Increasing tourniquet number has no effect on amikacin concentration within the radiocarpal joint in horses undergoing intravenous regional limb perfusion

Thomas C. Bergstrom William R. Prichard Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA

Search for other papers by Thomas C. Bergstrom in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Isabelle Kilcoyne Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA

Search for other papers by Isabelle Kilcoyne in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MVB
,
K. Gary Magdesian Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA

Search for other papers by K. Gary Magdesian in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
, and
Jorge E. Nieto Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA

Search for other papers by Jorge E. Nieto in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MVZ, PhD

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether IV regional limb perfusion (IVRLP) performed in the cephalic vein with a wide rubber tourniquet (WRT) applied proximal and distal to the carpus results in a higher peak concentration (Cmax) of amikacin in the radiocarpal joint (RCJ), compared with the Cmax for IVRLP using a single WRT proximal to the carpus.

Animals

7 healthy adult horses.

Procedures

Horses underwent IVRLP using standing sedation with 2 g of amikacin sulfate diluted to 60 mL by use of saline (0.9% NaCl) solution in the cephalic vein with 2 different tourniquet techniques; proximal WRT (P) and proximal and distal WRT (PD). Synovial fluid was collected from the RCJ at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 minutes after IVRLP. Tourniquets were removed after the 30-minute sample was collected. Blood samples from the jugular vein were collected at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 29, and 31 minutes after IVRLP. Amikacin concentration was quantified by a fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Median peak concentration (Cmax) of amikacin and time to maximum drug concentration (Tmax) within the RCJ were determined.

Results

Median peak concentration in the RCJ was 1331.4 μg/mL with technique P and 683.1 μg/mL with technique PD. Median Tmax occurred at 30 minutes with technique P and 25 minutes with technique PD. No significant (Cmax, P = 0.18; Tmax, P = 0.6) difference in amikacin Cmax or Tmax between techniques was detected.

Clinical Relevance

Placement of 2 WRTs offers no advantage to a single proximal WRT when performing IVRLP to deliver maximal amikacin concentrations to the RCJ using IVRLP.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether IV regional limb perfusion (IVRLP) performed in the cephalic vein with a wide rubber tourniquet (WRT) applied proximal and distal to the carpus results in a higher peak concentration (Cmax) of amikacin in the radiocarpal joint (RCJ), compared with the Cmax for IVRLP using a single WRT proximal to the carpus.

Animals

7 healthy adult horses.

Procedures

Horses underwent IVRLP using standing sedation with 2 g of amikacin sulfate diluted to 60 mL by use of saline (0.9% NaCl) solution in the cephalic vein with 2 different tourniquet techniques; proximal WRT (P) and proximal and distal WRT (PD). Synovial fluid was collected from the RCJ at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 minutes after IVRLP. Tourniquets were removed after the 30-minute sample was collected. Blood samples from the jugular vein were collected at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 29, and 31 minutes after IVRLP. Amikacin concentration was quantified by a fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Median peak concentration (Cmax) of amikacin and time to maximum drug concentration (Tmax) within the RCJ were determined.

Results

Median peak concentration in the RCJ was 1331.4 μg/mL with technique P and 683.1 μg/mL with technique PD. Median Tmax occurred at 30 minutes with technique P and 25 minutes with technique PD. No significant (Cmax, P = 0.18; Tmax, P = 0.6) difference in amikacin Cmax or Tmax between techniques was detected.

Clinical Relevance

Placement of 2 WRTs offers no advantage to a single proximal WRT when performing IVRLP to deliver maximal amikacin concentrations to the RCJ using IVRLP.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplementary Table S1 (PDF 125 KB)
    • Supplementary Table S2 (PDF 103 KB)
    • Supplementary Table S3 (PDF 104 KB)
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 172 0 0
Full Text Views 9768 8988 4389
PDF Downloads 568 211 13
Advertisement