Comparison of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia species–specific peptide ELISAs with whole organism–based immunofluorescent assays for serologic diagnosis of anaplasmosis and ehrlichiosis in dogs

Barbara A. Qurollo Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606.

Search for other papers by Barbara A. Qurollo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
Brett A. Stillman Idexx Laboratories Inc, Westbrook, ME 04092.

Search for other papers by Brett A. Stillman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Melissa J. Beall Idexx Laboratories Inc, Westbrook, ME 04092.

Search for other papers by Melissa J. Beall in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Paulette Foster Idexx Laboratories Inc, Westbrook, ME 04092.

Search for other papers by Paulette Foster in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BS
,
Barbara C. Hegarty Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606.

Search for other papers by Barbara C. Hegarty in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MS
,
Edward B. Breitschwerdt Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606.

Search for other papers by Edward B. Breitschwerdt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
, and
Ramaswamy Chandrashekar Idexx Laboratories Inc, Westbrook, ME 04092.

Search for other papers by Ramaswamy Chandrashekar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the performance of 5 synthetic peptide–based ELISAs with that of 3 commercially available immunofluorescent assays (IFAs) for serologic diagnosis of anaplasmosis and ehrlichiosis in dogs.

SAMPLE

A convenience set of 109 serum samples obtained before and at various times after inoculation for 23 dogs that were experimentally infected with Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Anaplasma platys, Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia chaffeensis, or Ehrlichia ewingii and 1 uninfected control dog in previous studies.

PROCEDURES

All serum samples were assessed with 5 synthetic peptide–based ELISAs designed to detect antibodies against A phagocytophilum, A platys, E canis, E chaffeensis, and E ewingii and 3 whole organism–based IFAs designed to detect antibodies against A phagocytophilum, E canis, and E chaffeensis. The species-specific seroreactivity, cross-reactivity with the other tick-borne pathogens (TBPs), and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each assay and compared among assays.

RESULTS

All serum samples obtained from dogs experimentally infected with a TBP yielded positive results on a serologic assay specific for that pathogen. In general, sensitivity was comparable between ELISAs and IFAs and tended to increase with duration after inoculation. Compared with the IFAs, the corresponding ELISAs were highly specific and rarely cross-reacted with antibodies against other TBPs.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Results suggested that peptide-based ELISAs had enhanced specificity relative to whole organism–based IFAs for detection of antibodies against Anaplasma and Ehrlichia spp, which should facilitate accurate diagnosis and may help detect dogs coinfected with multiple TBPs.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the performance of 5 synthetic peptide–based ELISAs with that of 3 commercially available immunofluorescent assays (IFAs) for serologic diagnosis of anaplasmosis and ehrlichiosis in dogs.

SAMPLE

A convenience set of 109 serum samples obtained before and at various times after inoculation for 23 dogs that were experimentally infected with Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Anaplasma platys, Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia chaffeensis, or Ehrlichia ewingii and 1 uninfected control dog in previous studies.

PROCEDURES

All serum samples were assessed with 5 synthetic peptide–based ELISAs designed to detect antibodies against A phagocytophilum, A platys, E canis, E chaffeensis, and E ewingii and 3 whole organism–based IFAs designed to detect antibodies against A phagocytophilum, E canis, and E chaffeensis. The species-specific seroreactivity, cross-reactivity with the other tick-borne pathogens (TBPs), and diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each assay and compared among assays.

RESULTS

All serum samples obtained from dogs experimentally infected with a TBP yielded positive results on a serologic assay specific for that pathogen. In general, sensitivity was comparable between ELISAs and IFAs and tended to increase with duration after inoculation. Compared with the IFAs, the corresponding ELISAs were highly specific and rarely cross-reacted with antibodies against other TBPs.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Results suggested that peptide-based ELISAs had enhanced specificity relative to whole organism–based IFAs for detection of antibodies against Anaplasma and Ehrlichia spp, which should facilitate accurate diagnosis and may help detect dogs coinfected with multiple TBPs.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplementary Table S1 (PDF 190 kb)
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2463 985 160
PDF Downloads 1478 404 27
Advertisement