• 1.

    Rideout BA, Brown ST & Davis WC, et al. Diagnosis and control of Johne's disease. Washington, DC: National Research Council, 2003.

  • 2.

    Hasonova L, Pavlik I. Economic impact of paratuberculosis in dairy cattle herds: a review. Vet Med (Praha) 2006;51:193211.

  • 3.

    Collins MT, Morgan IR. Simulation model of paratuberculosis control in dairy cattle. Prev Vet Med 1992;14:2132.

  • 4.

    Groenendaal H, Nielen M & Jalvingh AW, et al. A simulation of Johne's disease control. Prev Vet Med 2002;54:225245.

  • 5.

    Kudahl AB, Østergaarda S & Sørensen JT, et al. A stochastic model simulating paratuberculosis in a dairy herd. Prev Vet Med 2007;78:97117.

  • 6.

    Ott SL, Wells SJ, Wagner BA. Herd-level economic losses associated with Johne's disease on US dairy operations. Prev Vet Med 1999;44:17.

  • 7.

    Van Schaik G, Kalis CHJ & Benedictus G, et al. Cost-benefit analysis of vaccination against paratuberculosis in dairy cattle. Vet Rec 1996;139:624627.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Collins MT, Gardner IA & Garry FB, et al. Consensus recommendations on diagnostic testing for the detection of paratuberculosis in cattle in the United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006;229:19121919.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Van Arendonk JAM. Studies on the replacement policies in dairy cattle II. Optimum policy and influence of changes in production and prices. Livest Prod Sci 1984;14:101121.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Groenendaal H, Galligan DT, Mulder H. An economic spreadsheet model to determine optimal breeding and replacement decisions for dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2004;87:21462157.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. Farms, land in farms, and livestock operations 2007 summary. February 2008. Available at: usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/FarmLandIn/FarmLandIn-02-01-2008_revision.pdf. Accessed Mar 17, 2008.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Brealey RA, Myers SC. Chapter 5: why net present value leads to better investment decisions. In: Principles of corporate finance. 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co, 2007;84111.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement

Farm-level economic analysis of the US National Johne's Disease Demonstration Herd Project

View More View Less
  • 1 Vose Consulting US LLC, 2891 20th St, Boulder, CO 80304
  • | 2 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1039

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate farm-level economic costs and benefits related to control of paratuberculosis (Johne's disease) in dairy herds in the National Johne's Disease Demonstration Herd Project (NJDDHP).

Design—Economic analysis.

Sample Population—40 dairy herds enrolled in the NJDDHP.

Procedures—A farm-level economic analysis of the US NJDDHP was performed. Costs and benefits of management-related practices to control Johne's disease were estimated on the basis of results for 40 dairy operations enrolled in the project. From these costs and benefits, the net present value (NPV) for control of Johne's disease was estimated.

Results—Analysis revealed a mean NPV of $34/animal (equivalent to approx $3/animal/y) when there were no testing costs for producers and a mean NPV of −$14/animal when testing costs were borne by the producers.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Management-related practices to control Johne's disease were typically found to be of marginal economic benefit when the costs of testing were not borne by producers. The continuation of the NJDDHP for another 2 to 4 years would allow more precise estimation of the economic benefits of a control program for Johne's disease.

Contributor Notes

Supported by the USDA, APHIS.

The authors thank Dr. J. E. Lombard and Dr. A. H. Seitzinger for their contributions to the study design, data collection, and analysis of the results of the study, and Greg Nolder for assistance in performing the economic analysis.

Address correspondence to Dr. Groenendaal.