Advertisement
ProCite
RefWorks
Reference Manager
BibTeX
Zotero
EndNote
-
1
Patronek GJ, Rauch A. Systematic review of comparative studies examining alternatives to the harmful use of animals in biomedical education. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007;230:37–43.
-
2
Parker JS. Sees review of biomedical education methods as biased [lett]. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007;230: 657.
-
3
Definition of bias. Available at: www.dictionary.com. Accessed Apr 1, 2007.
-
4
Knight A. Humane teaching methods demonstrate efficacy in veterinary education. In:Dandie G, ed.ANZCCART Conference 2006: proceedings. South Australia, Australia: Australian & New Zealand Council for the Care of Animals in Research and Teaching (ANZCCART), 2007;in press.
-
5
Jukes N, Chiuia M. From guinea pig to computer mouse: alternative methods for a progressive, humane education. 2nd ed.Leicester, England: InterNICHE, 2003. Available at: www.interniche.org/book.html. Accessed Apr 5, 2007.
-
6
Knight A. Humane education resources. Available at: www.HumaneLearning.info. Accessed Apr 5, 2007.
-
7
Weng H. Teaching protocols: veterinary medicine. Available at: www.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/Animal_Alternatives. Accessed Apr 5, 2007.
-
1
Available as part of the public record in the case of The Humane Society of the United States v Patrick H. Brennan, index No. 7704-06, Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Albany, 2006.
-
2
The Farm Sanctuary. Available at: www.nofoiegras.org. Accessed Apr 23, 2007.
-
3
Animal Protection & Rescue League and In Defense of Animals. Stop force feeding. www.stopforcefeeding.com.
Advertisement
Letters to the Editor
Powered by PubFactory