Clinical and histologic effects of intracardiac administration of propofol for induction of anesthesia in ball pythons (Python regius)

Michael S. McFadden Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61802.

Search for other papers by Michael S. McFadden in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS, DVM, DACVS
,
R. Avery Bennett Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61802.

Search for other papers by R. Avery Bennett in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS, DACVS
,
Drury R. Reavill Zoo/Exotic Pathology Service, 2825 KOVR Dr, West Sacramento, CA 95605.

Search for other papers by Drury R. Reavill in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, DABVP, DACVP
,
Guillaume R. Ragetly Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61802.

Search for other papers by Guillaume R. Ragetly in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD, DACVS
, and
Stuart C. Clark-Price Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61802.

Search for other papers by Stuart C. Clark-Price in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS, DACVIM, DACVA

Abstract

Objective—To assess the clinical differences between induction of anesthesia in ball pythons with intracardiac administration of propofol and induction with isoflurane in oxygen and to assess the histologic findings over time in hearts following intracardiac administration of propofol.

Design—Prospective randomized study.

Animals—30 hatchling ball pythons (Python regius).

Procedures—Anesthesia was induced with intracardiac administration of propofol (10 mg/kg [4.5 mg/lb]) in 18 ball pythons and with 5% isoflurane in oxygen in 12 ball pythons. Induction time, time of anesthesia, and recovery time were recorded. Hearts from snakes receiving intracardiac administration of propofol were evaluated histologically 3, 7, 14, 30, and 60 days following propofol administration.

Results—Induction time with intracardiac administration of propofol was significantly shorter than induction time with 5% isoflurane in oxygen. No significant differences were found in total anesthesia time. Recovery following intracardiac administration of propofol was significantly longer than recovery following induction of anesthesia with isoflurane in oxygen. Heart tissue evaluated histologically at 3, 7, and 14 days following intracardiac administration of propofol had mild inflammatory changes, and no histopathologic lesions were seen 30 and 60 days following propofol administration.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Intracardiac injection of propofol in snakes is safe and provides a rapid induction of anesthesia but leads to prolonged recovery, compared with that following induction with isoflurane. Histopathologic lesions in heart tissues following intracardiac injection of propofol were mild and resolved after 14 days.

Abstract

Objective—To assess the clinical differences between induction of anesthesia in ball pythons with intracardiac administration of propofol and induction with isoflurane in oxygen and to assess the histologic findings over time in hearts following intracardiac administration of propofol.

Design—Prospective randomized study.

Animals—30 hatchling ball pythons (Python regius).

Procedures—Anesthesia was induced with intracardiac administration of propofol (10 mg/kg [4.5 mg/lb]) in 18 ball pythons and with 5% isoflurane in oxygen in 12 ball pythons. Induction time, time of anesthesia, and recovery time were recorded. Hearts from snakes receiving intracardiac administration of propofol were evaluated histologically 3, 7, 14, 30, and 60 days following propofol administration.

Results—Induction time with intracardiac administration of propofol was significantly shorter than induction time with 5% isoflurane in oxygen. No significant differences were found in total anesthesia time. Recovery following intracardiac administration of propofol was significantly longer than recovery following induction of anesthesia with isoflurane in oxygen. Heart tissue evaluated histologically at 3, 7, and 14 days following intracardiac administration of propofol had mild inflammatory changes, and no histopathologic lesions were seen 30 and 60 days following propofol administration.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Intracardiac injection of propofol in snakes is safe and provides a rapid induction of anesthesia but leads to prolonged recovery, compared with that following induction with isoflurane. Histopathologic lesions in heart tissues following intracardiac injection of propofol were mild and resolved after 14 days.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Bennett's present address is the Animal Medical Center, 510 E 62nd St, New York, NY 10065.

Address correspondence to Dr. McFadden (mikemdvm@illinois.edu).
  • 1.

    Mitchell MA. History of exotic pets. In: Mitchell MA, Tully TN, eds. Manual of exotic pet practice. St Louis: Saunders, 2009, 13.

  • 2.

    Bennett RA. Reptile anesthesia. Semin Avian Exot Pet Med 1998; 7: 3040.

  • 3.

    Mosley CAE. Anesthesia and analgesia in reptiles. Semin Avian Exotic Pet Med 2005; 14: 243264.

  • 4.

    Schumacher J, Yelen T. Anesthesia and analgesia. in: Mader DR, ed. Reptile medicine and surgery. 2nd ed. St Louis, Saunders, 2006, 442451.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Bennett RA. Anesthesia. In: Mader DR, ed. Reptile medicine and surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1996, 241247.

  • 6.

    Bennett RA, Schumacher J, Hedjazi-Haring K, et al. Cardio-pulmonary and anesthetic effects of propofol administered intraosseously to green iguanas. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998; 212: 9398.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Anderson NL, Wack RF, Calloway L, et al. Cardiopulmonary effects and efficacy of propofol as an anesthetic agent in brown tree snakes, Boiga irregularis. Bull Assoc Reptile Amphib Vet 1999; 9: 915.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Guenette SA, Beaudry F, Vachon P. Anesthetic properties of propofol in African clawed frogs (Xenopus laevis). J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 2008; 47: 3538.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    MacLean RA, Harms CA, Braun-McNeill J. Propofol anesthesia in loggerhead (Caretta caretta) sea turtles. J Wildl Dis 2008; 44: 143150.

  • 10.

    Read MR. Evaluation of the use of anesthesia and analgesia in reptiles. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004; 224: 547552.

  • 11.

    Von Esse FV, Wright KM. Effects of intracoelomic propofol in White's tree frogs, Pelogryas caerulea. Bull Assoc Reptile Amphib Vet 1999; 9: 78.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Ziolo MS, Bertelson MF. Effects of propofol administered via the supravertebral sinus in red-eared sliders. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2009; 234: 390393.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Fonda D. Intraosseous anesthesia with propofol in red eared sliders(Trachemys scripta elegans). J Vet Anaesth 1999; 26: 4647.

  • 14.

    Alves HC, Valentim AM, Olsson IAS, et al. Intraperitoneal propofol and propofol fentanyl sufentanil and remifentanil combinations for mouse anaesthesia. Lab Anim Sci 2007; 41: 329336.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    McKune CM, Bronsnan RJ, Dark MJ, et al. Safety and efficacy of intramuscular propofol administration in rats. Vet Anaesth Analg 2008; 35: 495500.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Mitchell M. Snakes. in: Mitchell M, Tully T, eds. Manual of exotic pet practice. St Louis: Saunders, 2009, 160162.

  • 17.

    Milne VE, Hoover JP, Snider TA, et al. Intracoelomic administration of propofol in hatchling green iguanas, Iguana iguana. J Herpetol Med Surg 2006; 16: 2025.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Maxwell G. More complete chondro. Rodeo, NM: Eco Herpetological Publishing and Distribution, 2005.

  • 19.

    Isaza R, Andrews GA, Coke R, et al. Assessment of multiple cardiocentesis in ball pythons (Python regius). Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci 2004; 43: 3538.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Heard DJ, Stetter MD. Reptiles, amphibians, and fish. In: Tranquilli WJ, Thurmon JC, Grimm KA, eds. Veterinary anesthesia and analgesia. 4th ed. Ames, Iowa, Blackwell, 2007, 869887.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Steffey EP, Mama KR. Inhalation anesthetics. In: Tranquilli W, Thurmon J, Grimm K, eds. Veterinary anesthesia and analgesia. 4th ed. Ames, Iowa, Blackwell, 2007, 355393.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Hernandez-Divers SM, Schumacher J, Stahl S, et al. Comparison of isoflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia after premedication with butorphanol in the green iguana (Iguana iguana). J Zoo Wildl Med 2005; 36: 169175.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Branson KR. Injectable and alternative anesthetic techniques. In: Tranquilli WJ, Thurmon JC, Grimm KA, eds. Veterinary anesthesia and analgesia. 4th ed. Ames, Iowa, Blackwell, 2007, 273299.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Diethelm G. Reptiles. in: Carpenter JW, ed. Exotic animal formulary. 3rd ed. St Louis, Saunders, 2005, 7383.

  • 25.

    Longley L. Reptile anesthesia. in: Welch L, ed. Anaesthesia of exotic pets. Edinburgh: Saunders, 2008, 185241.

  • 26.

    Plumb DC. Propofol. In: Plumb's veterinary drug handbook. 6th ed. Ames, Iowa, Wiley-Blackwell, 2008, 10451048.

Advertisement