• 1.

    Rose RJ, Hodgson DR. Hindlimb abnormalities. In: Rose RJ, Hodgson DR, eds. Manual of equine practice. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1993;112.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Bohannon TC. Pain associated with the distal tarsal joints of the hock. In: Robinson NE, ed. Current therapy in equine medicine. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1997;8893.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Schamhardt HC, Hartman W, Lammertink JL. Forces loading the tarsal joint in the hind limb of the horse, determined from in vivo strain measurements of the third metatarsal bone. Am J Vet Res 1989; 50:728733.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Shelley J, Dyson S. Interpreting radiographs 5: radiology of the equine hock. Equine Vet J 1984; 16:488495.

  • 5.

    Sullins KE. The tarsus. In: Stashak TS, ed. Adams' lameness in horses. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Wiley-Blackwell, 2002;930945.

  • 6.

    Vanderperren K, Raes E, Van Bree H, et al. Diagnostic imaging of the equine tarsal region using radiography and ultrasonography. Part 2: bony disorders. Vet J 2009; 179:188196.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Murray RC, Dyson SJ, Weekes J, et al. Nuclear scintigraphic evaluation of the distal tarsal region in normal horses. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2004; 45:345351.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Murray RC, Dyson SJ, Weekes JS, et al. Nuclear scintigraphic evaluation of the distal tarsal region in horses with distal tarsal pain. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005; 46:171178.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Latorre R, Rodriguez MJ. In search of clinical truths: equine and comparative studies of anatomy. Equine Vet J 2007; 39:263268.

  • 10.

    Latorre R, Arencibia A, Gil F, et al. Correlation of magnetic resonance images with anatomic features of the equine tarsus. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67:756761.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Blaik MA, Hanson Reid R, Kincaid SA, et al. Low field magnetic resonance imaging of the equine tarsus: normal anatomy. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2000; 41:131141.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Branch MV, Murray RC, Dyson SJ, et al. Alteration of distal tarsal subchondral bone thickness pattern in horses with tarsal pain. Equine Vet J 2007; 39:101105.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Branch MV, Murray RC, Dyson SJ, et al. Is there a characteristic distal tarsal subchondral bone plate thickness pattern in horses with no history of hindlimb lameness. Equine Vet J 2005; 37:450455.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Weekes J, Dyson SJ. Image acquisition, post processing, display and storage. In: Dyson SJ, Pilsworth RC, Twardock AR, et al, eds. Equine scintigraphy. Newmarket, Suffolk, England: Equine Veterinary Journal Ltd, 2003;5368.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Dyson SJ, Martinelli MJ. Image description and interpretation in musculoskeletal scintigraphy. In: Dyson SJ, Pilsworth RC, Twardock AR, et al, eds. Equine scintigraphy. Newmarket, Suffolk, England: Equine Veterinary Journal Ltd, 2003;8796.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Swanson TD. Guide for veterinary service and judging of equestrian events. 3rd ed. Golden, Colo: American Association of Equine Practitioners, 1984.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Winegardner KR, Scrivani PV, Krotscheck U, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of subarticular bone marrow lesions in dogs with stifle lameness. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2007; 48:312317.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Lazarus ML, Rao VA. Bone marrow. In: Edelman RR, Hesselink JR, Zlatkin MB, et al, eds. Clinical magnetic resonance imaging. Vol 3. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier, 2006;35453570.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Zanetti M, Bruder E, Romero J, et al. Bone marrow edema pattern in osteoarthritic knees: correlation between MR imaging and histologic findings. Radiology 2000; 215:835840.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Beltran J. Ankle and foot. In: Edelman RR, Hesselink JR, Zlatkin MB, et al, eds. Clinical magnetic resonance imaging. Vol 3. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier, 2006;34363456.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Newberg AH, Wetzner SM. Bone bruises: their patterns and significance. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1994; 15:396409.

  • 22.

    García-López JM, Kirker-Head CA. Occult osteochondral cyst like lesions of the equine tarsocrural joint. Vet Surg 2004; 33:557564.

  • 23.

    Tapprest J, Audigie F, Radier C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of stress fractures in a horse. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2003; 44:438442.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Butler JA, Colles CM, Dyson SJ, et al. Clinical radiology of the horse. 2nd ed. Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific, 2000;158159.

Advertisement

Comparison of radiography, nuclear scintigraphy, and magnetic resonance imaging for detection of specific conditions of the distal tarsal bones of horses: 20 cases (2006–2010)

Alexander J. DanielVeterinary Teaching Hospital, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80526.

Search for other papers by Alexander J. Daniel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVetMed
,
Carter E. JudyAlamo Pintado Equine Medical Center, 2501 Santa Barbara Ave, Los Olivos, CA 93441.

Search for other papers by Carter E. Judy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, DACVS
,
Mark C. RickAlamo Pintado Equine Medical Center, 2501 Santa Barbara Ave, Los Olivos, CA 93441.

Search for other papers by Mark C. Rick in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Travis C. SaveraidVetRadiologist, 1776 Wellesley Ave, Saint Paul, MN 55105.

Search for other papers by Travis C. Saveraid in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, DACVR
, and
Douglas J. HerthelAlamo Pintado Equine Medical Center, 2501 Santa Barbara Ave, Los Olivos, CA 93441.

Search for other papers by Douglas J. Herthel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
View More View Less

Abstract

Objective—To describe pathological findings identified with MRI in the distal tarsal bones of horses with unilateral hind limb lameness attributable to tarsal pain and to compare the usefulness of MRI with that of radiography and nuclear scintigraphy in evaluation of this region.

Design—Retrospective case series.

Animals—20 lame horses.

Procedures—In all horses, MRI, radiography (4 standard projections), and nuclear scintigraphy of the tarsus had been performed. Horses were excluded if the results of all 3 imaging modalities were not available or if lameness was detected in more than 1 limb. Pathological changes identified with MRI were cross-referenced with the findings determined with other imaging modalities.

Results—Compared with MRI findings, the following lesions were identified with radiography: medullary and subchondral bone sclerosis in 9 of 16 horses, pathological changes related to osseous hyperintensity in 0 of 10 horses, and osteoarthritis in 5 of 8 horses. Standard radiographic projections did not aid in the identification of fracture of the distal tarsal bones (3 horses). Location of increased radiopharmaceutical uptake with nuclear scintigraphy corresponded with the location of pathological changes detected with MRI in all horses. The intensity of the radiopharmaceutical uptake on nuclear scintigraphic images did not correspond with the severity of the pathological changes identified with MRI.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Radiography was unreliable for the detection of pathological changes related to osseous hyperintensity identified with MRI, fracture, and subchondral bone sclerosis in the equine tarsus. Nuclear scintigraphy was effective in localizing pathological changes, but MRI provided superior anatomic detail.

Abstract

Objective—To describe pathological findings identified with MRI in the distal tarsal bones of horses with unilateral hind limb lameness attributable to tarsal pain and to compare the usefulness of MRI with that of radiography and nuclear scintigraphy in evaluation of this region.

Design—Retrospective case series.

Animals—20 lame horses.

Procedures—In all horses, MRI, radiography (4 standard projections), and nuclear scintigraphy of the tarsus had been performed. Horses were excluded if the results of all 3 imaging modalities were not available or if lameness was detected in more than 1 limb. Pathological changes identified with MRI were cross-referenced with the findings determined with other imaging modalities.

Results—Compared with MRI findings, the following lesions were identified with radiography: medullary and subchondral bone sclerosis in 9 of 16 horses, pathological changes related to osseous hyperintensity in 0 of 10 horses, and osteoarthritis in 5 of 8 horses. Standard radiographic projections did not aid in the identification of fracture of the distal tarsal bones (3 horses). Location of increased radiopharmaceutical uptake with nuclear scintigraphy corresponded with the location of pathological changes detected with MRI in all horses. The intensity of the radiopharmaceutical uptake on nuclear scintigraphic images did not correspond with the severity of the pathological changes identified with MRI.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Radiography was unreliable for the detection of pathological changes related to osseous hyperintensity identified with MRI, fracture, and subchondral bone sclerosis in the equine tarsus. Nuclear scintigraphy was effective in localizing pathological changes, but MRI provided superior anatomic detail.

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Daniel (adanielvet@gmail.com).