Evaluation of protection against virulent bovine viral diarrhea virus type 2 in calves that had maternal antibodies and were vaccinated with a modified-live vaccine

Alicia D. Zimmerman Rural Technologies Inc, 1008 32nd Ave, Brookings, SD 57006.

Search for other papers by Alicia D. Zimmerman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Robin E. Boots Rural Technologies Inc, 1008 32nd Ave, Brookings, SD 57006.

Search for other papers by Robin E. Boots in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Jennifer L. Valli Wyeth Animal Health, 400 Michener Rd, Guelph, ON N1K 1E4, Canada.

Search for other papers by Jennifer L. Valli in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS, DVM
, and
Christopher C. L. Chase Rural Technologies Inc, 1008 32nd Ave, Brookings, SD 57006.
Department of Veterinary Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007.

Search for other papers by Christopher C. L. Chase in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD, DACVM

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the efficacy of an adjuvanted modified-live bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) vaccine against challenge with a virulent type 2 BVDV strain in calves with or without maternal antibodies against the virus.

Design—Challenge study.

Animals—23 crossbred dairy calves.

Procedures—Calves were fed colostrum containing antibodies against BVDV or colostrum without antiBVDV antibodies within 6 hours of birth and again 8 to 12 hours after the first feeding. Calves were vaccinated with a commercial modified-live virus combination vaccine or a sham vaccine at approximately 5 weeks of age and challenged with virulent type 2 BVDV 3.5 months after vaccination. Clinical signs of BVDV infection, development of viremia, and variation in WBC counts were recorded for 14 days after challenge exposure.

Results—Calves that received colostrum free of antiBVDV antibodies and were vaccinated with the sham vaccine developed severe disease (4 of the 7 calves died or were euthanatized). Calves that received colostrum free of anti-BVDV antibodies and were vaccinated and calves that received colostrum with antiBVDV antibodies and were vaccinated developed only mild or no clinical signs of disease.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results indicated that the modified-live virus vaccine induced a strong protective immune response in young calves, even when plasma concentrations of maternal antibody were high. In addition, all vaccinated calves were protected against viral shedding, whereas control calves vaccinated with the sham vaccine shed virus for an extended period of time.

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the efficacy of an adjuvanted modified-live bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) vaccine against challenge with a virulent type 2 BVDV strain in calves with or without maternal antibodies against the virus.

Design—Challenge study.

Animals—23 crossbred dairy calves.

Procedures—Calves were fed colostrum containing antibodies against BVDV or colostrum without antiBVDV antibodies within 6 hours of birth and again 8 to 12 hours after the first feeding. Calves were vaccinated with a commercial modified-live virus combination vaccine or a sham vaccine at approximately 5 weeks of age and challenged with virulent type 2 BVDV 3.5 months after vaccination. Clinical signs of BVDV infection, development of viremia, and variation in WBC counts were recorded for 14 days after challenge exposure.

Results—Calves that received colostrum free of antiBVDV antibodies and were vaccinated with the sham vaccine developed severe disease (4 of the 7 calves died or were euthanatized). Calves that received colostrum free of anti-BVDV antibodies and were vaccinated and calves that received colostrum with antiBVDV antibodies and were vaccinated developed only mild or no clinical signs of disease.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results indicated that the modified-live virus vaccine induced a strong protective immune response in young calves, even when plasma concentrations of maternal antibody were high. In addition, all vaccinated calves were protected against viral shedding, whereas control calves vaccinated with the sham vaccine shed virus for an extended period of time.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 190 0 0
Full Text Views 1316 1130 66
PDF Downloads 243 139 2
Advertisement