• 1

    AVMA. Task force appointed to review pregnant sow housing data. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004;224:15.

  • 2

    AVMA. Sow housing task force members appointed. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004;224:1730.

  • 3

    Rhodes TR, Appleby MC, Chinn K, et al. A comprehensive review of housing for pregnant sows. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;227:15801590.

  • 4

    Rollin BE. Euthanasia and quality of life. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006;228:10141016.

  • 5

    Europa Web site. Council Directive 2001/88/EC. Amending directive 91/630/EEC laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs. October 23, 2001. Available at: ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/references_en.htm. Accessed Aug 16, 2006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Europa Web site. Council Directive 2001/93/EC. Amending directive 91/630/EEC laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs. November 9, 2001. Available at: ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/references_en.htm. Accessed Aug 16, 2006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Government Offices of Sweden. The animal welfare act, the animal welfare ordinance. Available at: www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/2016/a/25844. Accessed May 28, 2006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Animal Welfare Institute. Husbandry criteria for pigs. Available at: www.awionline.org/farm/standards/pigs.htm. Accessed May 28, 2006.

  • 9

    Animal Welfare Institute. A successful system for housing pregnant sows in groups. Anim Welfare Inst Q [serial online] 2004;53(1):6. Available at: www.awionline.org/pubs/Quarterly/04-53-1/531p6.htm. Accessed May 28, 2006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Johnson AK, Morrow-Tesch J, McGlone JJ. Behavior and performance of lactating sows and piglets reared indoors or outdoors. J Anim Sci 2001;79:25712579.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Humane Society of the United States. Veal fact sheet. Available at: www.hsus.org/farm_animals/factory_farms/veal/veal_fact_sheet.html. Accessed May 28, 2006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Broom DM, Kirkden RD. Welfare, stress, behaviour and pathophysiology. In: Dunlop RH, Malbert C-H, eds.Veterinary patho-physiology. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State Press, 2004;337369.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Fullwood SD, McGlone JJ. Stereotyped oral/nasal/facial behaviors, reproduction and immunity of crated sows: effects of high dietary fiber and rearing environment. J Anim Sci 2001;79:14661474.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Dailey J, McGlone JJ. Oral/nasal/facial and other behaviors of sows kept individually outdoors on pasture, soil or indoors in gestation crates. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1997;52:2543.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Hulbert L, McGlone J. Evaluation of drop vs. trickle feeding systems for crated or group penned gestating sows. J Anim Sci 2006;84:10041014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Lawrence AB, Terlouw EM. A review of behavioral factors involved in the development and continued performance of stereotypic behaviors in pigs. J Anim Sci 1993;71:28152825.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    National Pork Board. SWAP program. Available at: www.pork.org/Producers/SWAP/swapManual.aspx. Accessed May 28, 2006.

  • 18

    National Pork Board. Swine care handbook. Table 2. Available at: www.porkboard.org/docs/swinecarehandbook.pdf. Accessed May 28, 2006.

Advertisement

Comparison of sow welfare in the Swedish deep-bedded system and the US crated-sow system

View More View Less
  • 1 Pork Industry Institute, Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409-2141.