Unilateral laryngeal paralysis subsequent to surgical ligation of a patent ductus arteriosus in an 8-week-old domestic shorthair cat

Krista N. Adamovich-Rippe Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Krista N. Adamovich-Rippe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Michele A. Steffey Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Michele A. Steffey in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, DACVS
,
Winnie L. Ybarra Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Winnie L. Ybarra in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
, and
Lynelle R. Johnson Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Lynelle R. Johnson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD, DACVIM

Abstract

Case Description—An 8-week-old female domestic shorthair cat was treated for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) with surgical ligation. Seven weeks postoperatively, the cat was evaluated because of increased upper respiratory noise, inspiratory stridor, wheezing, and episodes of intermittent open-mouth breathing that had developed 1 week following the surgical ligation.

Clinical Findings—The cat was sedated, and examination of the larynx revealed left-sided laryngeal paralysis.

Treatment and Outcome—At the time left-sided laryngeal paralysis was diagnosed, the clinical signs of laryngeal dysfunction were not considered severe enough to warrant surgical intervention. No treatment was administered, and the owner monitored the cat for respiratory distress and worsening of clinical signs for an additional 5 months. During those 5 months, the clinical signs improved but persisted. Seven months after PDA ligation, the cat was again sedated and the larynx examined. The examination revealed persistent left arytenoid dysfunction, which was believed to be the result of permanent damage to the recurrent laryngeal nerve that was sustained during the surgical ligation of the PDA. The owner was counseled about surgical and medical treatment options for laryngeal paralysis but elected to forego treatment at that time.

Clinical Relevance—Unilateral laryngeal paralysis caused by iatrogenic damage to the recurrent laryngeal nerve is a potential complication subsequent to surgical ligation of a PDA. The frequency of iatrogenically induced laryngeal paralysis is likely underestimated in small animal patients. Laryngoscopy should be performed in any small animal with a history of PDA attenuation and clinical signs of respiratory tract disease.

Abstract

Case Description—An 8-week-old female domestic shorthair cat was treated for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) with surgical ligation. Seven weeks postoperatively, the cat was evaluated because of increased upper respiratory noise, inspiratory stridor, wheezing, and episodes of intermittent open-mouth breathing that had developed 1 week following the surgical ligation.

Clinical Findings—The cat was sedated, and examination of the larynx revealed left-sided laryngeal paralysis.

Treatment and Outcome—At the time left-sided laryngeal paralysis was diagnosed, the clinical signs of laryngeal dysfunction were not considered severe enough to warrant surgical intervention. No treatment was administered, and the owner monitored the cat for respiratory distress and worsening of clinical signs for an additional 5 months. During those 5 months, the clinical signs improved but persisted. Seven months after PDA ligation, the cat was again sedated and the larynx examined. The examination revealed persistent left arytenoid dysfunction, which was believed to be the result of permanent damage to the recurrent laryngeal nerve that was sustained during the surgical ligation of the PDA. The owner was counseled about surgical and medical treatment options for laryngeal paralysis but elected to forego treatment at that time.

Clinical Relevance—Unilateral laryngeal paralysis caused by iatrogenic damage to the recurrent laryngeal nerve is a potential complication subsequent to surgical ligation of a PDA. The frequency of iatrogenically induced laryngeal paralysis is likely underestimated in small animal patients. Laryngoscopy should be performed in any small animal with a history of PDA attenuation and clinical signs of respiratory tract disease.

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Steffey (masteffey@ucdavis.edu).
  • 1. Orton EC. Cardiac surgery. In: Tobias KM, Johnston SA, eds. Veterinary surgery: small animal. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 2012; 18251826.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. Malcolm WF, Hornik C, Smith PB, et al. Vocal fold paralysis following surgical ductal closure in extremely low birth weight infants: a case series of feeding and respiratory complications. J Perinatol 2008; 28: 782785.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Pereira KD, Webb BD, Blakely ML, et al. Sequelae of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury after patent ductus arteriosus ligation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 70: 16091612.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Buchanan JW. Prevalence of cardiovascular disorders. In: Fox PR, Sisson D, Moïse NS, eds. Textbook of canine and feline cardiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1999;457.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. Detweiler DK, Patterson DF. The prevalence and types of cardiovascular disease in dogs. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1965; 127: 481516.

  • 6. Jones CL, Buchanan JW. Patent ductus arteriosus: anatomy and surgery in a cat. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1981; 179: 364369.

  • 7. Goodrich KR, Kyles AE, Kass PH, et al. Retrospective comparison of surgical ligation and transarterial catheter occlusion for treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in two hundred and four dogs (1993–2003). Vet Surg 2007; 36: 4349.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. Birchard SJ, Bonagura JD, Fingland RB. Results of ligation of patent ductus arteriosus in dogs: 201 cases (1969–1988). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1990; 196: 20112013.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. Bureau S, Monnet E, Orton EC. Evaluation of survival rate and prognostic indicators for surgical treatment of left-to-right patent ductus arteriosus in dogs: 52 cases (1995–2003). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 227: 17941799.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Hunt GB, Simpson DJ, Beck JA, et al. Intraoperative hemorrhage during patent ductus arteriosus ligation in dogs. Vet Surg 2001; 30: 5863.

  • 11. Zbar RIS, Chen AH, Behrendt DM, et al. Incidence of vocal fold paralysis in infants undergoing ligation of patent ductus arteriosus. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 61: 814816.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Clement WA, El-Hakim H, Phillipos EZ, et al. Unilateral vocal cord paralysis following patent ductus arteriosus ligation in extremely low-birth-weight infants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 134: 2833.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Eyster GE, Eyster JT, Cords GB, et al. Patent ductus arteriosus in the dog: characteristics of occurrence and results of surgery in one hundred consecutive cases. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1976; 168: 435438.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Corti LB, Merkley D, Nelson OL, et al. Retrospective evaluation of occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus with hemoclips in 20 dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2000; 36: 548555.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Mandhan PL, Samarakkody U, Brown S, et al. Comparison of suture ligation and clip applications for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm neonates. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 132: 672674.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Spanos WC, Brookes JT, Smith MC, et al. Unilateral vocal fold paralysis in premature infants after ligation of patent ductus arteriosus: vascular clip versus suture ligation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2009; 118: 750753.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Fan LL, Campbell DN, Clarke DR, et al. Paralyzed left vocal cord associated with ligation of patent ductus arteriosus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989; 98: 611613.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Hines MH, Raines KH, Payne RM, et al. Video-assisted ductal ligation in premature infants. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 14171420.

  • 19. Smith ME, King JD, Elsherif A, et al. Should all newborns who undergo patent ductus arteriosus ligation be examined for vocal fold mobility? Laryngoscope 2009; 119: 16061609.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Benjamin BN, Gray SD, Bailey CM. Neonatal vocal cord paralysis. Head Neck 1993; 15: 169172.

  • 21. Røksund OD, Clemm H, Heimdal JH, et al. Left vocal cord paralysis after extreme preterm birth, a new clinical scenario in adults. Pediatrics 2010; 126: e1569e1577.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Benjamin JR, Smith PB, Cotton CM, et al. Long-term morbidities associated with vocal cord paralysis after surgical closure of a patent ductus arteriosus in extremely low birth weight infants. J Perinatol 2010; 30: 408413.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23. Liang CD, Ko SF, Huang SC, et al. Vocal cord paralysis after transcatheter coil embolization of patent ductus arteriosus. Am Heart J 2003; 146: 367371.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24. Schachter S, Norris CR. Laryngeal paralysis in cats: 16 cases (1990–1999). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000; 216: 11001103.

  • 25. Taylor SS, Harvey AM, Barr FJ, et al. Laryngeal disease in cats: a retrospective study of 35 cases. J Feline Med Surg 2009; 11: 954962.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement