• 1

    Weiss DJ. Recognition and classification of dysmyelopoiesis in the dog: a review. J Vet Intern Med 2005; 19: 147154.

  • 2

    Weiss DJ, Aird B. Cytologic evaluation of primary and secondary myelodysplastic syndromes in the dog. Vet Clin Pathol 2001; 30: 6775.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Blue JT. Myelodysplastic syndromes and myelofibrosis. In: Feldman BF, Zinkl JG, Jain NC, ed. Schalm's veterinary hematology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000; 682688.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniels MT, et al. Proposals for the classification of the acute leukemias. Br J Haematol 1982; 51: 189199.

  • 5

    Jain NC. Classification of myeloproliferative disorders in cats using the criteria proposed by the animal leukemia study group: a retrospective study of 181 cases (1969–1992). Comp Haematol Int 1993; 3: 125134.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Raskin RE. Myelopoiesis and myeloproliferative disorders. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1996; 26: 10231042.

  • 7

    Germing U, Gattermann N, Strupp C, et al. Validation of the WHO proposal for a new classification of primary myelodysplastic syndromes: a retrospective analysis of 1600 patients. Leuk Res 2000; 24: 983992.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Hisasue M, Nishigaki K, Katae H, et al. Clonality analysis of various hematopoietic disorders in cats naturally infected with feline leukemia virus. J Vet Med Sci 2000; 62: 10591065.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Schuetz TJ, Stone RM. Myelodysplastic syndromes. In: Provan D, Gribben J, eds. Molecular hematology. New York: Blackwell Science, 1999;7584.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Jacobs G, Calvert C, Kaufman A. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in three dogs treated with anticonvulsants. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998; 212: 681684.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Madewell BR. Adverse effects of chemotherapy. In: Kirk RW, ed. Current veterinary therapy VIII. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1983;419432.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Jain NC, Blue JT, Grindem CB, et al. Proposed criteria for classification of acute myeloid leukemias in dogs and cats. Vet Clin Pathol 199; 20: 6382.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Shimoda T, Shiranaga N, Mashita T, et al. A hematologic study of thirteen cats with myelodysplastic syndrome. J Vet Med Sci 2000; 62: 5964.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Hisasue M, Okayama H, Okayama T, et al. Hematologic abnormalities and outcome of 16 cats with myelodysplastic syndromes. J Vet Intern Med 2001; 15: 471477.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Blue JT, French TW, Kranz JS. Nonlymphoid hematopoietic neoplasia in cats: a retrospective study of 60 cases. Cornell Vet 1988; 78: 2142.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Penny RHC, Carkuske CH, Davidson HA. The blood and marrow picture of the cat. Br Vet J 1970; 126: 459463.

  • 17

    Stokol T, Blue JT. Pure red cell aplasia in cats: 9 cases (1989–1997). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999; 214: 7579.

  • 18

    Weiss DJ. Differentiating benign and malignant causes of lymphocytosis in feline bone marrow. J Vet Intern Med 2006; in press.

Advertisement

Evaluation of dysmyelopoiesis in cats: 34 cases (1996–2005)

Douglas J. WeissDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108.

Search for other papers by Douglas J. Weiss in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD, DACVP
View More View Less

Abstract

Objective—To further classify dysmyelopoiesis as diagnosed by use of a general classification scheme and to determine clinical features and laboratory test results that could be used to differentiate between the various forms of dysmyelopoiesis in cats.

Design—Retrospective case series.

Sample Population—Bone marrow slides from 34 cats.

Procedures—Medical records of cats in which dysmyelopoiesis was diagnosed on the basis of blood and bone marrow analyses from 1996 to 2005 were reviewed. Criteria for inclusion in the study were findings of > 10% dysplastic cells in 1 or more hematologic cell lines in the bone marrow and concurrent cytopenias in the blood. Cats that met these criteria were classified into subcategories of myelodysplastic syndromes or secondary dysmyelopoiesis on the basis of reevaluation of slides.

Results—Of 189 bone marrow slides reviewed, 34 (14.9%) had > 10% dysplastic cells in 1 or more cell lines. Cats were subcategorized as having myelodys-plastic syndrome with excessive numbers of blast cells (n = 13), myelodysplastic syndrome with refractory cytopenias (8), a variant form of myelodysplastic syndrome (1), and secondary dysmyelopoiesis (12). Findings of dysmyelopoiesis and autoagglutination in cats with myelodysplastic syndrome and in those with immune-mediated anemia complicated differentiating between the 2 conditions.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Differentiating cats with myelodysplastic syndromes from cats with immune-mediated hemolytic anemia was difficult because severe anemia and autoagglutination may be concurrent findings in both conditions. Differentiating between myelodysplastic syndrome with excessive numbers of blast cells and myelodysplastic syndrome with refractory cytopenias was useful in predicting clinical outcome.

Abstract

Objective—To further classify dysmyelopoiesis as diagnosed by use of a general classification scheme and to determine clinical features and laboratory test results that could be used to differentiate between the various forms of dysmyelopoiesis in cats.

Design—Retrospective case series.

Sample Population—Bone marrow slides from 34 cats.

Procedures—Medical records of cats in which dysmyelopoiesis was diagnosed on the basis of blood and bone marrow analyses from 1996 to 2005 were reviewed. Criteria for inclusion in the study were findings of > 10% dysplastic cells in 1 or more hematologic cell lines in the bone marrow and concurrent cytopenias in the blood. Cats that met these criteria were classified into subcategories of myelodysplastic syndromes or secondary dysmyelopoiesis on the basis of reevaluation of slides.

Results—Of 189 bone marrow slides reviewed, 34 (14.9%) had > 10% dysplastic cells in 1 or more cell lines. Cats were subcategorized as having myelodys-plastic syndrome with excessive numbers of blast cells (n = 13), myelodysplastic syndrome with refractory cytopenias (8), a variant form of myelodysplastic syndrome (1), and secondary dysmyelopoiesis (12). Findings of dysmyelopoiesis and autoagglutination in cats with myelodysplastic syndrome and in those with immune-mediated anemia complicated differentiating between the 2 conditions.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Differentiating cats with myelodysplastic syndromes from cats with immune-mediated hemolytic anemia was difficult because severe anemia and autoagglutination may be concurrent findings in both conditions. Differentiating between myelodysplastic syndrome with excessive numbers of blast cells and myelodysplastic syndrome with refractory cytopenias was useful in predicting clinical outcome.