1. Mair TS, Smith LJ. Survival and complication rates in 300 horses undergoing surgical treatment of colic. Part 1: short-term survival following a single laparotomy. Equine Vet J 2005;37:296–302.
2. Moore JN, Barton MH. Treatment of endotoxemia. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2003;19:681–695.
3. D'Amours D, Desnoyers S, D'Silva I, et al. Poly(ADP-ribosyl) ation reactions in the regulation of nuclear functions. Biochem J 1999;342:249–268.
4. Luo X, Kraus WL. On PAR with PARP: cellular stress signaling through poly(APD-ribose) and PARP-1. Genes Dev 2012;26:417–432.
5. Meyer-Ficca ML, Meyer RG, Jacobson EL, et al. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases: managing genome stability. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2005;37:920–926.
6. Ha HC, Snyder SH. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase is a mediator of necrotic cell death by ATP depletion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:13978–13982.
7. Hong SJ, Dawson TM, Dawson VL. Nuclear and mitochondrial conversations in cell death: PARP-1 and AIF signaling. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2004;25:259–264.
8. Koh DW, Dawson TM, Dawson VL. Mediation of cell death by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1. Pharmacol Res 2005;52:5–14.
9. Cregan SP, Dawson VL, Slack RS. Role of AIF in caspase-dependent and caspase-independent cell death. Oncogene 2004;23:2785–2796.
10. Ditsworth D, Zong WX, Thompson CB. Activation of poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase (PARP-1) induces release of the pro-inflammatory mediator HMGB1 from the nucleus. J Biol Chem 2007;282:17845–17854.
11. Bai P, Virag L. Role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases in the regulation of inflammatory processes. FEBS Lett 2012;586:3771–3777.
12. Di Paola R, Genovese T, Caputi AP, et al. Beneficial effects of 5-aminoisoquinolinone, a novel, potent, water-soluble, inhibitor of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase, in a rat model of splanchnic artery occlusion and reperfusion. Eur J Pharmacol 2004;492:203–210.
13. Di Paola R, Mazzon E, Xu W, et al. Treatment with PARP-1 inhibitors, GPI 15427 or GPI 16539, ameliorates intestinal damage in rat models of colitis and shock. Eur J Pharmacol 2005;527:163–171.
14. Taner AS, Cinel I, Ozer L, et al. Poly(ADP-ribose) synthetase inhibition reduces bacterial translocation in rats after endotoxin challenge. Shock 2001;16:159–162.
15. Jijon HB, Churchill T, Malfair D, et al. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase attenuates inflammation in a model of chronic colitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2000;279:G641–G651.
16. Oliver FJ, Ménissier-de Murcia J, Nacci C, et al. Resistance to endotoxic shock as a consequence of defective NF-kappaB activation in poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 deficient mice. EMBO J 1999;18:4446–4454.
17. Werners AH, Bull S, Fink-Gremmels J. Endotoxaemia: a review with implications for the horse. Equine Vet J 2005;37:371–383.
18. Fidalgo-Carvalho I, Craigo JK, Barnes S, et al. Characterization of an equine macrophage cell line: application to studies of EIAV infection. Vet Microbiol 2009;136:8–19.
19. Morris DD, Moore JN, Fischer K, et al. Endotoxin-induced tumor necrosis factor activity production by equine peritoneal macrophages. Circ Shock 1990;30:229–236.
20. Douglas HF, Southwood LL, Meyer-Ficca ML, et al. The activity and inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 in equine peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) 2015;25:528–537.
21. Sosna J, Voigt S, Mathieu S, et al. TNF-induced necroptosis and PARP-1-mediated necrosis represent distinct routes to programmed necrotic cell death. Cell Mol Life Sci 2014;71:331–348.
22. Madison DL, Stauffer D, Lundblad JR. The PARP inhibitor PJ34 causes a PARP1-independent, p21 dependent mitotic arrest. DNA Repair (Amst) 2011;10:1003–1013.
23. Antolín AA, Jalencas X, Yélamos J, et al. Identification of pim kinases as novel targets for PJ34 with confounding effects in PARP biology. ACS Chem Biol 2012;7:1962–1967.
24. Jagtap P, Soriano FG, Virág L, et al. Novel phenanthridinone inhibitors of poly (adenosine 5′-diphosphate-ribose) synthetase: potent cytoprotective and antishock agents. Crit Care Med 2002;30:1071–1082.
25. Iványi Z, Hauser B, Pittner A, et al. Systemic and hepatosplanchnic hemodynamic and metabolic effects of the PARP inhibitor PJ34 during hyperdynamic porcine endotoxemia. Shock 2003;19:415–421.
26. Goldfarb RD, Marton A, Szabó E, et al. Protective effect of a novel, potent inhibitor of poly(adenosine 5′-diphosphateribose) synthetase in a porcine model of severe bacterial sepsis. Crit Care Med 2002;30:974–980.
27. Veres B, Gallyas, Jr. F, Varbiro G, et al. Decrease of the inflammatory response and induction of the Akt/protein kinase B pathway by poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 inhibitor in endotoxin-induced septic shock. Biochem Pharmacol 2003;65:1373–1382.
28. Veres B, Radnai B, Gallyas F Jr, et al. Regulation of kinase cascades and transcription factors by a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibitor, 4-hydroxyquinazoline, in lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2004;310:247–255.
29. Pacher P, Cziráki A, Mabley JG, et al. Role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activation in endotoxin-induced cardiac collapse in rodents. Biochem Pharmacol 2002;64:1785–1791.
30. Tasatargil A, Dalaklioglu S, Sadan G. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase prevents vascular hyporesponsiveness induced by lipopolysaccharide in isolated rat aorta. Pharmacol Res 2005;51:581–586.
31. Yilmaz B, Sahin P, Ordueri E, et al. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition improves endothelin-1-induced endothelial dysfunction in rat thoracic aorta. Ups J Med Sci 2014;119:215–222.
32. Lobo SM, Orrico SR, Queiroz MM, et al. Pneumonia-induced sepsis and gut injury: effects of a poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor. J Surg Res 2005;129:292–297.
33. Li X, Ling Y, Cao Z, et al. Targeting intestinal epithelial cell-programmed necrosis alleviates tissue injury after intestinal ischemia/reperfusion in rats. J Surg Res 2018;225:108–117.
Advertisement
To evaluate effects of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP1) inhibitors on the production of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) by interferon-γ (IFN-γ)– and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of horses as an in vitro model of inflammation in horses.
1,440 samples of PBMCs from 6 healthy research horses.
From heparinized whole blood samples, PBMC cultures were obtained. An initial dose-response trial on 48 PBMC samples from 2 horses (24 samples each) was used to determine concentrations of IFN-γ and LPS for use as low- and high-level stimulation concentrations. Seventy-two PBMC samples from 6 horses were assigned equally to 1 of 4 PARP1 inhibition categories: no PARP1 inhibitor (PARP1 inhibition control); 2-((R)-2-methylpyrrolidin-2-yl)-1H-benzimidazole-4-carbozamide dihydrochloride (ABT888);4-(3-(1-(cyclopropanecarbonyl)piperazine-4-carbonyl)-4-fluorobenzyl)phthalazin-1(2H)-one (AZD2281); or N-(6-oxo-5,6-dihydrophenanthridin-2-yl) -N,N-dimethylacetamide hydrochloride (PJ34). Samples of PBMCs from each horse and each PARP1 inhibition category were then assigned to 1 of 3 levels of IFN-γ and LPS stimulation: none (control), low stimulation, or high stimulation. After a 24-hour incubation period, a TNF-α ELISA was used to measure TNF-α concentration in the supernatant. Results were compared across treatments and for each horse. Data were analyzed with repeated-measures ANOVA.
Median TNF-α concentration was significantly lower for PJ34-treated, high-level stimulated PBMCs than for PARP1 inhibition control, high-level stimulated PBMCs; however, no other meaningful differences in TNF-α concentration were detected among the inhibition and stimulation combinations.
Findings suggested that PJ34 PARP1 inhibition may reduce TNF-α production in horses, a potential benefit in reducing inflammation and endotoxin-induced damage in horses.
Drs. Meyer-Ficca and Meyer's present address is Department of Animal, Dairy, and Veterinary Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322.
Drs. Cacciolatti and Zarucco contributed equally to the study.