Geographic, farm, and animal factors associated with multiple antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli isolates from cattle in the western United States

Anna C. BergeDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Anna C. Berge in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MPVM, PhD
,
Dale D. HancockDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164.

Search for other papers by Dale D. Hancock in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
William M. SischoDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by William M. Sischo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MPVM, PhD
, and
Thomas E. BesserDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164.

Search for other papers by Thomas E. Besser in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD, DACVM
View More View Less

Abstract

Objective—To describe geographic, farm-type, and animal-type factors associated with multiple antimicrobial resistance (MAR) in fecal Escherichia coli isolates from cattle.

Design—Cross-sectional field study.

Sample Population—1,736 fecal samples from cattle on 38 farms in California, Oregon, and Washington.

Procedures—Fecal samples were collected from preweaned calves (2 to 4 weeks old) and cows that recently calved on dairy and beef cow-calf farms, preweaned calves on calf ranches, and 1-year-old steers on feedlots. One fecal E coli isolate per sample was isolated, and antimicrobial susceptibility was tested. Escherichia coli isolates were initially clustered by antimicrobial resistance patterns and categorized by number of antimicrobial resistances. A generalized estimating equations cumulative logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with an increase in MAR in fecal E coli isolates from cattle.

Results—MAR was higher in E coli isolates from cattle in California, compared with those from cattle in Washington or Oregon. Multiple antimicrobial resistance was highest in E coli isolates from calves on calf ranches and progressively lower in isolates from feedlot steers, dairy cattle, and beef cattle. Multiple antimicrobial resistance was higher in E coli isolates from calves than from adult cattle, in E coli isolates from cattle of conventional farms than of organic farms, and in isolates from beef cattle in intensive dairy farm regions than from beef cattle distant from dairy farm regions.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—MAR in fecal E coli isolates from cattle was influenced by factors not directly associated with the use of antimicrobials, including geographic region, animal age, and purpose (beef vs dairy).

Abstract

Objective—To describe geographic, farm-type, and animal-type factors associated with multiple antimicrobial resistance (MAR) in fecal Escherichia coli isolates from cattle.

Design—Cross-sectional field study.

Sample Population—1,736 fecal samples from cattle on 38 farms in California, Oregon, and Washington.

Procedures—Fecal samples were collected from preweaned calves (2 to 4 weeks old) and cows that recently calved on dairy and beef cow-calf farms, preweaned calves on calf ranches, and 1-year-old steers on feedlots. One fecal E coli isolate per sample was isolated, and antimicrobial susceptibility was tested. Escherichia coli isolates were initially clustered by antimicrobial resistance patterns and categorized by number of antimicrobial resistances. A generalized estimating equations cumulative logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with an increase in MAR in fecal E coli isolates from cattle.

Results—MAR was higher in E coli isolates from cattle in California, compared with those from cattle in Washington or Oregon. Multiple antimicrobial resistance was highest in E coli isolates from calves on calf ranches and progressively lower in isolates from feedlot steers, dairy cattle, and beef cattle. Multiple antimicrobial resistance was higher in E coli isolates from calves than from adult cattle, in E coli isolates from cattle of conventional farms than of organic farms, and in isolates from beef cattle in intensive dairy farm regions than from beef cattle distant from dairy farm regions.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—MAR in fecal E coli isolates from cattle was influenced by factors not directly associated with the use of antimicrobials, including geographic region, animal age, and purpose (beef vs dairy).

Contributor Notes

Dr. Berge's present address is Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.

Dr. Sischo's present address is Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164.

Supported by the USDA NRI Epidemiological Approach to Food Safety grant 2001-35212-10844 and Western Institute for Food Safety and Security.

Address correspondence to Dr. Besser (tbesser@vetmed.wsu.edu).
  • 1.

    Joint FAO/WHO/OIE expert meeting on critically important antimicrobials. 26–30 November 2007, Rome, Italy. Available at: www.who.int/foodborne_disease/resources/Report%20joint%20CIA%20Meeting.pdf. Accessed Jun 14, 2009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Berge AC, Atwill ER, Sischo WM. Animal and farm influences on the dynamics of antibiotic resistance in faecal Escherichia coli in young dairy calves. Prev Vet Med 2005;69:2538.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Berge AC, Epperson WB, Pritchard RH. Assessing the effect of a single dose florfenicol treatment in feedlot cattle on the antimicrobial resistance patterns in faecal Escherichia coli. J Vet Res 2005;36:723734.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Hinton M. The ecology of Escherichia coli in animals including man with particular reference to drug resistance. Vet Rec 1986;119:420426.

  • 5.

    Khachatryan AR, Hancock DD & Besser TE, et al. Role of calf-adapted Escherichia coli in maintenance of antimicrobial drug resistance in dairy calves. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004;70:752757.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Walk ST, Mladonicky JM & Middleton JA, et al. Influence of antibiotic selection on genetic composition of Escherichia coli populations from conventional and organic dairy farms. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73:59825989.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Berge AC, Atwill ER, Sischo WM. Assessing antibiotic resistance in fecal Escherichia coli in young calves using cluster analysis techniques. Prev Vet Med 2003;61:91102.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Hoyle DV, Shaw DJ & Knight HI, et al. Age-related decline in carriage of ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli in young calves. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004;70:69276930.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Hinton M, Linton AH. Antibacterial drug resistance among Escherichia coli isolated from calves fed on a milk substitute diet. Vet Rec 1983;112:567568.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Langford FM, Weary DM, Fisher L. Antibiotic resistance in gut bacteria from dairy calves: a dose response to the level of antibiotics fed in milk. J Dairy Sci 2003;86:39633966.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Martel JL, Coudert M. Bacterial resistance monitoring in animals: the French national experiences of surveillance schemes. Vet Microbiol 1993;35:321338.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Brooks MB, Morley PS & Dargatz DA, et al. Survey of antimicrobial susceptibility testing practices of veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003;222:168173.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Caprioli A, Busani L & Martel JL, et al. Monitoring of antibiotic resistance in bacteria of animal origin: epidemiological and microbiological methodologies. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2000;14:295301.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Erb A, Stürmer T & Marre R, et al. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli: overview of geographical, temporal, and methodological variations. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2007;26:8390.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals. Approved standard, document number M31–A2. 2nd ed. Wayne, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, 2002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    EUCAST definitions of clinical breakpoints and epidemiological cut-off values. Available at: www.srga.org/Eucastwt/eucastdefinitions.htm. Accessed Jun 14, 2009.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Bauer AW, Kirby WM & Sherris JC, et al. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol 1966;45:493496.

  • 18.

    Sneath PH. Some thoughts on bacterial classification. J Gen Microbiol 1957;17:184200.

  • 19.

    Everitt BS, Rabe-Hesketh S. The analysis of proximity data. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1997.

  • 20.

    Carson CA, Reid-Smith R & Irwin RJ, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli from 29 beef farms in Ontario. Can J Vet Res 2008;72:119128.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Gow SP, Waldner CL & Rajic A, et al. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal generic Escherichia coli isolated in western Canadian cow-calf herds. Part I—beef calves. Can J Vet Res 2008;72:8290.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Call DR, Davis MA, Sawant AA. Antimicrobial resistance in beef and dairy cattle production. Anim Health Res Rev 2008;9:159167.

  • 23.

    Tragesser LA, Wittum TE & Funk JA, et al. Association between ceftiofur use and isolation of Escherichia coli with reduced susceptibility to ceftriaxone from fecal samples of dairy cows. Am J Vet Res 2006;67:16961700.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Gow SP, Waldner CL & Rajic A, et al. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal generic Escherichia coil isolated in western Canadian beef herds. Part II—cows and cow-calf pairs. Can J Vet Res 2008;72:91100.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Sawant AA, Sordillo LM, Jayarao BM. A survey on antibiotic usage in dairy herds in Pennsylvania. J Dairy Sci 2005;88:29912999.

  • 26.

    Levy SB. Antibiotic resistance: an ecological imbalance. Ciba Found Symp 1997;207:19.

  • 27.

    Kaneene JB, Warnick LD & Bolin CA, et al. Changes in tetracycline susceptibility of enteric bacteria following switching to nonmedicated milk replacer in dairy calves. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:19681977.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Kemper N. Veterinary antibiotics in the aquatic and terrestrial environment. Ecol Indic 2008;8:113.

  • 29.

    Dargatz DA, Fedorka-Cray PJ & Ladely SR, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;221:268272.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Stabler SL, Fagerberg DJ, Quarles CL. Effects of oral and injectable tetracyclines on bacterial drug resistance in feedlot cattle. Am J Vet Res 1982;43:17631766.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Khachatryan AR, Besser TE & Hancock DD, et al. Use of a non-medicated dietary supplement correlates with increased prevalence of streptomycin-sulfa-tetracycline resistant Escherichia coli on a dairy farm. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006;72:45834588.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement