• 1.

    Kuusela E, Raekallio M, and Anttila M, et al. Clinical effects and pharmacokinetics of medetomidine and its enantiomers in dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2000; 23:1520.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Reves JG, Glass PS, and Lubarsky DA, et al. Intravenous nonopioid anesthetics. In: Miller RD, ed. Miller's anesthesia. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill-Livingstone, 2005;317378.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Bloor BC, Frankland M, and Alper G, et al. Hemodynamic and sedative effects of dexmedetomidine in dog. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1992; 263:690697.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Lemke KA, Tranquilli WJ, and Thurmon JC, et al. Hemodynamic effects of atropine and glycopyrrolate in isoflurane-xylazine-anesthetized dogs. Vet Surg 1993; 22:163169.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Kokkonen UM, and Eriksson L. Cardiovascular and allied actions of xylazine and atropine in the unanaesthetized goat. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1987; 10:1116.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Alitalo I, Vainio O, and Kaartinen L, et al. Cardiac effects of atropine premedication in horses sedated with detomidine. Acta Vet Scand Suppl 1986;(82):131–136.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Dunkle N, Moise NS, and Scarlett-Kranz J, et al. Cardiac performance in cats after administration of xylazine or xylazine and glycopyrrolate: echocardiographic evaluations. Am J Vet Res 1986; 47:22122216.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Alvaides RK, Neto FJ, and Aguiar AJ, et al. Sedative and cardiorespiratory effects of acepromazine or atropine given before dexmedetomidine in dogs. Vet Rec 2008; 162:852856.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Short CE. Effects of anticholinergic treatment on the cardiac and respiratory systems in dogs sedated with medetomidine. Vet Rec 1991; 129:310313.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Singh S, Young SS, and McDonell WN, et al. Modification of cardiopulmonary and intestinal motility effects of xylazine with glycopyrrolate in horses. Can J Vet Res 1997; 61:99107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Willegers HM, Prinzen FW, and Roekaerts PM. Comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine and esmolol on myocardial oxygen consumption in dogs. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004; 21:957966.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Pypendop BH, and Verstegen JP. Hemodynamic effects of medetomidine in the dog: a dose-titration study. Vet Surg 1998; 27:612622.

  • 13.

    Pagel PS, Kampine JP, and Schmeling WT, et al. Comparison of the systemic and coronary hemodynamic actions of desflurane, isoflurane, halothane, and enflurane in the chronically instrumented dog. Anesthesiology 1991; 74:539551.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Muir W, Lerche P, and Wiese A, et al. Cardiorespiratory and anesthetic effects of clinical and supraclinical doses of alfaxalone in dogs. Vet Anesth Analg 2008; 35:451462.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Chen HC, Sinclair MD, and Dyson DH, et al. Comparison of arterial pressure waveform analysis with the lithium dilution technique to monitor cardiac output in anesthetized dogs. Am J Vet Res 2005; 66:14301436.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Chen HC, Sinclair MD, and Dyson DH. Use of ephedrine and dopamine in dogs for the management of hypotension in routine clinical cases under isoflurane anesthesia. Vet Anaesth Analg 2005; 34:301311.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Miyake Y, Wagner AE, and Hellyer PW. Evaluation of hemodynamic measurements, including lithium dilution cardiac output, in anesthetized dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 227:14191423.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Boscan PB, Pypendop BH, and Siao KT, et al. Fluid balance, glomerular filtration rate, and urine output in dogs anesthetized for an orthopedic surgical procedure. Am J Vet Res 2010; 71:501507.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Wagner AE, and Miyake Y. Cardiac output and other hemodynamic variables in anesthetized dogs undergoing laparotomy because of abdominal neoplasia. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008; 232:547552.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Ko JC, Fox SM, and Mandsager RE. Effects of preemptive atropine administration on incidence of medetomidine-induced bradycardia in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001; 218:5258.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Lawrence CJ, Prinzen FW, and de Lange S. The effect of dexmedtomidine on the balance of myocardial energy requirement and oxygen supply and demand. Anesth Analg 1996; 82:544550.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Lawrence CJ, Prinzen FW, and de Lange S. Hemodynamic and coronary vascular effects of dexmedetomidine in the anesthetized goat. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997; 41:830836.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Alibhai HI, Clarke KW, and Lee YH, et al. Cardiopulmonary effects of combinations of medetomidine hydrochloride and atropine sulphate in dogs. Vet Rec 1996; 138:1113.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Nathan HJ. Coronary physiology. In: Kaplan JA, ed. Cardiac anesthesia. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 2003;254255.

  • 25.

    Pepper MG, and Crawley BC. Rate pressure product. Anaesthesia 1984; 39:192193.

  • 26.

    White WB. Heart rate and rate pressure product as determinants of cardiovascular risk in patients with hypertension. Am J Hypertension 1999; 2:50S55S.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Gross ME, and Tranquilli WJ. Use of α-2 adrenergic receptor agonists. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989; 195:378381.

  • 28.

    Kersten J, Pagel PS, and Tessmer JP, et al. Dexmedetomidine alters the hemodynamic effects of desflurane and isoflurane in chronically instrumented dogs. Anesthesiology 1993; 79:10221032.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Mason DJ, O'Grady M, and Wood JP, et al. Assessment of lithium dilution cardiac output as a technique for measurement of cardiac output in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62:12551261.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Mason DJ, O'Grady M, and Woods JP, et al. Comparison of a central and a peripheral (cephalic vein) injection site for the measurement of cardiac output using the lithium-dilution cardiac output technique in anesthetized dogs. Can J Vet Res 2002; 66:207210.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Mason DJ, O'Grady M, and Woods JP, et al. Effect of background serum lithium concentrations on the accuracy of lithium dilution cardiac output determination in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2002; 63:10481052.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Scheinin H, Karhuvaara S, and Olkkola KT, et al. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of intramuscular dexmedetomidine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992; 52:537546.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Anttila M, Penttila J, and Helminen A, et al. Bioavailability of dexmedetomidine after extravascular doses in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2003; 56:691693.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Kanto J, Virtanen R, and Iisalo E, et al. Placental transfer and pharmacokinetics of atropine after a single maternal intravenous and intramuscular administration. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1981; 25:8588.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Bloor BC, Frankland M, and Alper G, et al. Hemodynamic and sedative effects of dexmedetomidine in a dog. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1992; 263:690697.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement

Evaluation of the sedative and cardiovascular effects of intramuscular administration of dexmedetomidine with and without concurrent atropine administration in dogs

Jonathan M. CongdonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biological Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Search for other papers by Jonathan M. Congdon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS, DVM
,
Megan MarquezDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biological Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Search for other papers by Megan Marquez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BS
,
Sirirat NiyomDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biological Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Search for other papers by Sirirat Niyom in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
, and
Pedro BoscanDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biological Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Search for other papers by Pedro Boscan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD, DACVA
View More View Less

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate degree of sedation and cardiovascular, respiratory, acid-base excess, and electrolyte variables in response to IM administration of dexmedetomidine or dexmedetomidine with atropine.

Design—Randomized crossover study.

Animals—5 healthy 1- to 2-year-old sexually intact male Treeing Walker Coonhounds.

Procedures—Dogs were instrumented with catheters placed in the dorsal pedal artery and lateral saphenous vein. All dogs received dexmedetomidine (10 μg/kg [4.5 μg/lb], IM) or dexmedetomidine with atropine (0.02 mg/kg [0.009 mg/lb], IM). Variables were measured at baseline (time 0) and 5, 15, 30, and 60 minutes after drug administration.

Results—In all dogs, lithium dilution cardiac output decreased from a mean ± SD baseline value of 5.07 ± 1.0 L/min to 2.1 ± 0.9 L/min. Cardiac output was not different between dexmedetomidine group dogs and dexmedetomidine-atropine group dogs. Mean arterial pressure increased from baseline in both groups but was significantly higher in dexmedetomidine-atropine group dogs, compared with dexmedetomidine group dogs. Heart rate in dexmedetomidine group dogs decreased from 110 ± 14.2 beats/min to 49.4 ± 10.4 beats/min by 15 minutes. No differences were seen in blood gas values, electrolyte concentration, or hemoglobin values over time or between groups. Arrhythmias were detected in dexmedetomidine-atropine group dogs and included atrioventricular block, ventricular premature contractions, and ventricular bigeminy.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Administration of atropine at 0.02 mg/kg, IM, with dexmedetomidine at 10 μg/kg, IM, resulted in an increase in mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate; deleterious cardiac arrhythmias were also observed. Use of atropine with dexmedetomidine is not recommended in dogs.

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate degree of sedation and cardiovascular, respiratory, acid-base excess, and electrolyte variables in response to IM administration of dexmedetomidine or dexmedetomidine with atropine.

Design—Randomized crossover study.

Animals—5 healthy 1- to 2-year-old sexually intact male Treeing Walker Coonhounds.

Procedures—Dogs were instrumented with catheters placed in the dorsal pedal artery and lateral saphenous vein. All dogs received dexmedetomidine (10 μg/kg [4.5 μg/lb], IM) or dexmedetomidine with atropine (0.02 mg/kg [0.009 mg/lb], IM). Variables were measured at baseline (time 0) and 5, 15, 30, and 60 minutes after drug administration.

Results—In all dogs, lithium dilution cardiac output decreased from a mean ± SD baseline value of 5.07 ± 1.0 L/min to 2.1 ± 0.9 L/min. Cardiac output was not different between dexmedetomidine group dogs and dexmedetomidine-atropine group dogs. Mean arterial pressure increased from baseline in both groups but was significantly higher in dexmedetomidine-atropine group dogs, compared with dexmedetomidine group dogs. Heart rate in dexmedetomidine group dogs decreased from 110 ± 14.2 beats/min to 49.4 ± 10.4 beats/min by 15 minutes. No differences were seen in blood gas values, electrolyte concentration, or hemoglobin values over time or between groups. Arrhythmias were detected in dexmedetomidine-atropine group dogs and included atrioventricular block, ventricular premature contractions, and ventricular bigeminy.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Administration of atropine at 0.02 mg/kg, IM, with dexmedetomidine at 10 μg/kg, IM, resulted in an increase in mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate; deleterious cardiac arrhythmias were also observed. Use of atropine with dexmedetomidine is not recommended in dogs.

Contributor Notes

Presented at the 2009 American College of Veterinary Anesthesiologists Annual Meeting in conjunction with the 15th International Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Symposium, Chicago, September 2009.

The authors thank Drs. Sangeeta Rao and Francisco Olea-Popelka for their assistance in statistical analysis.

Address correspondence to Dr. Congdon (jcongdon@colostate.edu).