Cpl. Ellen Schantz for planning and support on the ground during the convention.

  • 1. Reese S. National special security events. RS22754. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2009.

  • 2. Ferton KG, Myers LJ. The scientific foundation and efficacy of the use of canines as chemical detectors for explosives. Talanta 2001; 54: 487500.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Department of Homeland Security. Explosive detection dog teams. Available at: www.dhs.gov/explosive-detection-dog-teams. Accessed Apr 20, 2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Roth M. Mounted police forces: a comparative history. Polic Int J Police Strateg Manage 1998; 21: 707719.

  • 5. Fox PR, Puschner B, Ebel JG. Assessment of acute injuries, exposure to environmental toxins, and five-year health surveillance of New York Police Department working dogs following the September 11, 2001, World Trade Center terrorist attack. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008; 233: 4859.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Gordon LE. Injuries and illnesses among urban search-and-rescue dogs deployed to Haiti following the January 12, 2010, earthquake. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 240: 396403.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Slensky KA, Drobatz KJ, Downend AB, et al. Deployment morbidity among search-and-rescue dogs used after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004; 225: 868873.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. National Climatic Data Center. Record of climatological observations. Available at: www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/quickdata. Accessed May 26, 2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. Wingfield WE, Nash SL, Palmer SB, et al. Veterinary disaster medicine: working animals. Ames, Iowa. Wiley-Blackwell 2009; 25: 71.

Advertisement