• 1

    Patronek GJ, Rauch A. Systematic review of comparative studies examining alternatives to the harmful use of animals in biomedical education. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007;230:3743.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Parker JS. Sees review of biomedical education methods as biased [lett]. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007;230: 657.

  • 3

    Definition of bias. Available at: www.dictionary.com. Accessed Apr 1, 2007.

  • 4

    Knight A. Humane teaching methods demonstrate efficacy in veterinary education. In:Dandie G, ed.ANZCCART Conference 2006: proceedings. South Australia, Australia: Australian & New Zealand Council for the Care of Animals in Research and Teaching (ANZCCART), 2007;in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Jukes N, Chiuia M. From guinea pig to computer mouse: alternative methods for a progressive, humane education. 2nd ed.Leicester, England: InterNICHE, 2003. Available at: www.interniche.org/book.html. Accessed Apr 5, 2007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Knight A. Humane education resources. Available at: www.HumaneLearning.info. Accessed Apr 5, 2007.

  • 7

    Weng H. Teaching protocols: veterinary medicine. Available at: www.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/Animal_Alternatives. Accessed Apr 5, 2007.

  • 1

    Available as part of the public record in the case of The Humane Society of the United States v Patrick H. Brennan, index No. 7704-06, Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Albany, 2006.

  • 2

    The Farm Sanctuary. Available at: www.nofoiegras.org. Accessed Apr 23, 2007.

  • 3

    Animal Protection & Rescue League and In Defense of Animals. Stop force feeding. www.stopforcefeeding.com.

Advertisement

Letters to the Editor