Assessment of the administration of maropitant and loperamide to dogs with cancer for the prevention and reduction of adverse effects associated with the administration of paclitaxel

Juan C. Cartagena-Albertus 1Animal Blue Care, Autovía A7 Km 204, 29649 Mijas Costa, Spain.
2Vets4pets Worcester, Blackpole Retail Park, Blackpole Rd, Worcester WR3 8PQ, England.
3Northlands Veterinary Hospital, 2 Northampton Rd, Kettering NN15 7JU, England.
4Departamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de los Alimentos, Campus Universitario de Arucas–Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canarias, 35416 Arucas, Spain.

Search for other papers by Juan C. Cartagena-Albertus in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Javier Engel Manchado 1Animal Blue Care, Autovía A7 Km 204, 29649 Mijas Costa, Spain.

Search for other papers by Javier Engel Manchado in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Antoaneta Moise 2Vets4pets Worcester, Blackpole Retail Park, Blackpole Rd, Worcester WR3 8PQ, England.
3Northlands Veterinary Hospital, 2 Northampton Rd, Kettering NN15 7JU, England.
5Vetersalud Veterinary Hospital Dr. Moya, Avda Joan Miró, 40 29620 Torremolinos, Spain.

Search for other papers by Antoaneta Moise in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Sergio Moya García 1Animal Blue Care, Autovía A7 Km 204, 29649 Mijas Costa, Spain.
5Vetersalud Veterinary Hospital Dr. Moya, Avda Joan Miró, 40 29620 Torremolinos, Spain.

Search for other papers by Sergio Moya García in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
, and
Jose A. Montoya Alonso 4Departamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de los Alimentos, Campus Universitario de Arucas–Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canarias, 35416 Arucas, Spain.

Search for other papers by Jose A. Montoya Alonso in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of maropitant and loperamide for the prevention and reduction of adverse gastrointestinal effects associated with administration of paclitaxel to dogs with cancer.

ANIMALS

168 dogs with cancer.

PROCEDURES

The study comprised 2 phases. For phase 1, dogs in the intervention group were administered maropitant and loperamide followed by paclitaxel. Outcomes were compared with those for a control group that received only maropitant and paclitaxel. For phase 2, all dogs of phase 1 that did not receive maropitant and loperamide and that had adverse gastrointestinal effects were enrolled; they received maropitant and loperamide and another dose of paclitaxel.

RESULTS

In phase 1, significantly fewer dogs in the intervention group had adverse effects. For dogs that had adverse effects, the intervention group had a lower severity of lack of appetite and lethargy. Also, adverse effects for dogs in the intervention group were of significantly shorter duration than for the control group. In phase 2, significant reductions in adverse effects were observed after administration of maropitant and loperamide. In those dogs that still had adverse effects after administration of maropitant and loperamide, there was a significant reduction in severity of signs of nausea and lethargy.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A combination of maropitant and loperamide was found to be safe for use and effective for reducing or preventing signs of paclitaxel-induced gastrointestinal effects in dogs.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of maropitant and loperamide for the prevention and reduction of adverse gastrointestinal effects associated with administration of paclitaxel to dogs with cancer.

ANIMALS

168 dogs with cancer.

PROCEDURES

The study comprised 2 phases. For phase 1, dogs in the intervention group were administered maropitant and loperamide followed by paclitaxel. Outcomes were compared with those for a control group that received only maropitant and paclitaxel. For phase 2, all dogs of phase 1 that did not receive maropitant and loperamide and that had adverse gastrointestinal effects were enrolled; they received maropitant and loperamide and another dose of paclitaxel.

RESULTS

In phase 1, significantly fewer dogs in the intervention group had adverse effects. For dogs that had adverse effects, the intervention group had a lower severity of lack of appetite and lethargy. Also, adverse effects for dogs in the intervention group were of significantly shorter duration than for the control group. In phase 2, significant reductions in adverse effects were observed after administration of maropitant and loperamide. In those dogs that still had adverse effects after administration of maropitant and loperamide, there was a significant reduction in severity of signs of nausea and lethargy.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A combination of maropitant and loperamide was found to be safe for use and effective for reducing or preventing signs of paclitaxel-induced gastrointestinal effects in dogs.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 165 0 0
Full Text Views 20714 19709 345
PDF Downloads 969 408 51
Advertisement