Ultrasonographic, computed tomographic, and operative findings in dogs infested with giant kidney worms (Dioctophyme renale)

Sheila C. Rahal Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Rubião Júnior s/n, 18618970, Brazil.

Search for other papers by Sheila C. Rahal in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Maria J. Mamprim Department of Radiology and Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Rubião Júnior s/n, 18618970, Brazil.

Search for other papers by Maria J. Mamprim in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Hugo S. Oliveira Department of Radiology and Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Rubião Júnior s/n, 18618970, Brazil.

Search for other papers by Hugo S. Oliveira in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Luciane R. Mesquita Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Rubião Júnior s/n, 18618970, Brazil.

Search for other papers by Luciane R. Mesquita in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MSc
,
Luis G. Faria Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Rubião Júnior s/n, 18618970, Brazil.

Search for other papers by Luis G. Faria in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Regina K. Takahira Veterinary Clinic, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Rubião Júnior s/n, 18618970, Brazil.

Search for other papers by Regina K. Takahira in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Lídia M. Matsubara Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Rubião Júnior s/n, 18618970, Brazil.

Search for other papers by Lídia M. Matsubara in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Felipe S. Agostinho Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Rubião Júnior s/n, 18618970, Brazil.

Search for other papers by Felipe S. Agostinho in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MSc

Abstract

Objective—To compare ultrasonographic, CT, and surgical findings in dogs infested with giant kidney worms (Dioctophyme renale).

Design—Case series.

Animals—15 crossbred dogs infected with D renale.

Procedures—Immediately after ultrasonography was performed with dogs in dorsal recumbency, sequential transverse images of the abdomen were acquired with a helical CT scanner. After plain CT, contrast CT was performed with a nonionic iodinated contrast agent. Subsequently, exploratory celiotomy was performed.

Results—In the corticomedullary area of the right kidney of 12 dogs, ultrasonography revealed several ring-like structures with an echogenic wall and anechoic central area in the transverse plane and arrayed as bands in the longitudinal plane. Similar structures were observed in the abdominal cavity of 10 dogs. In 13 dogs, CT revealed loss of corticomedullary differentiation in the right kidney, with discrete uptake of contrast material in the periphery of the kidney, and several ring-like or elongated structures with a hyperdense wall and hypodense center. In 11 dogs, the same structures were observed free in the abdominal cavity. Surgery revealed that 13 dogs had a damaged right kidney that required nephrectomy. Parasites were found free in the abdominal cavity of 7 dogs.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Ultrasonography and CT were effective imaging methods for detecting D renale in the kidney and less effective for detecting parasites in the abdominal cavity. Care should be taken to avoid erroneously interpreting normal structures as parasites, especially in the abdominal cavity.

Abstract

Objective—To compare ultrasonographic, CT, and surgical findings in dogs infested with giant kidney worms (Dioctophyme renale).

Design—Case series.

Animals—15 crossbred dogs infected with D renale.

Procedures—Immediately after ultrasonography was performed with dogs in dorsal recumbency, sequential transverse images of the abdomen were acquired with a helical CT scanner. After plain CT, contrast CT was performed with a nonionic iodinated contrast agent. Subsequently, exploratory celiotomy was performed.

Results—In the corticomedullary area of the right kidney of 12 dogs, ultrasonography revealed several ring-like structures with an echogenic wall and anechoic central area in the transverse plane and arrayed as bands in the longitudinal plane. Similar structures were observed in the abdominal cavity of 10 dogs. In 13 dogs, CT revealed loss of corticomedullary differentiation in the right kidney, with discrete uptake of contrast material in the periphery of the kidney, and several ring-like or elongated structures with a hyperdense wall and hypodense center. In 11 dogs, the same structures were observed free in the abdominal cavity. Surgery revealed that 13 dogs had a damaged right kidney that required nephrectomy. Parasites were found free in the abdominal cavity of 7 dogs.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Ultrasonography and CT were effective imaging methods for detecting D renale in the kidney and less effective for detecting parasites in the abdominal cavity. Care should be taken to avoid erroneously interpreting normal structures as parasites, especially in the abdominal cavity.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Rahal was supported by a research grant provided by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Brasilia, Brazil.

Presented as a poster at the European Veterinary Diagnostic Imaging Conference, Cascais, Portugal, August 2013.

Address correspondence to Dr. Rahal (sheilacr@fmvz.unesp.br).
  • 1. Osborne CA, Stevens JB, Hanlon GF, et al. Dioctophyma renale in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1969; 155:605620.

  • 2. Kommers GD, Ilha MRS, Barros CSL. Dioctophymosis in dogs: 16 cases. Cienc Rural 1999; 29:517522.

  • 3. Pereira BJ, Girardelli GL, Trivilin LO, et al. The occurrence of dioctophymosis in dogs from Municipality of Cachoeiro do Itapemirim in the State of Espírito Santo, Brazil, from May to December of 2004. Rev Braz Parasitol Vet 2006; 15:123125.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Nakagawa TL, Bracarense A, dos Reis AC, et al. Giant kidney worm (Dioctophyma renale) infections in dogs from Northern Paraná, Brazil. Vet Parasitol 2007; 145:366370.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. Soler M, Cardoso L, Teixeira M, et al. Imaging diagnosis—Dioctophyma renale in a dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2008; 49:307308.

  • 6. Lemos LS, Santos ASO, Rodrigues ABF, et al. Extrarenal lesion caused by Dioctophyma renale eggs in an erratic cycle in a dog. Int J Morphol 2010; 28:10311034.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Ferreira VL, Medeiros FP, July JR, et al. Dioctophyma renale in a dog: clinical diagnosis and surgical treatment. Vet Parasitol 2010; 168:151155.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. Sousa AAR, Sousa AAS, Coelho MCOC, et al. Dioctophymosis in dogs. Acta Sci Vet 2011; 39:14.

  • 9. Cottar BH, Dittrich G, Ferreira AA, et al. Ultrasound findings in dogs with Dioctophyma renale—a retrospective study. Vet Zootec 2012; 19:811.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Mech LD. Spatial and temporal differences in giant kidney worm, Dictophyma renale, prevalence in Minnesota mink, Mustela vison. Can Field Nat 2008; 122:162165.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Ishizaki MN, Imbeloni AA, Muniz JAPC, et al. Dioctophyma renale (Goeze, 1782) in the abdominal cavity of a capuchin monkey (Cebus apella), Brazil. Vet Parasitol 2010; 173:340343.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Verocai GG, Measures LN, Azevedo FD, et al. Dioctophyme renale (Goeze, 1782) in the abdominal cavity of a domestic cat from Brazil. Vet Parasitol 2009; 161:342344.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Tokiwa T, Harunari T, Tanikawa T, et al. Dioctophyme renale (Nematoda: Dioctophymatoidea) in the abdominal cavity of Rattus norvegicus in Japan. Parasitol Int 2011; 60:324326.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Sardjono TW, Purnomo BB, Iskandar A, et al. Dioctophymatosis renalis in humans: first case report from Indonesia, in Proceedings. Assoc Southeast Asian Nations Cong Trop Med Parasitol 2008;9093.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Li G, Liu C, Li F, et al. Fatal bilateral dioctophymatosis. J Parasitol 2010; 96:11521154.

  • 16. Gu Y, Li G, Zhang J, et al. Dioctophyma renale infection masquerading as a malignancy. Kidney Int 2012; 82:1342.

  • 17. Liu D. Dioctophyme. In: Molecular detection of human parasitic pathogens. Boca Raton, Fla: Taylor & Francis, 2012;535538.

  • 18. Alvarenga J, Matera JM, Barros PSM, et al. Dioctophyma renale in a dog. Mod Vet Pract 1984; 65:125.

  • 19. Secchi P, Valle SF, Brun MV, et al. Videolaparoscopic nephrectomy in the treatment of canine dioctophymosis. Acta Sci Vet 2010; 38:8589.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Maia VCC, Vieira SL, Oliveira PC, et al. Dioctofimosis inguinal in dog—case report. Vet Zootec 2012; 19:8688.

  • 21. Veiga CCP, Oliveira PC, Ferreira AMR, et al. Dioctophimosis in pregnant uterus in dog—case report. Braz J Vet Med 2012; 34:188191.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Silveira LL, Lemos LS, Ferreira FS, et al. Comparative analysis among the techniques of sedimentation-centrifugal and fast sedimentation (Paratest) on identification of eggs of Dioctophyma renale in piss of dogs. J Bras Cienc Anim 2009; 2:150158.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement