• 1. Erasmus MA, Turner PV, Widowski TM. Measures of insensibility used to determine effective stunning and killing of poultry. J Appl Poult Res 2010; 19: 288298.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. Coenen AML, Lankhaar J, Lowe JC, et al. Remote monitoring of electroencephalogram, electrocardiogram, and behavior during controlled atmosphere stunning in broilers: implications for welfare. Poult Sci 2009; 88: 1019.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. McKeegan DEF, McIntyre J, Demmers TGM, et al. Physiological and behavioural responses of broilers to controlled atmosphere stunning: implications for welfare. Anim Welf 2007; 16: 409426.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. McKeegan DEF, Smith FS, Demmers TGM, et al. Behavioural correlates of olfactory and trigeminal gaseous stimulation in chickens, Gallus domesticus. Physiol Behav 2005; 84: 761768.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. Abeyesinghe SM, McKeegan DEF, Mcleman MA, et al. Controlled atmosphere stunning of broiler chickens. I. Effects on behaviour, physiology and meat quality in a pilot scale system at a processing plant. Br Poult Sci 2007; 48: 406423.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. McKeegan DEF, McIntyre J, Demmers TGM, et al. Behavioural responses of broiler chickens during acute exposure to gaseous stimulation. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006; 99: 271286.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Raj ABM. Aversive reactions of turkeys to argon, carbon dioxide and a mixture of carbon dioxide and argon. Vet Rec 1996; 138: 592593.

  • 8. Raj M. Welfare during stunning and slaughter of poultry. Poult Sci 1998; 77: 18151819.

  • 9. Webster AB, Fletcher DL. Assessment of the aversion of hens to different gas atmospheres using an approach-avoidance test. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2004; 88: 275287.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Webster AB, Fletcher DL. Reactions of laying hens and broilers to different gases used for stunning poultry. Poult Sci 2001; 80: 13711377.

  • 11. Gerritzen MA, Lambooij E, Hillebrand SJW, et al. Behavioral responses of broilers to different gaseous atmospheres. Poult Sci 2000; 79: 928933.

  • 12. Benson ER, Alphin RL, Rankin MK et al. Evaluation of EEG based determination of unconsciousness vs loss of posture in broilers. Res Vet Sci 2012; 93: 960964.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Raj ABM, O'Callaghan M, Knowles TG. The effects of amount and frequency of alternating current used in water bath stunning and of slaughter methods on electroencephalograms in broilers. Anim Welf 2006; 15: 718.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Raj ABM, O'Callaghan, Hughes SI. The effects of amount and frequency of pulsed direct current used in water bath stunning and of slaughter methods on spontaneous electroencephalograms in broilers. Anim Welf 2006; 15: 1924.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Prinz S, Van Oijen G, Ehinger F, et al. Electroencephalograms and physical reflexes of broilers after electrical water bath stunning using an alternating current. Poult Sci 2010; 89: 12651274.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Prinz S, Van Oijen G, Ehinger F, et al. Effects of water bath stunning on the electroencephalograms and physical reflexes of broilers using a pulsed direct current. Poult Sci 2010; 89: 12751284.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Raj ABM, O'Callaghan, Hughes SI. The effects of pulse width of a direct current used in water bath stunning and of slaughter methods on spontaneous electroencephalograms in broilers. Anim Welf 2006; 15: 2530.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Kennett R. Modern electroencephalography. J Neurol 2012; 259: 783789.

  • 19. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare. Guidance on the assessment criteria for studies evaluating the effectiveness of stunning interventions regarding animal protection at the time of killing. EFSA J 2013; 11:3486.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Gregory NG, Wotton SB. Effect of electrical stunning on somatosensory evoked potentials in chickens. Br Vet J 1989; 145: 159164.

  • 21. Gregory NG, Wotton SB. Effect of stunning on spontaneous physical activity and evoked activity in the brain. Br Poult Sci 1990; 31: 215220.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Mohan Raj AB, Wotton SB, Gregory NG. Changes in the somatosensory evoked potentials and spontaneous electroencephalogram of hens during stunning with a carbon dioxide and argon mixture. Br Vet J 1992; 148: 147156.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23. Raj AB, Wotton SB, McKinstry JL, et al. Changes in the somatosensory evoked potentials and spontaneous electroencephalogram of broiler chickens during exposure to gas mixtures. Br Poult Sci 1998; 39: 686695.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24. Gerritzen MA, Lambooij B, Reimert H, et al. On-farm euthanasia of broiler chickens: effects of different gas mixtures on behaviour and brain activity. Poult Sci 2004; 83: 12941301.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25. Gerritzen MA, Lambooij B, Reimert H, et al. Susceptibility of duck and turkey to severe hypercapnic hypoxia. Poult Sci 2006; 85: 10551061.

  • 26. Raj ABM, O'Callaghan M. Effect of amount and frequency of stunning currents on the electroencephalogram and somatosensory evoked potential in broilers. Anim Welf 2004; 13: 159170.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27. Raj ABM, O'Callaghan M. Effects of electrical water bath stunning current frequencies on the spontaneous electroencephalogram and somatosensory evoked potential in hens. Br Poult Sci 2004; 45: 230236.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28. McKeegan DEF, Abeyesinghe SM, Mcleman MA, et al. Controlled atmosphere stunning of broiler chickens. II. Effects on behaviour, physiology and meat quality in a commercial processing plant. Br Poult Sci 2007; 48: 430442.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29. Gerritzen MA, Reimert HGM, Hindle VA, et al. Multistage carbon dioxide gas stunning of broilers. Poult Sci 2013; 92: 4150.

  • 30. Mohan Raj AB, Gregory NG. Effect of rate of induction of carbon dioxide anesthesia on the time of onset of unconsciousness and convulsions. Res Vet Sci 1990; 49: 360363.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31. Mohan Raj AB, Gregory NG, Wotton SB. Effect of carbon dioxide stunning on somatosensory evoked potentials in hens. Res Vet Sci 1990; 49: 355359.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32. Vizzier-Thaxton Y, Christensen KD, Schilling MW, et al. A new humane method of stunning broilers using low atmospheric pressure. J Appl Poult Res 2010; 19: 341348.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33. McKeegan DEF, Sadercock DA, Gerritzen MA. Physiological responses to low atmospheric pressure stunning and the implications for welfare. Poult Sci 2013; 92: 858868.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34. Hindle VA, Lambooij E, Reimert HGM, et al. Animal welfare concerns during the use of the water bath for stunning broilers, hens, and ducks. Poult Sci 2010; 89: 401412.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35. Sparrey JM, Ketylewell PJ, Paice MER, et al. Development of a constant current water bath stunner for poultry processing. J Agric Eng Res 1993; 56: 267274.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36. Prinz S, Van Oijen G, Ehinger F, et al. Electrical waterbath stunning: influence of different waveform and voltage settings on the induction of unconsciousness and death in male and female broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2012; 91: 9981008.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37. Kannan G, Heath JL, Wabeck CJ. Shackling of broilers: effects on stress responses and breast meat quality. Br Poult Sci 1997; 38: 323332.

  • 38. Gentle MJ, Tilston VL. Nociceptors in the legs of poultry: implications for potential pain in pre-slaughter shackling. Anim Welf 2000; 9: 227236.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39. Debut M, Berri C, Arnould C, et al. Behavioural and physiological responses of three chicken breeds to pre-slaughter shackling and acute heat stress. Br Poult Sci 2005; 46: 527535.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40. Bedanova I, Voslarova E, Chloupek P, et al. Stress in broilers resulting from shackling. Poult Sci 2007; 86: 10651069.

  • 41. Gregory NG, Bell JC. Duration of wing flapping in chickens shackled before slaughter. Vet Rec 1987; 121: 567569.

  • 42. Lines JA, Jones TA, Berry PS, et al. Evaluation of a breast support conveyor to improve poultry welfare on the shackle line. Vet Rec 2011; 168:129.

  • 43. Beyssen C, Babile R, Fernandez X. Electrocorticogram spectral analysis and somatosensory evoked potentials as tools to assess electrical stunning efficiency in ducks. Br Poult Sci 2004; 45: 409415.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44. Bilgili SF. Recent advances in electrical stunning. Poult Sci 1999; 78: 282286.

  • 45. Craig EW, Fetcher DL. A comparison of high current and low voltage electrical stunning systems on broiler breast rigor development and meat quality. Poult Sci 1997; 76: 11781181.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46. McNeal WD, Fetcher DL, Buhr RJ. Effects of stunning and decapitation on broiler activity during bleeding, blood loss, carcass, and breast meat quality. Poult Sci 2003; 82: 163168.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47. Heath GE, Thaler AM, James WO. A survey of stunning methods currently used during slaughter of poultry in commercial poultry plants. J Appl Poult Res 1994; 3: 297302.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48. Prinz S, Coenen A, Ehinger F, et al. Stunning effectiveness of broiler chickens using a two-phase stunner: pulsed direct current followed by sine wave alternating current. Arch Geflugelkd 2010; 76: 6371.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49. Shields SJ, Raj ABM. A critical review of electiical water-bath stun systems for poultry slaughter and recent developments in alternative technologies. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2010; 13: 281299.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50. AAAP/ACPV. Position statement on stunning of poultry. 2008. Available at: www.aaap.info/assets/documents/PositionControlledAtmosphereStunningOfPoultry.pdf. Accessed Mar 5, 2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement

A review of bird welfare during controlled atmosphere and electrical water-bath stunning

Cia L. JohnsonAnimal Welfare Division, AVMA, 1931 N Meacham Rd, Schaumburg, IL 60173.

Search for other papers by Cia L. Johnson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Johnson (cjohnson@avma.org).