• 1.

    Hedlund CS. Surgery of the reproductive and genital systems. In: Fossum TW, eds. Small animal surgery. 3rd ed. St Louis: Mosby Elsevier, 2007;702, 710712.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Stone EA. Ovary and uterus. In: Slatter D, eds. Textbook of small animal surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2003;1495.

  • 3.

    Seager SWJ. Reproductive laparoscopy. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1990; 20:13691375.

  • 4.

    Gower SMayhew P. Canine laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted ovariohysterectomy and ovariectomy. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 2008; 30:430440.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Hancock RBLanz OIWaldron DR, et al. Comparison of postoperative pain after ovariohysterectomy by harmonic scalpel-assisted laparoscopy compared with median celiotomy and ligation in dogs. Vet Surg 2005; 34:273282.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Devitt CMCox REHailey JJ. Duration, complications, stress, and pain of open ovariohysterectomy versus a simple method of laparoscopic-assisted ovariohysterectomy in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 227:921927.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Remedios AMFergusen J. Minimally invasive surgery: laparoscopy and thoracoscopy in small animals. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1996; 18:5157.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Berzon JL. Complications of elective ovariohysterectomies in the dog and the cat at a teaching institution: clinical review of 853 cases. Vet Surg 1979; 8:8991.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Spackman CJACaywood DDJohnston GR, et al. Granulomas of the uterine and ovarian stump: a case report. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1973; 20:449453.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Dorn ASSwist RA. Complications of canine ovariohysterectomy. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1977; 13:720724.

  • 11.

    Pearson H. The complications of ovariohysterectomy in the bitch. J Small Anim Pract 1973; 14:257266.

  • 12.

    Pollari FLBonnett BN. Evaluation of postoperative complications following elective surgeries of dogs and cats at private practices using computer records. Can Vet J 1996; 37:672678.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Okkens ACKooistra HSNickel RF. Comparison of long-term effects of ovariectomy versus ovariohysterectomy in bitches. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1997;(51):227–231.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Van Goethem BSchaefers-Okkens AKirpensteijn J. Making a rational choice between ovariectomy and ovariohysterectomy in the dog: a discussion of the benefits of either technique. Vet Surg 2006; 35:136143.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Laflamme DP. Body condition scoring and weight maintenance. In Proceedings. North Am Vet Conf 1993; 16–21, 290291.

  • 16.

    Laflamme DPKuhlman GLawler DF, et al. Obesity management in dogs. J Vet Clin Nutr 1994; 1:5965.

  • 17.

    Morton CMReid JScott EM, et al. Application of a scaling model to establish and validate an interval level pain scale for assessment of acute pain in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2005; 66:21542166.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Reid JNolan AMHughes JML, et al. Development of the short-form Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale (CMPS-SF) and derivation of an analgesic intervention score. Animal Welfare 2007; 16(suppl):97104.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Holton LReid JScott E, et al. Development of a behaviour-based scale to measure acute pain in dogs. Vet Rec 2001; 148:525531.

  • 20.

    Lee MHIngvertsens BTKirpensteijn J, et al. Quantification of surgical blood loss. Vet Surg 2006; 35:388393.

  • 21.

    Giger U. Regenerative anemias caused by blood loss or hemolysis. In: Ettinger SJFeldman EC, eds. Textbook of veterinary internal medicine. 6th ed. St Louis: Elsevier Inc, 2005;1888.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Burrow RBatchelor DCripps P. Complications observed during and after ovariohysterectomy of 142 bitches at a veterinary teaching hospital. Vet Rec 2005; 157:829833.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Johar RSSmith RP. Assessing gravimetric estimation of intraoperative blood loss. J Gynecol Surg 1993; 9:151154.

  • 24.

    Anil SSAnil LDeen J. Challenges of pain assessment in domestic animals. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 220:313319.

  • 25.

    Williams ACDDavies HTChadbury Y. Simple pain rating scales hide complex idiosyncratic meanings. Pain 2000; 85:457463.

  • 26.

    Mathew PJMathew JL. Assessment and management of pain in infants. Postgrad Med J 2003; 79:438443.

  • 27.

    Holton LLScott EMNolan AM, et al. Comparison of three methods used for assessment of pain in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998; 212:6166.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Lascelles BDCripps PJJones A, et al. Post-operative central hypersensitivity and pain: the pre-emptive value of pethidine for ovariohysterectomy. Pain 1997; 73:461471.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Firth AMHaldane SL. Development of a scale to evaluate postoperative pain in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999; 214:651659.

  • 30.

    Slingsby LSWaterman-Pearson AE. The postoperative analgesic effects of ketamine after canine ovariohysterectomy—a comparison between pre- or post-operative administration. Res Vet Sci 2000; 69:147152.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Lemke KARunyon CLHorney BS. Effects of preoperative administration of ketoprofen on anesthetic requirements and signs of postoperative pain in dogs undergoing elective ovariohysterectomy. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002; 221:12681275.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Murrell JCPsatha EPScott EM, et al. Application of a modified form of the Glasgow pain scale in a veterinary teaching centre in the Netherlands. Vet Rec 2008; 162:403408.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Wagner AEWorland GAGlawe JC, et al. Multicenter, randomized controlled trial of pain-related behaviors following routine neutering in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008; 233:109115.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement

Comparison of surgical variables and short-term postoperative complications in healthy dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy or ovariectomy

Marijke E. PeetersDepartment of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Search for other papers by Marijke E. Peeters in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
and
Jolle KirpensteijnDepartment of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Search for other papers by Jolle Kirpensteijn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD, DACVS
View More View Less

Abstract

Objective—To determine whether ovariohysterectomy (OVH) required more time to complete and was associated with more short-term postoperative complications than ovariectomy (OVE) in dogs.

Design—Randomized prospective clinical trial.

Animals—40 healthy, sexually intact female dogs.

Procedures—OVH (in 20 dogs) or OVE (20 dogs) was performed by use of standardized anesthetic and surgical protocols. Physical characteristics of the dogs, surgical variables, pain scores derived from behavior-based composite pain scales, and surgical wound characteristics were analyzed.

Results—Body weight, age, body condition score, and distance between the sternal manubrium and the pubic rim were comparable among dogs that underwent either surgical procedure. Body weight was positively correlated with the total duration of the procedure and with time required for closure of the surgical wound. No effect of body condition score was determined for any variable. Skin and fascia incision lengths relative to the distance from the sternal manubrium to pubic rim were significantly greater in dogs that underwent OVH, compared with those of dogs that underwent OVE, but total surgical time was not different for the 2 procedures. No other significant differences were detected between the 2 groups.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Significant differences in total surgical time, pain scores, and wound scores were not observed between dogs that underwent OVH and dogs that underwent OVE via standardized protocols.

Abstract

Objective—To determine whether ovariohysterectomy (OVH) required more time to complete and was associated with more short-term postoperative complications than ovariectomy (OVE) in dogs.

Design—Randomized prospective clinical trial.

Animals—40 healthy, sexually intact female dogs.

Procedures—OVH (in 20 dogs) or OVE (20 dogs) was performed by use of standardized anesthetic and surgical protocols. Physical characteristics of the dogs, surgical variables, pain scores derived from behavior-based composite pain scales, and surgical wound characteristics were analyzed.

Results—Body weight, age, body condition score, and distance between the sternal manubrium and the pubic rim were comparable among dogs that underwent either surgical procedure. Body weight was positively correlated with the total duration of the procedure and with time required for closure of the surgical wound. No effect of body condition score was determined for any variable. Skin and fascia incision lengths relative to the distance from the sternal manubrium to pubic rim were significantly greater in dogs that underwent OVH, compared with those of dogs that underwent OVE, but total surgical time was not different for the 2 procedures. No other significant differences were detected between the 2 groups.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Significant differences in total surgical time, pain scores, and wound scores were not observed between dogs that underwent OVH and dogs that underwent OVE via standardized protocols.

Contributor Notes

Supported by Groep Geneeskunde van Gezelschapsdieren (Netherlands Association for Companion Animal Medicine).

The authors thank Menno Merkx, Angela Kersseboom, Liselotte Vink, Gabriëlle Baatje, and Mariska Vos for technical assistance.

Address correspondence to Dr. Peeters (M.E.Peeters@uu.nl).