Evaluation of oral rabies vaccination programs for control of rabies epizootics in coyotes and gray foxes: 1995–2003

Thomas J. Sidwa Texas Department of State Health Services, Zoonosis Control Group, 1100 W 49th St, Austin, TX 78756.

Search for other papers by Thomas J. Sidwa in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Pamela J. Wilson Texas Department of State Health Services, Zoonosis Control Group, 1100 W 49th St, Austin, TX 78756.

Search for other papers by Pamela J. Wilson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MEd
,
Guy M. Moore Texas Department of State Health Services, Zoonosis Control Group, 1100 W 49th St, Austin, TX 78756.

Search for other papers by Guy M. Moore in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Ernest H. Oertli Texas Department of State Health Services, Zoonosis Control Group, 1100 W 49th St, Austin, TX 78756.

Search for other papers by Ernest H. Oertli in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD, DACVPM
,
Bradley N. Hicks United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, 1100 W 49th St, Austin, TX 78756.

Search for other papers by Bradley N. Hicks in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BS
,
Rodney E. Rohde Texas State University-San Marcos, Clinical Laboratory Science, 601 University Dr, San Marcos, TX 78666.

Search for other papers by Rodney E. Rohde in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
, and
David H. Johnston Johnston Biotech, 1080 Braemar Ln, Sarnia, ON N7V 3B5, Canada.

Search for other papers by David H. Johnston in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BSc

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the effectiveness of intervention efforts to halt 2 wildlife rabies epizootics from 1995 through 2003, including 9 oral rabies vaccination campaigns for coyotes and 8 oral rabies vaccination campaigns for gray foxes.

Design—Retrospective study.

Animals—98 coyotes during prevaccination surveillance and 963 coyotes and 104 nontarget animals during postvaccination surveillance in south Texas, and 699 gray foxes and 561 nontarget animals during postvaccination surveillance in west-central Texas.

Procedures—A recombinant-virus oral rabies vaccine in edible baits was distributed by aircraft for consumption by coyotes and gray foxes. Bait acceptance was monitored by use of microscopic analysis of tetracycline biomarker in upper canine teeth and associated bone structures in animals collected for surveillance. Serologic responses were monitored by testing sera for rabies virus–neutralizing antibodies by use of the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test. The incidence of rabies in the distribution area was recorded via active and passive surveillance activities; tracking of rabies virus variants in confirmed rabid animals was used to determine the number and type of rabies cases before and after distributions of the vaccine.

Results—The expansion of both epizootics was halted as a result of the vaccine bait program. The number of laboratory-confirmed rabid animals attributable to the domestic dog-coyote rabies virus variant in south Texas declined to 0, whereas the number of laboratory- confirmed rabid animals attributable to the Texas fox rabies virus variant in west-central Texas decreased.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Data indicated that oral rabies vaccination resulted in protective immunity in a sufficient percentage of the target wildlife population to preclude propagation of the disease and provided an effective means of controlling rabies in these species. ( J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;227:785–792)

Abstract

Objective—To evaluate the effectiveness of intervention efforts to halt 2 wildlife rabies epizootics from 1995 through 2003, including 9 oral rabies vaccination campaigns for coyotes and 8 oral rabies vaccination campaigns for gray foxes.

Design—Retrospective study.

Animals—98 coyotes during prevaccination surveillance and 963 coyotes and 104 nontarget animals during postvaccination surveillance in south Texas, and 699 gray foxes and 561 nontarget animals during postvaccination surveillance in west-central Texas.

Procedures—A recombinant-virus oral rabies vaccine in edible baits was distributed by aircraft for consumption by coyotes and gray foxes. Bait acceptance was monitored by use of microscopic analysis of tetracycline biomarker in upper canine teeth and associated bone structures in animals collected for surveillance. Serologic responses were monitored by testing sera for rabies virus–neutralizing antibodies by use of the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test. The incidence of rabies in the distribution area was recorded via active and passive surveillance activities; tracking of rabies virus variants in confirmed rabid animals was used to determine the number and type of rabies cases before and after distributions of the vaccine.

Results—The expansion of both epizootics was halted as a result of the vaccine bait program. The number of laboratory-confirmed rabid animals attributable to the domestic dog-coyote rabies virus variant in south Texas declined to 0, whereas the number of laboratory- confirmed rabid animals attributable to the Texas fox rabies virus variant in west-central Texas decreased.

Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Data indicated that oral rabies vaccination resulted in protective immunity in a sufficient percentage of the target wildlife population to preclude propagation of the disease and provided an effective means of controlling rabies in these species. ( J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;227:785–792)

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 463 0 0
Full Text Views 2796 1899 76
PDF Downloads 476 180 18
Advertisement