• 1.

    Sandholm M, Kaartinen L, Pyölärä S. Bovine mastitis—why does antibiotic therapy not always work? An overview. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1990;13:248260.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Aarestrup FM. Veterinary drug usage and antimicrobial resistance in bacteria of animal origin. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2005;96:271281.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Pol M, Ruegg PL. Relationship between antimicrobial drug usage and antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive mastitis pathogens. J Dairy Sci 2007;90:262273.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Gruet P, Maincent P, Berthelot X, et al. Bovine mastitis and intramammary drug delivery: review and perspectives. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001;50:245259.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Erskine RJ, Kirk JH, Tyler JW, et al. Advances in the therapy for mastitis. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 1993;9:499517.

  • 6.

    Constable PD, Morin DE. Treatment of clinical mastitis. Using antimicrobial susceptibility profiles for treatment decisions. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2003;19:139155.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Owens WE, Ray CH, Watts JL, et al. Comparison of success of antibiotic therapy during lactation and results of antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bovine mastitis. J Dairy Sci 1997;80:313317.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Cattell MB, Dinsmore RP, Belschner AP, et al. Environmental gram-positive mastitis treatment: in vitro sensitivity and bacteriologic cure. J Dairy Sci 2001;84:20362043.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Constable PD, Morin DE. Use of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacterial pathogens isolated from the milk of dairy cows with clinical mastitis to predict response to treatment with cephapirin and oxytetracycline. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;221:103108.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Hoe FG, Ruegg PL. Relationship between antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical mastitis pathogens and treatment outcome in cows. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;227:14611468.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Pharmacia & Upjohn. Mastitis review document. Pirsue aqueous gel (pirlimycin hydrochloride aqueous gel) for treatment of clinical and subclinical mastitis in lactating cattle. Kalamazoo, Mich: Pharmacia & Upjohn, 1993.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Yancey R. Jr, Kinney ML, Ford CW. Efficacy of lincosaminide antibiotics in the treatment of experimental staphylococcal mastitis in lactating mice. J Antimicrob Chemother 1985;15:219232.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Thornsberry C, Marler JK, Watts JL, et al. Activity of pirlimycin against pathogens from cows with mastitis and recommendations for disk diffusion tests. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993;37:11221126.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    National Mastitis Council. Laboratory handbook on bovine mastitis. Madison, Wis: National Mastitis Council Inc, 1999.

  • 15.

    Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animal; approved standard—3rd ed. CLSI document M31-A3. Wayne, Pa: Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, 2007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Jensen MA, Webster JA, Straus N. Rapid identification of bacteria on the basis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified ribosomal DNA spacer polymorphisms. Appl Environ Microbiol 1993;59:945952.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Forsman P, Tilsala-Timisjärvi A, Alatossava T. Identification of staphylococcal and streptococcal causes of bovine mastitis using 16S-23S rRNA spacer regions. Microbiology 1997;143:34913500.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Weisblum B. Erythromycin resistance by ribosome modification. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995;39:577585.

  • 19.

    Owens WE, Ray CH, Washburn PJ. Effect of selected antibiotics on Staphylococcus aureus present in milk from infected mammary glands. Zentralbl Veterinarmed [B] 1993;40:508514.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Watts JL, Salmon SA. Activity of selected antimicrobial agents against strains of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine intramammary infections that produce E-lactamase. J Dairy Sci 1997;80:788791.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Dohoo IR, Leslie KE. Evaluation of changes in somatic cell counts as indicators of new intramammary infections. Prev Vet Med 1991;10:225237.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Schukken YH, Wilson DJ, Welcome F, et al. Monitoring udder health and milk quality using somatic cell counts. Vet Res 2003;34:579596.

  • 23.

    Seymour EH, Jones GM, McGilliard ML. Effectiveness of intramammary antibiotic therapy based on somatic cell count. J Dairy Sci 1989;72:10571062.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    McDermott MP, Erb HN, Natzke RP, et al. Cost benefit analysis of lactation therapy with somatic cell counts as indications for treatment. J Dairy Sci 1983;66:11981203.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Deluyker HA, Van Oy. SN, Boucher JF. Factors affecting cure and somatic cell count after pirlimycin treatment of subclinical mastitis in lactating cows. J Dairy Sci 2005;88:604614.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Oliver SP, Gillespie BE, Headrick SJ, et al. Efficacy of extended ceftiofur intramammary therapy for treatment of subclinical mastitis in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2004;87:23932400.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Ruegg PL. The quest for the perfect test: phenotypic versus genotypic identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci associated with bovine mastitis. Vet Microbiol 2009;134:1519.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Erskine R, Cullor J, Schaellibaum MB, et al. Bovine mastitis pathogens and trends in resistance to antibacterial drugs, in Proceedings. 43rd NMC Annu Meet 2004;400414.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Deubler MJ, Cole EJ. Preliminary studies on Pseudomonas mastitis. Am J Vet Res 1955;16:511514.

  • 30.

    Ziv G. Drug selection and use in mastitis: systemic vs local therapy. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1980;176:11091115.

  • 31.

    Owens WE, Watts JL. Effects of milk on activity of antimicrobics against Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine udders. J Dairy Sci 1987;70:19461951.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Owens WE, Nickerson SC. Antibiotic levels in milk and mammary tissues during various treatment regimens for bovine mastitis. Agri-Pract 1989;10:1015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Clinical Laborator. Standards Institute. Development of in vitro susceptibility testing criteria and quality control parameters for veterinary antimicrobial agents; approved guideline—2nd ed. CLSI document M37-A2. Wayne, Pa: Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, 2002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Forrest A, Nix DE, Ballow CH, et al. Pharmacodynamics of intravenous ciprofloxacin in seriously ill patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993;37:10731081.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Dingwell RT, Leslie KE, Duffield TF, et al. Efficacy of intramammary tilmicosin and risk factors for cure of Staphylococcus aureus infection in the dry period. J Dairy Sci 2003;86:159168.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Gillespie BE, Moorehead H, Lunn P, et al. Efficacy of extended pirlimycin hydrochloride therapy for treatment of environmental Streptococcus spp and Staphylococcus aureus intramammary infections in lactating dairy cows. Vet Ther 2002;3:373380.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Middleton JR, Timms LL, Bader GR, et al. Effect of prepartum intramammary treatment with pirlimycin hydrochloride on prevalence of early first-lactation mastitis in dairy heifers. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;227:19691974.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement

Relationship between results of in vitro susceptibility tests and outcomes following treatment with pirlimycin hydrochloride in cows with subclinical mastitis associated with gram-positive pathogens

Dhananjay ApparaoDepartment of Dairy Science, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.

Search for other papers by Dhananjay Apparao in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, MS
,
Leane OliveiraDepartment of Dairy Science, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.

Search for other papers by Leane Oliveira in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MV
, and
Pamela L. RueggDepartment of Dairy Science, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.

Search for other papers by Pamela L. Ruegg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MPVM, DABVP
View More View Less

Abstract

Objective—To determine the association between results of in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility tests and outcomes in cows that received intramammary treatment with pirlimycin hydrochloride for subclinical mastitis associated with gram-positive pathogens.

Design—Case-control study.

Animals—132 dairy cows (178 mammary glands with subclinical mastitis caused by 194 pathogen isolates).

Procedures—Cows with positive results for a California mastitis test (CMT) were assigned to receive 50 mg of pirlimycin via intramammary administration into each CMT-positive mammary gland every 24 hours for 2 consecutive days or no treatment. Duplicate milk samples were collected before treatment and approximately 21 days later. Target pathogens included coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp (n = 118 isolates), Streptococcus spp (28), Staphylococcus aureus (7), and other gram-positive cocci (30). Antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined via broth microdilution.

Results—Overall treatment success rate was 66% (128/194) for both groups. In vitro resistance to pirlimycin ranged from 0% (0/7 isolates of S aureus) to 50% (13/26 isolates of other gram-positive cocci). For the treated group, 62 of 94 (66%) target pathogens were classified as treatment successes and 32 (34%) were classified as failures. Similarly for the control group, 66 of 100 (66%) target pathogens were classified as treatment successes, whereas 34 (34%) were classified as failures.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Many target pathogens from cows with subclinical mastitis were eliminated without treatment, and treatment with pirlimycin did not improve the treatment success rate. Results of in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility tests were not useful as predictors of treatment success following intramammary treatment with pirlimycin.

Abstract

Objective—To determine the association between results of in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility tests and outcomes in cows that received intramammary treatment with pirlimycin hydrochloride for subclinical mastitis associated with gram-positive pathogens.

Design—Case-control study.

Animals—132 dairy cows (178 mammary glands with subclinical mastitis caused by 194 pathogen isolates).

Procedures—Cows with positive results for a California mastitis test (CMT) were assigned to receive 50 mg of pirlimycin via intramammary administration into each CMT-positive mammary gland every 24 hours for 2 consecutive days or no treatment. Duplicate milk samples were collected before treatment and approximately 21 days later. Target pathogens included coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp (n = 118 isolates), Streptococcus spp (28), Staphylococcus aureus (7), and other gram-positive cocci (30). Antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined via broth microdilution.

Results—Overall treatment success rate was 66% (128/194) for both groups. In vitro resistance to pirlimycin ranged from 0% (0/7 isolates of S aureus) to 50% (13/26 isolates of other gram-positive cocci). For the treated group, 62 of 94 (66%) target pathogens were classified as treatment successes and 32 (34%) were classified as failures. Similarly for the control group, 66 of 100 (66%) target pathogens were classified as treatment successes, whereas 34 (34%) were classified as failures.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Many target pathogens from cows with subclinical mastitis were eliminated without treatment, and treatment with pirlimycin did not improve the treatment success rate. Results of in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility tests were not useful as predictors of treatment success following intramammary treatment with pirlimycin.

Contributor Notes

Supported by USDA Hatch Funds as part of the NE 1009, multistate research project.

Address correspondence to Dr. Ruegg.