Evaluation of the repeatability of kinetic and temporospatial gait variables measured with a pressure-sensitive treadmill for dogs

Kirsten A. Häusler 1Zentrum für Tierphysiotherapie, Lambertweg 36, 70565 Stuttgart, Germany.

Search for other papers by Kirsten A. Häusler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Doro Braun 1Zentrum für Tierphysiotherapie, Lambertweg 36, 70565 Stuttgart, Germany.

Search for other papers by Doro Braun in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Nai-Chieh Liu 2Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0ES, England.

Search for other papers by Nai-Chieh Liu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Fran Penrose 3Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0ES, England.

Search for other papers by Fran Penrose in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MEng
,
Michael P. F. Sutcliffe 3Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0ES, England.

Search for other papers by Michael P. F. Sutcliffe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Matthew J. Allen 2Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0ES, England.

Search for other papers by Matthew J. Allen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 VetMB, PhD

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate intrasession and intersession repeatability of measurements for temporospatial and kinetic variables obtained with a pressure-sensitive treadmill designed for gait analysis of dogs.

ANIMALS

16 client-owned dogs.

PROCEDURES

The influence of treadmill speed on accuracy of ground reaction force (GRF) measurements was assessed by simulated gait analysis at 0 to 7.5 km/h with a custom test device. A similar test was performed with 1 client-owned dog ambulating on the treadmill at 5 speeds (3 to 7 km/h) for GRF calculations. Fifteen client-owned dogs were then walked on the treadmill at 3 km/h for collection of temporospatial and kinetic data. Intrasession repeatability was determined by comparing 2 sets of measurements obtained ≤ 2 hours apart. Intersession repeatability was determined by comparing the first set of these measurements with those for a second session ≥ 4 days later. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs; consistency test) and difference ratios were calculated to assess repeatability.

RESULTS

Increases in treadmill speed yielded a mean 9.1% decrease in weight-normalized force data at belt speeds of up to 7.5 km/h for the test device, compared with the value when the treadmill belt was stationary. Results were similar for the dog at increasing treadmill speeds (mean decrease, 12.4%). For temporospatial data, intrasession ICCs were > 0.9 and intersession ICCs ranged from 0.75 to 0.9; for GRFs, intrasession and intersession ICCs ranged from 0.68 to 0.97 and from 0.35 to 0.78, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Repeatability of temporospatial data for healthy dogs was good to excellent; results for kinetic data varied. Further research is needed to investigate use of this system for gait analysis with larger samples of dogs and dogs with lameness.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate intrasession and intersession repeatability of measurements for temporospatial and kinetic variables obtained with a pressure-sensitive treadmill designed for gait analysis of dogs.

ANIMALS

16 client-owned dogs.

PROCEDURES

The influence of treadmill speed on accuracy of ground reaction force (GRF) measurements was assessed by simulated gait analysis at 0 to 7.5 km/h with a custom test device. A similar test was performed with 1 client-owned dog ambulating on the treadmill at 5 speeds (3 to 7 km/h) for GRF calculations. Fifteen client-owned dogs were then walked on the treadmill at 3 km/h for collection of temporospatial and kinetic data. Intrasession repeatability was determined by comparing 2 sets of measurements obtained ≤ 2 hours apart. Intersession repeatability was determined by comparing the first set of these measurements with those for a second session ≥ 4 days later. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs; consistency test) and difference ratios were calculated to assess repeatability.

RESULTS

Increases in treadmill speed yielded a mean 9.1% decrease in weight-normalized force data at belt speeds of up to 7.5 km/h for the test device, compared with the value when the treadmill belt was stationary. Results were similar for the dog at increasing treadmill speeds (mean decrease, 12.4%). For temporospatial data, intrasession ICCs were > 0.9 and intersession ICCs ranged from 0.75 to 0.9; for GRFs, intrasession and intersession ICCs ranged from 0.68 to 0.97 and from 0.35 to 0.78, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Repeatability of temporospatial data for healthy dogs was good to excellent; results for kinetic data varied. Further research is needed to investigate use of this system for gait analysis with larger samples of dogs and dogs with lameness.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 130 0 0
Full Text Views 865 450 41
PDF Downloads 605 258 39
Advertisement