• 1. Bleedorn JA, Dykema JL, Hardie RJ. Minimally invasive surgery in veterinary practice: a 2010 survey of diplomates and residents of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons. Vet Surg 2013;42:635642.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. Mayhew PD. Recent advances in soft tissue minimally invasive surgery. J Small Anim Pract 2014;55:7583.

  • 3. Divers SJ. Exotic mammal diagnostic endoscopy and endosurgery. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 2010;13:255272.

  • 4. Mehler SJ. Minimally invasive surgery techniques in exotic animals. J Exot Pet Med 2011;20:188205.

  • 5. Jiménez Peláez M, Bouvy BM, Dupré GP. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for treatment of unilateral adrenocortical carcinomas: technique, complications, and results in seven dogs. Vet Surg 2008;37:444453.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Mayhew PD, Mehler SJ, Radhakrishnan A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for management of uncomplicated gall bladder mucocele in six dogs. Vet Surg 2008;37:625630.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Miller NA, Van Lue SJ, Rawlings CA. Use of laparoscopic-assisted cryptorchidectomy in dogs and cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004;224:875878, 865.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. Dupré G, Fiorbianco V, Skalicky M, et al. Laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs: comparison between single portal and two-portal access. Vet Surg 2009;38:818824.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. van Nimwegen SA, Kirpensteijn J. Laparoscopic ovariectomy in cats: comparison of laser and bipolar electrocoagulation. J Feline Med Surg 2007;9:397403.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Divers SJ. Endoscopic ovariectomy of exotic mammals using a three-port approach. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 2015;18:401415.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Coleman KA, Monnet E, Johnston M. Single port laparoscopic-assisted overiohysterectomy in three rabbits. J Exot Pet Med 2017;27:2124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Proença LM. Two-portal access laparoscopic ovariectomy using Ligasure Atlas in exotic companion mammals. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract 2015;18:587596.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Kirlum HJ, Heinrich M, Till H. The rabbit model serves as a valuable operative experience and helps to establish new techniques for abdominal and thoracic endosurgery. Pediatr Surg Int 2005;21:9193.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Esposito C, Escolino M, Draghici I, et al. Training models in pediatric minimally invasive surgery: rabbit model versus porcine model: a comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2016;26:7984.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Blobner M, Bogdanski R, Kochs E, et al. Effects of intraabdominally insufflated carbon dioxide and elevated intraabdominal pressure on splanchnic circulation: an experimental study in pigs. Anesthesiology 1998;89:475482.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Jakimowicz J, Stultiëns G, Smulders F. Laparoscopic insufflation of the abdomen reduces portal venous flow. Surg Endosc 1998;12:129132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Gerges FJ, Kanazi GE, Jabbour-Khoury SI. Anesthesia for laparoscopy: a review. J Clin Anesth 2006;18:6778.

  • 18. Sümpelmann R, Schuerholz T, Marx G, et al. Hemodynamic changes during acute elevation of intra-abdominal pressure in rabbits. Paediatr Anaesth 2006;16:12621267.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Vlot J, Wijnen R, Stolker RJ, et al. Optimizing working space in porcine laparoscopy: CT measurement of the effect of intra-abdominal pressure. Surg Endosc 2013;27:16681673.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Mayhew PD, Pascoe PJ, Kass PH, et al. Effects of pneumoperitoneum induced at various pressures on cardiorespiratory function and working space during laparoscopy in cats. Am J Vet Res 2013;74:13401346.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2009.

  • 22. Milovancev M, Townsend KL. Current concepts in minimally invasive surgery of the abdomen. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2015;45:507522.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23. Ishizaki Y, Bandai Y, Shimomura K, et al. Safe intraabdominal pressure of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery. Surgery 1993;114:549554.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24. Coisman JG, Case JB, Shih A, et al. Comparison of surgical variables in cats undergoing single-incision laparoscopic ovariectomy using a LigaSure or extracorporeal suture versus open ovariectomy. Vet Surg 2014;43:3844.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25. van Ramshorst GH, Salih M, Hop WC, et al. Noninvasive assessment of intra-abdominal pressure by measurement of abdominal wall tension. J Surg Res 2011;171:240244.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26. Vlot J, Staals LM, Wijnen RM, et al. Optimizing working space in laparoscopy: CT measurement of the influence of small body size in a porcine model. J Pediatr Surg 2015;50:465471.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27. Vlot J, Wijnen R, Stolker RJ, et al. Optimizing working space in laparoscopy: CT measurement of the effect of pre-stretching of the abdominal wall in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 2014;28:841846.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28. Song C, Alijani A, Frank T, et al. Elasticity of the living abdominal wall in laparoscopic surgery. J Biomech 2006;39:587591.

  • 29. Mama K, de Rezende ML. Anesthesia management of dogs and cats for laparoscopy. In: Fransson BA, Mayhew PD, eds. Small animal laparoscopy and thoracoscopy. Ames, Iowa: John Wiley and Sons, 2015;7580.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30. Krishnakumar S, Tambe P. Entry complications in laparoscopic surgery. J Gynecol Endosc Surg 2009;1:411.

  • 31. Murdock CM, Wolff AJ, Van Geem T. Risk factors for hypercarbia, subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax, and pneumomediastinum during laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:704709.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32. Boscan P, Cochran S, Monnet E, et al. Effect of prolonged general anesthesia with sevoflurane and laparoscopic surgery on gastric and small bowel propulsive motility and pH in dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg 2014;41:7381.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33. Lee HW, Machin H, Adami C. Peri-anaesthetic mortality and non-fatal gastrointestinal complications in pet rabbits: a retrospective study on 210 cases. Vet Anaesth Analg 2018;45:520528.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34. Sammour T, Mittal A, Loveday BP, et al. Systematic review of oxidative stress associated with pneumoperitoneum. Br J Surg 2009;96:836850.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement

Effects of intra-abdominal pressure on laparoscopic working space in domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus)

View More View Less
  • 1 1Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of 3 intra-abdominal pressures (IAPs) on pneumoperitoneal (laparoscopic working space) volume in domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus).

ANIMALS

6 female New Zealand White rabbits.

PROCEDURES

A Latin-square design was used to randomly allocate sequences of 3 IAPs (4, 8, and 12 mm Hg) to each rabbit in a crossover study. Rabbits were anesthetized, subumbilical cannulae were placed, and CT scans were performed to obtain baseline measurements. Each IAP was achieved with CO2 insufflation and maintained for ≥ 15 minutes; CT scans were performed with rabbits in dorsal, left lateral oblique, and right lateral oblique recumbency. The abdomen was desufflated for 5 minutes between treatments (the 3 IAPs). Pneumoperitoneal volumes were calculated from CT measurements with 3-D medical imaging software. Mixed linear regression models evaluated effects of IAP, rabbit position, and treatment order on working space volume.

RESULTS

Mean working space volume at an IAP of 8 mm Hg was significantly greater (a 19% increase) than that at 4 mm Hg, and was significantly greater (a 6.9% increase) at 12 mm Hg than that at 8 mm Hg. Treatment order, but not rabbit position, also had a significant effect on working space. Minor adverse effects reported in other species were observed in some rabbits.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A nonlinear increase in abdominal working space was observed with increasing IAP. Depending on the type of procedure and visual access requirements, IAPs > 8 mm Hg may not provide a clinically important benefit for laparoscopy in rabbits.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of 3 intra-abdominal pressures (IAPs) on pneumoperitoneal (laparoscopic working space) volume in domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus).

ANIMALS

6 female New Zealand White rabbits.

PROCEDURES

A Latin-square design was used to randomly allocate sequences of 3 IAPs (4, 8, and 12 mm Hg) to each rabbit in a crossover study. Rabbits were anesthetized, subumbilical cannulae were placed, and CT scans were performed to obtain baseline measurements. Each IAP was achieved with CO2 insufflation and maintained for ≥ 15 minutes; CT scans were performed with rabbits in dorsal, left lateral oblique, and right lateral oblique recumbency. The abdomen was desufflated for 5 minutes between treatments (the 3 IAPs). Pneumoperitoneal volumes were calculated from CT measurements with 3-D medical imaging software. Mixed linear regression models evaluated effects of IAP, rabbit position, and treatment order on working space volume.

RESULTS

Mean working space volume at an IAP of 8 mm Hg was significantly greater (a 19% increase) than that at 4 mm Hg, and was significantly greater (a 6.9% increase) at 12 mm Hg than that at 8 mm Hg. Treatment order, but not rabbit position, also had a significant effect on working space. Minor adverse effects reported in other species were observed in some rabbits.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A nonlinear increase in abdominal working space was observed with increasing IAP. Depending on the type of procedure and visual access requirements, IAPs > 8 mm Hg may not provide a clinically important benefit for laparoscopy in rabbits.

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Beaufrère (beaufrer@uoguelph.ca).