Analgesic drug administration and attitudes about analgesia in cattle among bovine practitioners in the United States

Virginia R. Fajt Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843.

Search for other papers by Virginia R. Fajt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD, DACVCP
,
Sarah A. Wagner Department of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108.

Search for other papers by Sarah A. Wagner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD, DACVCP
, and
Bo Norby Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843.

Search for other papers by Bo Norby in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 CMV, MPVM, PhD
Restricted access
Purchase Article

Abstract

Objective—To determine current attitudes and practices related to pain and analgesia in cattle among US veterinarians in bovine practice and to identify factors associated with these attitudes and practices.

Design—Web-based survey.

Sample—3,019 US members of the American Association of Bovine Practitioners (AABP) with e-mail addresses.

Procedures—Veterinarians were invited via e-mail to participate in a Web-based survey. Respondents replied to questions related to pain and analgesia and supplied personal, professional, and demographic information. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed, and associations among various factors were examined.

Results—666 surveys (25.5% response rate) were analyzed. Among common procedures and medical conditions of cattle listed on the survey, castration of dairy calves < 6 months old was subjectively estimated as causing the least pain; abdominal surgery, toxic mastitis, and dehorning of calves > 6 months old were assessed as causing the greatest pain. Respondents reported not providing analgesic drugs to approximately 70% of calves castrated at < 6 months of age. The most commonly administered analgesics were NSAIDs, local anesthetics, and α2-adrenergic receptor agonists. Significant associations were detected among respondent characteristics and pain ratings, percentages of cattle treated, and opinions regarding analgesia.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results provide information on current attitudes and practices related to pain and analgesia in cattle among US veterinarians in bovine practice and can be considered in the development of policies and protocols for pain management in cattle. These data can be compared with those of future studies to examine changes over time.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 382 0 0
Full Text Views 3291 1881 147
PDF Downloads 614 228 25
Advertisement