Systematic review of clinical trials of treatments for osteoarthritis in dogs

Carlos L. Aragon Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.

Search for other papers by Carlos L. Aragon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Erik H. Hofmeister Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.

Search for other papers by Erik H. Hofmeister in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, DACVA
, and
Steven C. Budsberg Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.

Search for other papers by Steven C. Budsberg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS, DACVS

Abstract

Objective—To identify and critically evaluate the quality of evidence of the most commonly used pharmacologic, nutraceutical, and purported slow-acting drugs of osteoarthritis for the management of osteoarthritis in dogs by use of the FDA's evidence-based medicine scoring system.

Design—Systematic review.

Sample Population—16 clinical trials.

Procedures—A broad bibliographic search was performed prior to May 2006. Inclusion criteria focused on prospective trials evaluating commonly used medical treatment interventions for the management of osteoarthritis in dogs and published in peer-reviewed journals. The analysis consisted of the following: study design rating, quality factor rating, quantity rating, consistency rating, relevance to disease risk reduction rating, and cumulative strength of evidence ranking.

Results—4 trials evaluating meloxicam were rated as type I.Three trials evaluating carprofen were rated as type I, and 2 trials were rated as type III. One trial evaluating each of the following agents was rated as type 1: etodolac; P54FP; polysulfated glycosaminoglycan; and a combination of chondroitin sulfate, glucosamine hydrochloride, and manganese ascorbate. Two trials evaluating pentosan polysulphate and 2 trails evaluating green-lipped mussels were rated as type I. One trial evaluating hyaluronan was rated as type III.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—A high level of comfort exists for meloxicam that the claimed relationship is scientifically valid and that its use is clinically efficacious for the treatment of osteoarthritis in dogs.A moderate level of comfort exists for carprofen; etodolac; pentosan polysulphate; green-lipped mussels; P54FP; polysulfated glycosaminoglycans; and a combination of chondroitin sulfate, glucosamine hydrochloride, and manganese ascorbate. An extremely low level of comfort exists for hyaluronan.

Abstract

Objective—To identify and critically evaluate the quality of evidence of the most commonly used pharmacologic, nutraceutical, and purported slow-acting drugs of osteoarthritis for the management of osteoarthritis in dogs by use of the FDA's evidence-based medicine scoring system.

Design—Systematic review.

Sample Population—16 clinical trials.

Procedures—A broad bibliographic search was performed prior to May 2006. Inclusion criteria focused on prospective trials evaluating commonly used medical treatment interventions for the management of osteoarthritis in dogs and published in peer-reviewed journals. The analysis consisted of the following: study design rating, quality factor rating, quantity rating, consistency rating, relevance to disease risk reduction rating, and cumulative strength of evidence ranking.

Results—4 trials evaluating meloxicam were rated as type I.Three trials evaluating carprofen were rated as type I, and 2 trials were rated as type III. One trial evaluating each of the following agents was rated as type 1: etodolac; P54FP; polysulfated glycosaminoglycan; and a combination of chondroitin sulfate, glucosamine hydrochloride, and manganese ascorbate. Two trials evaluating pentosan polysulphate and 2 trails evaluating green-lipped mussels were rated as type I. One trial evaluating hyaluronan was rated as type III.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—A high level of comfort exists for meloxicam that the claimed relationship is scientifically valid and that its use is clinically efficacious for the treatment of osteoarthritis in dogs.A moderate level of comfort exists for carprofen; etodolac; pentosan polysulphate; green-lipped mussels; P54FP; polysulfated glycosaminoglycans; and a combination of chondroitin sulfate, glucosamine hydrochloride, and manganese ascorbate. An extremely low level of comfort exists for hyaluronan.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Aragon's present address is MedVet Associates Ltd, Veterinary Surgeons of Ohio, 300 E Wilson Bridge Rd, Worthington, OH 43085.

Address correspondence to Dr. Aragon.
  • 1

    Johnson SA. Osteoarthritis: joint anatomy, physiology, and pathobiology. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1997;27:699723.

  • 2

    Roush JK, McLaughlin RM, Radlinsky MG. Understanding the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis. Vet Med 2002;97:108117.

  • 3

    McLaughlin RM. Management of chronic osteoarthritic pain. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2000;30:933949.

  • 4

    Budsberg SC. Outcome assessment in clinical trials involving medical management of osteoarthritis in small animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1997;27:815823.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Lequesne M, Altman R, Bellamy N, et al. Guidelines for testing slow acting drugs in OA (SASOA). J Rheumatol 1994;21:6571.

  • 6

    Moreau M, Dupuis J, Bonneau NH, et al. Clinical evaluation of a nutraceutical, carprofen and meloxicam for the treatment of dogs with osteoarthritis. Vet Rec 2003;152:323329.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Peterson KD, Keefe TJ. Effects of meloxicam on severity of lameness and other clinical signs of osteoarthritis in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004;225:10561060.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Doig PA, Purbrick KA, Hare JE, et al. Clinical efficacy and tolerance of meloxicam in dogs with chronic osteoarthritis. Can Vet J 2000;41:296300.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Nell T, Bergman J, Hoeijmakers M, et al. Comparison of vedaprofen and meloxicam in dogs with musculoskeletal pain and inflammation. J Small Anim Pract 2002;43:208212.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Lipscomb VJ, AliAbadi FS, Lees P, et al. Clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics of carprofen in the treatment of dogs with osteoarthritis. Vet Rec 2002;150:684689.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Schneider TA, Budsberg SC. Plasma and synovial concentrations of carprofen in dogs with chronic osteoarthritis. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2001;14:1924.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Holtsinger RH, Parker RB, Beale BS, et al. The therapeutic efficacy of carprofen (Rimadyl-v™) in 209 clinical cases of canine degenerative joint disease. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1992;5:140144.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Vasseur PB, Johnson AL, Budsberg SC, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of the efficacy of carprofen, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, in the treatment of osteoarthritis in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995;206:807811.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Budsberg SC, Johnston SA, Schwarz PD, et al. Efficacy of etodolac for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip joints in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999;214:206210.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Innes JF, Barr RS, Sharif BM. Efficacy of oral calcium pentosan polysulphate for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the canine stifle joint secondary to cranial cruciate ligament deficiency. Vet Rec 2000;146:433437.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Read RA, Cullis-Hill D, Jones MP. Systemic use of pentosan polysulphate in the treatment of osteoarthritis. J Small Anim Pract 1996;37:108114.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Bui LM, Bierer TL. Influence of green lipped mussels (Perna canaliculus) in alleviating signs of arthritis in dogs. Vet Ther 2003;4:397407.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Bierer TL, Bui LM. Improvement of arthritic signs in dogs fed green-lipped mussel (Perna canaliculus). Am Soc Nutr Sci 2002;132:1634S1636S.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    de Haan JJ, Goring RL, Beale BS. Evaluation of polysulfated glycosaminoglycan for the treatment of hip dysplasia in dogs. Vet Surg 1994;23:177181.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Brandt KD, Smith GN, Myers SL. Hyaluronan injection affects neither osteoarthritis progression nor loading of the OA knee in dogs. Biorheology 2004;41:493502.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Innes JF, Fuller CJ, Grover ER, et al. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group study of P54FP for the treatment of dogs with osteoarthritis. Vet Rec 2003;152:457460.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Boothe DM. Nutraceuticals in veterinary medicine. Part II. Safety and efficacy. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1998;20:1521.

  • 23

    US FDA Web site. Interim evidence-based ranking system for scientific data. Available at: www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/hclmgui4.html. Accessed May 16, 2005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Dupont WD, Plummer WD Jr. Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Control Clin Trials 1990;11:116128.

  • 25

    Aragon CL, Budsberg SC. Applications of evidence-based medicine: cranial cruciate ligament injury repair in the dog. Vet Surg 2005;34:9398.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Forsyth SF, Guilford WG, Haslett SJ, et al. Endoscopy of the gastroduodenal mucosa after carprofen, meloxicam and ketoprofen administration in dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1998;39:421424.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Fox SM, Johnson SA. Use of carprofen for the treatment of pain and inflammation in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997;210:14931498.

  • 28

    Jenkins CC, Kanara EW. First-year clinical experience with Rimadyl (carprofen): assessment of product safety. Pfizer Animal Health Technical Bulletin, May 1998.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Fox SM, Campbell S. Update: two years (1997–1998) clinical experience with Rimadyl (carprofen). Pfizer Animal Health Technical Bulletin, August 1999.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    MacPhail CM, Lappin MR, Meyer DJ, et al. Hepatocellular toxicosis associated with administration of carprofen in 21 dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998;212:18951901.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Ghosh P. The pathobiology of osteoarthritis and the rationale for the use of pentosan polysulfate for its treatment. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1999;28:211267.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Francis DJ, Hutadilok N, Kongtawelert P, et al. Pentosan polysulphate and glycosaminoglycan polysulphate stimulates the synthesis of hyaluronan in vivo. Rheumatol Int 1993;13:6164.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Golding JC, Ghosh P. Drugs for osteoarthritis. The effects of pentosan polysulfate (SP54) on the degradation and loss of proteoglycans from articular cartilage in a model of osteoarthrosis induced in the rabbit knee joint by immobilation. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 1983;33:173184.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Ammon HPT, Wahl MA. Pharmacology of curcuma-longa. Planta Medica 1991;57:17.

  • 35

    Miquel J, Bernd A, Sempere JM, et al. The curcuma antioxidants: pharmacological effects and prospects for future clinical use. A review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2002;34:3746.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998.

  • 37

    Levine M, Ensom MHH. Post hoc power analysis: an idea whose time has passed? Pharmacotherapy 2001;21:405409.

  • 38

    Maggard MA, O'Connel JB, Liu JH, et al. Sample size calculations in surgery: are they done correctly? Surgery 2003;134:275279.

  • 39

    Freedman KB, Back S, Bernstein J. Sample size and statistical power of randomized, controlled trials in orthopedics J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001;83-B:397402.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement