Authors
, , , , , and
Advertisement
ProCite
RefWorks
Reference Manager
BibTeX
Zotero
EndNote
-
1. Schoen JW, Miller SD. New strategies for bear conservation: collaboration between resource agencies and environmental organizations. Ursus 2002; 13:361–367.
-
2. Westley F, Vredenburg H. Interorganizational collaboration and the preservation of global biodiversity. J Org Sci 1997; 8:381–403
-
3. Fraser D. Animal welfare, values, and mandated science. In: Fraser D, ed. Understanding animal welfare: the science in its cultural context. West Sussex, England: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008; 260–274.
-
4. Mellor DJ, Bayvel ACD. New Zealand's inclusive science-based system for setting animal welfare standards. J Appl Anim Behav Sci 2008; 113:313–329.
-
5. Johnston BR. Human rights and the environment. J Hum Ecol 1995; 23:110–123.
-
6. Saunders CD, Brook AT, Myers OE Jr. Using psychology to save biodiversity and human well-being. Conserv Biol 2006; 20:702–705.
-
7. Dawkins MS. Evolution and animal welfare. Q Rev Biol 1998; 73:305–327.
-
8. Boettke PJ. Controversy: is economics a moral science? A response to Richard F Crespo. J Markets Morality 1998; 1:212–219.
-
9. Lusk JL, Norwood FB. Animal welfare economics. J Appl Econ Pers Policy 2011; 22:1–21.
-
10. Tonsor GT, Wolf CA. Drivers of resident support for animal care oriented ballot initiatives. J Agric Appl Econ 2010; 42:3.
-
11. O'Riordan T. Environmental science, sustainability, and politics. Trans Inst Br Geogr 2004; 29:234–247.
-
12. Adam S, Kriesi H. The network approach. In: Sabatier PA, ed. Theories of the policy process. Cambridge, England: Westview Press, 2007; 129–154.
-
13. Coleman WD, Skogstad GD, Atkinson MM. Paradigms shifts and policy networks: cumulative change in agriculture. J Public Policy 1996; 16:273–301.
-
14. World Health Organization Division of Mental Health and Prevention of Substance Abuse. WHOQOL: measuring quality of life. Available at: www.who.int/mental_health/media/68.pdf. Accessed Aug 28, 2012.
-
15. Power M, Bullinger M, Harper A. The World Health Organization WHOQOL-100: tests of the universality of quality of life in 15 different cultural groups worldwide. J Health Psychol 1999; 18:495–505.
-
16. Broom DM. Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. J Anim Sci 1991; 69:4167–4175.
-
17. Dennett D. On failures of freedom & the fear of science. Daedalus 2003; 132:126–130.
-
18. Larkin M. Pioneering a profession: the birth of veterinary education in the Age of Enlightenment. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2011; 238:8–11.
-
19. AVMA. Veterinarian's oath. Available at: www.avma.org/about_avma/whoweare/oath.asp. Accessed Jul 1, 2012.
-
20. National Research Council. Workforce needs in veterinary medicine. Washington, DC: National Academies of Science, 2012.
-
21. Sabatier PA, Weible CM. The advocacy coalition framework: innovations and clarifications. In: Sabatier PA, ed. Theories of the policy process. Cambridge, England: Westview Press, 2007; 189–220.
-
22. Bayvel ACD, Cross N. Animal welfare: a complex domestic and international public-policy issue—who are the key players? J Vet Med Educ 2010; 37:3–12.
-
23. Maccready P. An ambivalent luddite at a technological feast. 1999. Available at: www.designfax.net/archives/0899/899trl_2.asp. Accessed Aug 28, 2012.
Advertisement
One welfare: a call to develop a broader framework of thought and action
Tristan J. Colonius
 DVM
Tristan J. Colonius
AAAS Congressional Science and Engineering Fellows Program, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1735 1/2 Swann St NW, Washington, DC 20009.
United States Department of Agriculture, 55 Hosier St, Shelbyville, DE 19975.
Search for other papers by Tristan J. Colonius in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
United States Department of Agriculture, 55 Hosier St, Shelbyville, DE 19975.
Search for other papers by Tristan J. Colonius in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Rosemary W. Earley
 DVM
Rosemary W. Earley
AAAS Congressional Science and Engineering Fellows Program, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1735 1/2 Swann St NW, Washington, DC 20009.
United States Department of Agriculture, 55 Hosier St, Shelbyville, DE 19975.
Search for other papers by Rosemary W. Earley in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
United States Department of Agriculture, 55 Hosier St, Shelbyville, DE 19975.
Search for other papers by Rosemary W. Earley in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Contributor Notes
This commentary is the opinion of the authors and does not represent the official views of the American Association for the Advancement of Science or the United States Department of Agriculture.
ProCite
RefWorks
Reference Manager
BibTeX
Zotero
EndNote
-
1. Schoen JW, Miller SD. New strategies for bear conservation: collaboration between resource agencies and environmental organizations. Ursus 2002; 13:361–367.
-
2. Westley F, Vredenburg H. Interorganizational collaboration and the preservation of global biodiversity. J Org Sci 1997; 8:381–403
-
3. Fraser D. Animal welfare, values, and mandated science. In: Fraser D, ed. Understanding animal welfare: the science in its cultural context. West Sussex, England: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008; 260–274.
-
4. Mellor DJ, Bayvel ACD. New Zealand's inclusive science-based system for setting animal welfare standards. J Appl Anim Behav Sci 2008; 113:313–329.
-
5. Johnston BR. Human rights and the environment. J Hum Ecol 1995; 23:110–123.
-
6. Saunders CD, Brook AT, Myers OE Jr. Using psychology to save biodiversity and human well-being. Conserv Biol 2006; 20:702–705.
-
7. Dawkins MS. Evolution and animal welfare. Q Rev Biol 1998; 73:305–327.
-
8. Boettke PJ. Controversy: is economics a moral science? A response to Richard F Crespo. J Markets Morality 1998; 1:212–219.
-
9. Lusk JL, Norwood FB. Animal welfare economics. J Appl Econ Pers Policy 2011; 22:1–21.
-
10. Tonsor GT, Wolf CA. Drivers of resident support for animal care oriented ballot initiatives. J Agric Appl Econ 2010; 42:3.
-
11. O'Riordan T. Environmental science, sustainability, and politics. Trans Inst Br Geogr 2004; 29:234–247.
-
12. Adam S, Kriesi H. The network approach. In: Sabatier PA, ed. Theories of the policy process. Cambridge, England: Westview Press, 2007; 129–154.
-
13. Coleman WD, Skogstad GD, Atkinson MM. Paradigms shifts and policy networks: cumulative change in agriculture. J Public Policy 1996; 16:273–301.
-
14. World Health Organization Division of Mental Health and Prevention of Substance Abuse. WHOQOL: measuring quality of life. Available at: www.who.int/mental_health/media/68.pdf. Accessed Aug 28, 2012.
-
15. Power M, Bullinger M, Harper A. The World Health Organization WHOQOL-100: tests of the universality of quality of life in 15 different cultural groups worldwide. J Health Psychol 1999; 18:495–505.
-
16. Broom DM. Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. J Anim Sci 1991; 69:4167–4175.
-
17. Dennett D. On failures of freedom & the fear of science. Daedalus 2003; 132:126–130.
-
18. Larkin M. Pioneering a profession: the birth of veterinary education in the Age of Enlightenment. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2011; 238:8–11.
-
19. AVMA. Veterinarian's oath. Available at: www.avma.org/about_avma/whoweare/oath.asp. Accessed Jul 1, 2012.
-
20. National Research Council. Workforce needs in veterinary medicine. Washington, DC: National Academies of Science, 2012.
-
21. Sabatier PA, Weible CM. The advocacy coalition framework: innovations and clarifications. In: Sabatier PA, ed. Theories of the policy process. Cambridge, England: Westview Press, 2007; 189–220.
-
22. Bayvel ACD, Cross N. Animal welfare: a complex domestic and international public-policy issue—who are the key players? J Vet Med Educ 2010; 37:3–12.
-
23. Maccready P. An ambivalent luddite at a technological feast. 1999. Available at: www.designfax.net/archives/0899/899trl_2.asp. Accessed Aug 28, 2012.
Advertisement
Powered by PubFactory