Evaluation of protection against virulent bovine viral diarrhea virus type 2 in calves that had maternal antibodies and were vaccinated with a modified-live vaccine

Alicia D. Zimmerman Rural Technologies Inc, 1008 32nd Ave, Brookings, SD 57006.

Search for other papers by Alicia D. Zimmerman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Robin E. Boots Rural Technologies Inc, 1008 32nd Ave, Brookings, SD 57006.

Search for other papers by Robin E. Boots in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Jennifer L. Valli Wyeth Animal Health, 400 Michener Rd, Guelph, ON N1K 1E4, Canada.

Search for other papers by Jennifer L. Valli in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS, DVM
, and
Christopher C. L. Chase Rural Technologies Inc, 1008 32nd Ave, Brookings, SD 57006.
Department of Veterinary Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007.

Search for other papers by Christopher C. L. Chase in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD, DACVM

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the efficacy of an adjuvanted modified-live bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) vaccine against challenge with a virulent type 2 BVDV strain in calves with or without maternal antibodies against the virus.

Design—Challenge study.

Animals—23 crossbred dairy calves.

Procedures—Calves were fed colostrum containing antibodies against BVDV or colostrum without antiBVDV antibodies within 6 hours of birth and again 8 to 12 hours after the first feeding. Calves were vaccinated with a commercial modified-live virus combination vaccine or a sham vaccine at approximately 5 weeks of age and challenged with virulent type 2 BVDV 3.5 months after vaccination. Clinical signs of BVDV infection, development of viremia, and variation in WBC counts were recorded for 14 days after challenge exposure.

Results—Calves that received colostrum free of antiBVDV antibodies and were vaccinated with the sham vaccine developed severe disease (4 of the 7 calves died or were euthanatized). Calves that received colostrum free of anti-BVDV antibodies and were vaccinated and calves that received colostrum with antiBVDV antibodies and were vaccinated developed only mild or no clinical signs of disease.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results indicated that the modified-live virus vaccine induced a strong protective immune response in young calves, even when plasma concentrations of maternal antibody were high. In addition, all vaccinated calves were protected against viral shedding, whereas control calves vaccinated with the sham vaccine shed virus for an extended period of time.

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the efficacy of an adjuvanted modified-live bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) vaccine against challenge with a virulent type 2 BVDV strain in calves with or without maternal antibodies against the virus.

Design—Challenge study.

Animals—23 crossbred dairy calves.

Procedures—Calves were fed colostrum containing antibodies against BVDV or colostrum without antiBVDV antibodies within 6 hours of birth and again 8 to 12 hours after the first feeding. Calves were vaccinated with a commercial modified-live virus combination vaccine or a sham vaccine at approximately 5 weeks of age and challenged with virulent type 2 BVDV 3.5 months after vaccination. Clinical signs of BVDV infection, development of viremia, and variation in WBC counts were recorded for 14 days after challenge exposure.

Results—Calves that received colostrum free of antiBVDV antibodies and were vaccinated with the sham vaccine developed severe disease (4 of the 7 calves died or were euthanatized). Calves that received colostrum free of anti-BVDV antibodies and were vaccinated and calves that received colostrum with antiBVDV antibodies and were vaccinated developed only mild or no clinical signs of disease.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Results indicated that the modified-live virus vaccine induced a strong protective immune response in young calves, even when plasma concentrations of maternal antibody were high. In addition, all vaccinated calves were protected against viral shedding, whereas control calves vaccinated with the sham vaccine shed virus for an extended period of time.

Contributor Notes

Supported by Wyeth Animal Health.

The authors thank Kysa Gilkerson, Stephanie Kuemper, and Tanya Triebwasser for technical assistance and Johanne Elsener for assistance with statistics.

Address correspondence to Dr. Zimmerman.
  • 1

    Ridpath JF, Bolin SR, Dubovi EJ. Segregation of bovine viral diarrhea virus into genotypes. Virology 1994;205:6674.

  • 2

    Kelling CL. Evolution of bovine viral diarrhea virus vaccines. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2004;20:115129.

  • 3

    Brock KV. Strategies for the control and prevention of bovine viral diarrhea virus. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2004;20:171180.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Rush DM, Thurmond MC, Munoz-Zanzi CA, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of postnatal bovine viral diarrhea virus infection in intensively managed dairy heifers. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;219:14261431.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Ellis J, West K, Cortese V, et al. Effect of maternal antibodies on induction and persistence of vaccine-induced immune responses against bovine viral diarrhea virus type II in young calves. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;219:351356.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Munoz-Zanzi CA, Thurmond MC, Johnson WO, et al. Predicted ages of dairy calves when colostrum-derived bovine viral diarrhea virus antibodies would no longer offer protection against disease or interfere with vaccination. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;221:678685.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Morein B, Abusugra I, Blomqvist G. Immunity in neonates. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2002;87:207213.

  • 8

    Fulton RW, Briggs RE, Payton ME, et al. Maternally derived humoral immunity to bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) 1a, BVDV1b, BVDV2, bovine herpes virus-1, parainfluenza-3 virus bovine respiratory syncytial virus, Mannhemia haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida in beef calves, antibody decline by half-life studies and effect on response to vaccination. Vaccine 2004;22:643649.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    van Oirschot JT, Bruschke CJ, van Rijn PA. Vaccination of cattle against bovine viral diarrhoea. Vet Microbiol 1999;64:169183.

  • 10

    Kovarik J, Siegrist C-A. Optimization of vaccine responses in early life: the role of delivery systems and immunomodulators. Immunol Cell Biol 1998;76:222236.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Morein B, Hu K-F, Abusugra I. Current status and potential application of ISCOM's in veterinary medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2004;23:13671382.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Rogan D, Babiuk LA. Novel vaccines from biotechnology. Rev Sci Tech 2005;24:159174.

  • 13

    Mahon BP. The rational design of vaccine adjuvants for mucosal and neonatal immunization. Curr Med Chem 2001;8:10571075.

  • 14

    Carbrey EA, Brown LN, Chow TL. Recommended standard laboratory techniques for diagnosing infectious bovine rhinotracheitis, bovine viral diarrhea and shipping fever (parainfluenza-3). Proc Annu Meet U S Anim Health Assoc 1971;75:629648.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Carmen S, van Dreumel T, Ridpath J, et al. Severe acute bovine viral diarrhea in Ontario, 1993–1995. J Vet Diagn Invest 1998;10:2735.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Chin AC, Lee WD, Murrin KA, et al. Tilmicosin induces apoptosis in bovine peripheral neutrophils in the presence or in the absence of Pasteurella haemolytica and promotes neutrophil phagocytosis by macrophages. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000;44:24652470.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Saliki JT, Fulton RW, Hull SR, et al. Microtiter virus isolation and enzyme immunoassays for detection of bovine viral diarrhea virus in cattle serum. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:803807.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Liebler-Tenorio EM, Habil MV, Ridpath JF, et al. Distribution of viral antigen and development of lesions after experimental infection with highly virulent bovine viral diarrhea virus type 2 in calves. Am J Vet Res 2002;63:15751584.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Kirkpatrick J, Fulton RW, Burge LJ, et al. Passively transferred immunity in newborn calves, rate of antibody decay, and effect on subsequent vaccination with modified live virus vaccine. Bovine Pract 2001;35:4755.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Menanteau-Horta AM, Ames TR, Johnson DW, et al. Effect of maternal antibody upon vaccination with infectious bovine rhinotracheitis and bovine virus diarrhea vaccines. Can J Comp Med 1985;49:1014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Brar JS, Johnson DW, Muscoplat CC, et al. Maternal immunity to infectious bovine rhinotracheitis and bovine viral diarrhea viruses: duration and effect on vaccination in young calves. Am J Vet Res 1978;39:241244.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Ellis JA, Hassard LE, Cortese VS, et al. Effects of perinatal vaccination on humoral and cellular immune responses in cows and young calves. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996;208:393400.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Endsley JJ, Roth JA, Ridpath J, et al. Maternal antibody blocks humoral but not T cell responses to BVDV. Biologicals 2003;31:123125.

  • 24

    Ridpath JE, Neill JD, Endsley J, et al. Effect of passive immunity on the development of a protective immune response against bovine viral diarrhea virus in calves. Am J Vet Res 2003;64:6569.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement