• 1. Robison JD, Stott GH, DeNise SK. Effects of passive immunity on growth and survival in the dairy heifer. J Dairy Sci 1988; 71: 12831287.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. DeNise SK, Robison JD & Stott GH, et al. Effects of passive immunity on subsequent production in dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci 1989; 72: 552554.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Faber SN, Faber NE & McCauley TC, et al. Case study: effects of colostrum ingestion on lactational performance. Prof Anim Sci 2005; 1: 420425.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Davis CL, Drackley JK. The development, nutrition, and management of the young calf. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1998.

  • 5. McGuirk SM, Collins M. Managing the production, storage, and delivery of colostrum. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2004; 20: 593603.

  • 6. Godden S. Colostrum management for dairy calves. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2008; 24: 1939.

  • 7. Beam AL, Lombard JE & Kopral CA, et al. Prevalence of failure of passive transfer of immunity in newborn heifer calves and associated management practices on US dairy operations. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92: 39733980.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. Ferrer JF, Kenyon SJ, Gupta P. Milk of dairy cows frequently contains a leukemogenic virus. Science 1981; 213: 10141016.

  • 9. Pithua P, Godden SM & Wells SJ, et al. Efficacy of feeding plasma-derived commercial colostrum replacer for the prevention of transmission of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculos is in Holstein calves. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2009; 234: 11671176.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Nielsen SS, Bjerre H, Toft N. Colostrum and milk as risk factors for infection with Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2008; 91: 46104615.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Thornsberry RM, Woods D. Colostrum replacers—a review for veterinary practitioners. Bovine Pract 2011; 45: 149164.

  • 12. Swan H, Godden S & Bey R, et al. Passive transfer of immunoglobulin G and preweaning health in Holstein calves fed a commercial colostrum replacer. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90: 38573866.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Foster DM, Smith GW & Sanner TR, et al. Serum IgG and total protein concentrations in dairy calves fed two colostrum replacement products. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006; 229: 12821285.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Fidler AP, Alley ML, Smith GW. Short communication: serum immunoglobulin G and total protein concentrations in dairy calves fed a colostrum-replacement product. J Dairy Sci 2011; 94: 36093612.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Centers for Epidemiology and Animal Health, National Animal Health Monitoring System. Biosecurity practices on U.S. dairy operations, 1991–2007. Report No. 544.0510. Fort Collins, Colo: USDA APHIS Veterinary Services, 2008. Available at: www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/nahms/dairy/downloads/dairy07/Dairy07_ir_Biosecurity.pdf. Accessed Jan 17, 2013

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Chelack BJ, Morley PS, Haines DM. Evaluation of methods for dehydration of bovine colostrum for total replacement of normal colostrum in calves. Can Vet J 1993; 34: 407412.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Fleenor WA, Stott GH. Single radial immunodiffusion analysis for quantitation of colostral immunoglobulin concentration. J Dairy Sci 1981; 64: 740747.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Quigley JD III, Kost CJ, Wolfe TM. Absorption of protein and IgG in calves fed a colostrum supplement or replacer. J Dairy Sci 2002; 85: 12431248.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Greenland S, Drescher K. Maximum likelihood estimation of the attributable fraction from logistic models. Biometrics 1993; 49: 865872.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Morrill KM, Conrad E & Lago A, et al. Nationwide evaluation of quality and composition of colostrum on dairy farms in the United States. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95: 39974005.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. Weaver DM, Tyler JW & VanMetre DC, et al. Passive transfer of colostral immunoglobulins in calves. J Vet Intern Med 2000; 14: 569577.

  • 22. Devery-Pocius JE, Larson BL. Age and previous lactations as factors in the amount of bovine colostral immunoglobulins. J Dairy Sci 1983; 66: 221226.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23. Donovan GA, Dohoo IR & Montgomery DM, et al. Associations between passive immunity and morbidity and mortality in dairy heifers in Florida, USA. Prev Vet Med 1998; 34: 3146.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24. Moore M, Tyler JW & Chigerwe M, et al. Effect of delayed colostrum collection on colostral IgG concentration in dairy cows. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 226: 13751377.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25. Godden SM, Smolenski DJ & Donahue M, et al. Heat-treated colostrum and reduced morbidity in preweaned dairy calves: results of a randomized trial and examination of mechanisms of effectiveness. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95: 40294040.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26. Jones CM, James RE & Quigley JD III, et al. Influence of pooled colostrum or colostrum replacement on IgG and evaluation of animal plasma in milk replacer. J Dairy Sci 2004; 87: 18061814.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27. Quigley JD III, Fike DL & Egerton MN, et al. Effects of a colostrum replacement product derived from serum on immunoglobulin G absorption by calves. J Dairy Sci 1998; 81: 19361939.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28. Centers for Epidemiology and Animal Health, National Animal Health Monitoring System. Colostrum feeding and management on U.S. dairy operations, 1991–2007. Report No. 516.0308. Fort Collins, Colo: USDA APHIS Veterinary Services, 2008. Available at: www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/nahms/dairy/downloads/dairy07/Dairy07_is_Colostrum.pdf. Accessed Jan 10, 2013.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • 29. Godden SM, Haines DM, Hagman D. Improving passive transfer of immunoglobulins in calves. I: dose effect of feeding a commercial colostrum replacer. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92: 17501757.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30. Godden SM, Haines DM & Konkol K, et al. Improving passive transfer of immunoglobulins in calves. II: interaction between feeding method and volume of colostrum fed. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92: 17581764.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31. Haines DM, Godden SM. Short communication: improving passive transfer of immunoglobulins in calves. III. Effect of artificial mothering. J Dairy Sci 2011; 94: 15361539.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32. Calloway CD, Tyler JW & Tessman RK, et al. Comparison of refractometers and test endpoints in the measurement of serum protein concentration to assess passive transfer status in calves. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 221: 16051608.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement

Efficacy of feeding a lacteal-derived colostrum replacer or pooled maternal colostrum with a low IgG concentration for prevention of failure of passive transfer in dairy calves

Patrick PithuaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211.

Search for other papers by Patrick Pithua in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVM, PhD
,
Sharif S. AlyVeterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, 18830 Road 112, Tulare, CA 93274.

Search for other papers by Sharif S. Aly in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, MPVM, PhD
,
Deborah M. HainesDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, S7N 5A2 SK, Canada; and The Saskatoon Colostrum Co Ltd, 30 Molaro Pl, Saskatoon, S7K 6A2 SK, Canada.

Search for other papers by Deborah M. Haines in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
John D. ChampagneVeterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, 18830 Road 112, Tulare, CA 93274.

Search for other papers by John D. Champagne in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MPVM
,
John R. MiddletonDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211.

Search for other papers by John R. Middleton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD, DACVIM
, and
Scott E. PoockDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211.

Search for other papers by Scott E. Poock in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, DABVP
View More View Less

Abstract

Objective—To compare the efficacy of a lacteal-derived colostrum replacer (LDCR) for the prevention of failure of passive transfer of immunity (FPT) in calves with that of pooled maternal colostrum (MC).

Design—Randomized field trial.

Animals—568 heifer calves from 1 California dairy.

Procedures—Calves were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 treatment groups and fed 2 doses (200 g of IgG) of an LDCR or 3.8 L of pooled MC. From each calf, blood samples were collected before and approximately 24 hours after treatment. Serum IgG and total protein (TP) concentrations were quantified with standard methods, and the apparent efficiency of IgG absorption was calculated.

Results—At 24 hours after treatment, mean serum TP and IgG concentrations were significantly lower for calves fed pooled MC (TP, 4.77 g/dL; IgG, 7.50 g/L), compared with those for calves fed the LDCR (TP, 5.50 g/dL; IgG, 15.15 g/L). Calves fed the LDCR were 95% less likely to develop FPT (OR, 0.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 0.08) than were calves fed pooled MC. However, the mean IgG concentration in the pooled MC fed during the study (21.1 g/L) was substantially lower than that (64.3 g/L) determined for representative samples of pooled MC from other southwestern US dairies during a national survey.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results indicated that, on this particular dairy, calves fed an LDCR were at less risk of developing FPT than were calves fed pooled MC. The LDCR evaluated was a viable alternative for the prevention of FPT in calves.

Abstract

Objective—To compare the efficacy of a lacteal-derived colostrum replacer (LDCR) for the prevention of failure of passive transfer of immunity (FPT) in calves with that of pooled maternal colostrum (MC).

Design—Randomized field trial.

Animals—568 heifer calves from 1 California dairy.

Procedures—Calves were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 treatment groups and fed 2 doses (200 g of IgG) of an LDCR or 3.8 L of pooled MC. From each calf, blood samples were collected before and approximately 24 hours after treatment. Serum IgG and total protein (TP) concentrations were quantified with standard methods, and the apparent efficiency of IgG absorption was calculated.

Results—At 24 hours after treatment, mean serum TP and IgG concentrations were significantly lower for calves fed pooled MC (TP, 4.77 g/dL; IgG, 7.50 g/L), compared with those for calves fed the LDCR (TP, 5.50 g/dL; IgG, 15.15 g/L). Calves fed the LDCR were 95% less likely to develop FPT (OR, 0.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 0.08) than were calves fed pooled MC. However, the mean IgG concentration in the pooled MC fed during the study (21.1 g/L) was substantially lower than that (64.3 g/L) determined for representative samples of pooled MC from other southwestern US dairies during a national survey.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results indicated that, on this particular dairy, calves fed an LDCR were at less risk of developing FPT than were calves fed pooled MC. The LDCR evaluated was a viable alternative for the prevention of FPT in calves.

Contributor Notes

Supported in part by USDA-Animal Health Formula Funds administered by the Committee on Research Grants at the College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri.

Address correspondence to Dr. Pithua (pithuap@missouri.edu).