• 1.

    Vig MM, Murray PA. Successful treatment of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus with fenbendazole. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1986;8:214222.

  • 2.

    Schalm OW, Ling GV, Smith JB. Lungworm infestation of cats. Calif Vet 1970;24:69.

  • 3.

    Hamilton JM. Aelurostrongylus abstrusus infestation of the cat. Vet Rec 1963;75:417422.

  • 4.

    Foster SF, Martin P, Robertson ID, et al.Lower respiratory tract infections in cats: 21 cases (1995–2000). J Feline Med Surg 2004;6:167180.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Naylor JR, Hamilton JM, Weatherley AJ. Changes in the ultrastructure of feline pulmonary arteries following infection with the lung-worm Aelurostrongylus abstrusus. Br Vet J 1984;140:181190.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Hamilton JM, Roberts RJ. Immunofluorescence as a diagnostic procedure in lungworm disease of the cat. Vet Rec 1968;83:401404.

  • 7.

    Singh B. Molecular methods for the diagnosis and epidemiological studies of parasitic infections. Int J Parasitol 1997;27:11351145.

  • 8.

    Kelly JD, Ng BKY, Whitlock HV. Helminth parasites of dogs and cats. Aust Vet Pract 1976;6:89100.

  • 9.

    Bowman DD. Georgis' parasitology for veterinarians. 6th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1995;340.

  • 10.

    Willard MD, Roberts RE, Allison N, et al.Diagnosis of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus and Dirofilaria immitis infections in cats from a human shelter. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1988;192:913916.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Speare R, Tinsley DJ. Strongyloides felis: an “old” worm rediscovered in Australian cats. Aust Vet Pract 1986;16:1018.

  • 12.

    Eysker M. The sensitivity of the Baermann method for the diagnosis of primary Dictyocaulus viviparus infections in calves. Vet Parasitol 1997;69:8993.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Beane RD, Hobbs NT. The Baermann technique for estimating Protostrongylus infection in bighorn sheep: effect of laboratory procedures. J Wildl Dis 1983;19:79.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Coman BJ, Jones EH, Driesen MA. Helminth parasites and arthropods of feral cats. Aust Vet J 1981;57:324327.

  • 15.

    Barrs VR, Swinney GR, Martin P, et al.Concurrent Aelurostrongylus abstrusus infection and salmonellosis in a kitten. Aust Vet J 1999;77:229232.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Foster SF, Martin P, Braddock JA, et al.A retrospective analysis of feline bronchoalveolar lavage cytology and microbiology (1995–2000). J Feline Med Surg 2004;6:189198.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Sherding RG. Chapter 73: parasites of the lung. In: King LG, ed. Textbook of respiratory disease in dogs and cats. St Louis: Saunders, 2004;551553.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    McCarthy GM, Quinn PJ. Bronchoalveolar lavage in the cat: cytological findings. Can J Vet Res 1989;53:259263.

  • 19.

    Hamilton JM, McCaw AW. An investigation into the longevity of first stage larvae of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus. J Helminthol 1967;41:313320.

  • 20.

    Hamilton JM. The influence of infestation by Aelurostrongylus abstrusus on the pulmonary vasculature of the cat. Br Vet J 1970;126:202209.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Hamilton JM. Experimental lungworm disease of the cat. J Comp Pathol 1966;76:147157.

  • 22.

    Hamilton JM. Pulmonary arterial disease of the cat. J Comp Pathol 1966;76:133145.

  • 23.

    Abramson JH. WINPEPI (PEPI-for-Windows): computer programs for epidemiologists. Epidemiol Perspect Innov 2004;1:6.

  • 24.

    Wilson EB. Probable interference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. J Am Stat Assoc 1927;22:209212.

  • 25.

    Zou G. From diagnostic accuracy to accurate diagnosis: interpreting a test result with confidence. Med Decis Making 2004;24:313318.

  • 26.

    Scott DW. Current knowledge of aelurostrongylosis in the cat. Literature review and case reports. Cornell Vet 1973;63:483500.

  • 27.

    Norris CR, Griffey SM, Samii VF, et al.Thoracic radiography, bronchoalveolar lavage cytopathology, and pulmonary parenchymal histopathology: a comparison of diagnostic results in 11 cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2002;38:337345.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Hawkins EC. Tracheal wash and bronchoalveolar lavage in the management of respiratory disease. In: Kirk RW, Bonagura JD, eds. Current veterinary therapy XI. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1995;795800.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Hawkins EC, Kennedy-Stoskopf S, Levy J, et al.Cytologic characterization of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid collected through an endotracheal tube in cats. Am J Vet Res 1994;55:795802.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Hawkins EC, DeNicola DB, Plier ML. Cytological analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in the diagnosis of spontaneous respiratory tract disease in dogs: a retrospective study. J Vet Intern Med 1995;9:386392.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Greenlee PG, Roszel JF. Feline bronchial cytology: histologic/cytologic correlation in 22 cats. Vet Pathol 1984;21:308315.

  • 32.

    Nichol S, Ball SJ, Snow KR. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in feral cats in some urban areas of England. Vet Parasitol 1981;9:107110.

  • 33.

    Mahlow JC, Slater MR. Current issues in the control of stray and feral cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996;209:20162020.

  • 34.

    Centonze LA, Levy JK. Characteristics of free-roaming cats and their caretakers. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;220:16271633.

  • 35.

    Remfry J. Feral cats in the United Kingdom. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996;208:520523.

  • 36.

    Levy JK, Gale DW, Gale LA. Evaluation of the effect of a long-term trap-neuter-return and adoption program on a free-roaming cat population. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003;222:4246.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement

Comparison of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid examination and other diagnostic techniques with the Baermann technique for detection of naturally occurring Aelurostrongylus abstrusus infection in cats

Lauren LacorciaDepartment of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC 3030, Australia.

Search for other papers by Lauren Lacorcia in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, MVSc
,
Robin B. GasserDepartment of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC 3030, Australia.

Search for other papers by Robin B. Gasser in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Dr med vet, PhD, DVSc
,
Garry A. AndersonDepartment of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC 3030, Australia.

Search for other papers by Garry A. Anderson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BAgrSc
, and
Ian BeveridgeDepartment of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Melbourne, Werribee, VIC 3030, Australia.

Search for other papers by Ian Beveridge in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, PhD, DVSc
View More View Less

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid examination and other diagnostic techniques, compared with the use of the Baermann technique performed on fecal samples as the reference standard, for detection of naturally occurring Aelurostrongylus abstrusus infection in a population of cats.

Design—Cross-sectional study.

Sample Population—Cadavers of 80 semiferal domestic cats.

Procedures—BAL fluid collection and analysis, necropsy, examination of fecal samples and minced lung tissue via the Baermann technique, fecal sedimentation-flotation, and histologic examination of lung tissue were performed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for detection of A abstrusus infection were calculated.

Results—On the basis of fecal Baermann test results, prevalence of infection was 13.8%. Sensitivity (NPV) of tests was as follows: Baermann technique on minced lung tissue, 81.8% (97.2%); fecal flotation-sedimentation, 63.6% (94.5%); stereomicroscopic examination of BAL fluid combined with cytologic examination of BAL fluid, 54.5% (93.2%); stereomicroscopic examination of BAL fluid alone, 45.4% (92.0%); cytologic examination of BAL fluid alone, 36.4% (90.8%); histologic examination of lung tissue, 45.4% (91.8%); and gross lung appearance, 36.4% (90.8%). Specificity and PPV of all tests were 100%, with the exception of histologic examination of lung tissue (specificity, 97.1%; PPV, 71.4%), which identified infected cats that had negative fecal Baermann test results.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—The Baermann technique was the most sensitive test for detection of A abstrusus infection. On the basis of the prevalence of 13.8% in this study, A abstrusus infection should be considered in pet cats.

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid examination and other diagnostic techniques, compared with the use of the Baermann technique performed on fecal samples as the reference standard, for detection of naturally occurring Aelurostrongylus abstrusus infection in a population of cats.

Design—Cross-sectional study.

Sample Population—Cadavers of 80 semiferal domestic cats.

Procedures—BAL fluid collection and analysis, necropsy, examination of fecal samples and minced lung tissue via the Baermann technique, fecal sedimentation-flotation, and histologic examination of lung tissue were performed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for detection of A abstrusus infection were calculated.

Results—On the basis of fecal Baermann test results, prevalence of infection was 13.8%. Sensitivity (NPV) of tests was as follows: Baermann technique on minced lung tissue, 81.8% (97.2%); fecal flotation-sedimentation, 63.6% (94.5%); stereomicroscopic examination of BAL fluid combined with cytologic examination of BAL fluid, 54.5% (93.2%); stereomicroscopic examination of BAL fluid alone, 45.4% (92.0%); cytologic examination of BAL fluid alone, 36.4% (90.8%); histologic examination of lung tissue, 45.4% (91.8%); and gross lung appearance, 36.4% (90.8%). Specificity and PPV of all tests were 100%, with the exception of histologic examination of lung tissue (specificity, 97.1%; PPV, 71.4%), which identified infected cats that had negative fecal Baermann test results.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—The Baermann technique was the most sensitive test for detection of A abstrusus infection. On the basis of the prevalence of 13.8% in this study, A abstrusus infection should be considered in pet cats.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Lacorcia's present address is Anderson Sturgess Veterinary Specialists, The Granary, Bunstead Barns, Poles Lane, Hursley, Hampshire, SO21 2LL, England.

This manuscript represents a portion of a thesis submitted by Dr. Lacorcia to The University of Melbourne as partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Master of Veterinary Science degree.

The authors thank Christine Andersen and Tanya Smith for technical assistance.

Address correspondence to Dr. Lacorcia.