Comparison of published recommendations regarding biosecurity practices for various production animal species and classes

Dale A. Moore Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Dale A. Moore in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MPVM, PhD, DACVPM
,
Marcia L. Merryman Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Marcia L. Merryman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Marla L. Hartman Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Marla L. Hartman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Donald J. Klingborg Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.

Search for other papers by Donald J. Klingborg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM

Click on author name to view affiliation information

Abstract

Objective—To compare published recommendations regarding biosecurity practices for various production animal species and classes.

Design—Literature review.

Population—Educational materials available on the World Wide Web that provided biosecurity recommendations for dairy cattle, beef cattle, small ruminant, swine, and poultry producers.

Procedures—Web sites for national producer organizations, university cooperative extension services, and state departments of agriculture were searched to identify educational materials with biosecurity recommendations.

Results—A single national organization was selected as representing each animal agriculture commodity group. A total of 53 university Web sites were visited, and 65 publications prepared by university cooperative extension services were identified and evaluated. Web sites for all 50 state departments of agriculture were searched, and 29 were found to have at least 1 publication related to biosecurity practices, for a total of 46 publications. Evaluation of the biosecurity recommendations revealed wide variations by source and within and among commodity groups.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggested that educational materials for producers contained wide variations in recommended biosecurity practices. It is possible that some producers choose not to implement biosecurity recommendations because of confusion as to the specific recommendations they should follow.

Abstract

Objective—To compare published recommendations regarding biosecurity practices for various production animal species and classes.

Design—Literature review.

Population—Educational materials available on the World Wide Web that provided biosecurity recommendations for dairy cattle, beef cattle, small ruminant, swine, and poultry producers.

Procedures—Web sites for national producer organizations, university cooperative extension services, and state departments of agriculture were searched to identify educational materials with biosecurity recommendations.

Results—A single national organization was selected as representing each animal agriculture commodity group. A total of 53 university Web sites were visited, and 65 publications prepared by university cooperative extension services were identified and evaluated. Web sites for all 50 state departments of agriculture were searched, and 29 were found to have at least 1 publication related to biosecurity practices, for a total of 46 publications. Evaluation of the biosecurity recommendations revealed wide variations by source and within and among commodity groups.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results suggested that educational materials for producers contained wide variations in recommended biosecurity practices. It is possible that some producers choose not to implement biosecurity recommendations because of confusion as to the specific recommendations they should follow.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 338 0 0
Full Text Views 1025 863 131
PDF Downloads 386 252 34
Advertisement