• 1. Budsberg SC, Verstraete MC, Soutas-Little RW. Force plate analysis of the walking gait in healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 1987;48:915918.

  • 2. Budsberg SC, Verstraete MC, Brown J, et al. Vertical loading rates in clinically normal dogs at a trot. Am J Vet Res 1995;56:12751280.

  • 3. Budsberg SC, Rytz U, Johnston SA. Effects of acceleration on ground reaction forces collected in healthy dogs at a trot. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1999;12:1519.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Yanoff SR, Hulse DA, Hogan HA. Measurements of vertical ground reaction force in jumping dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1992;5:4450.

  • 5. Budsberg SC, Verstraete MC, Soutas-Little RW, et al. Force plate analyses before and after stabilization of canine stifles for cruciate injury. Am J Vet Res 1988;49:15221524.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Vasseur PB, Johnson AL, Budsberg SC, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of the efficacy of carprofen, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, in the treatment of osteoarthritis in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995;206:807811.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Kennedy S, Lee DV, Bertram JE, et al. Gait evaluation in hip osteoarthritis and normal dogs using a serial force plate system. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003;16:170177.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. Hoelzler MG, Millis DL, Francis DA, et al. Results of arthroscopic versus open arthrotomy for surgical management of cranial cruciate ligament deficiency in dogs. Vet Surg 2004;33:146153.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. Bertram JE, Lee DV, Case HN, et al. Comparison of the trotting gaits of Labrador Retrievers and Greyhounds. Am J Vet Res 2000;61:832838.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Lascelles BD, Roe SC, Smith E, et al. Evaluation of a pressure walkway system for measurement of vertical limb forces in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res 2006;67:277282.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Kirtley C. Chapter 1: the temporal-spatial parameters. In: Clinical gait analysis. Edinburgh: Elsevier, 2006;1537.

  • 12. Light VA, Steiss JE, Montgomery RD, et al. Temporal-spatial gait analysis by use of a portable walkway system in healthy Labrador Retrievers at a walk. Am J Vet Res 2010;71:9971002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Besancon MF, Conzemius MG, Derrick TR, et al. Comparison of vertical forces in normal greyhounds between force platform and pressure walkway measurement systems. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003;16:153157.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Horstman CL, Conzemius MG, Evans R, et al. Assessing the efficacy of perioperative oral carprofen after cranial cruciate surgery using noninvasive, objective pressure platform gait analysis. Vet Surg 2004;33:286292.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15. Lascelles BD, Freire M, Roe SC, et al. Evaluation of functional outcome after BFX total hip replacement using a pressure sensitive walkway. Vet Surg 2010;39:7177.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Tekscan Walkway user manual. Boston, Mass: Tekscan, 2010.

  • 17. American Association of Equine Practitioners. Lameness exams: Evaluating the lame horse. Available at: aaep.org/horsehealth/lameness-exams-evaluating-lame-horse. Accessed Jul 15, 2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Evans R, Horstman C, Conzemius M. Accuracy and optimization of force platform gait analysis in Labradors with cranial cruciate disease evaluated at a walking gait. Vet Surg 2005;34:445449.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Gillette RL, Angle TC. Recent developments in canine locomotor analysis: a review. Vet J 2008;178:165176.

  • 20. Oosterlinck M, Pille F, Huppes T, et al. Comparison of pressure plate and force plate gait kinetics in sound Warmbloods at walk and trot. Vet J 2010;186:347351.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement

Comparison of three walkway cover types for use during objective canine gait analysis with a pressure-sensitive walkway

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
  • | 2 Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
  • | 3 Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65212.
  • | 4 Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of 3 walkway cover types on temporospatial and ground reaction force measurements of dogs during gait analysis with a pressure-sensitive walkway (PSW).

ANIMALS 35 client- and staff-owned dogs (25 nonlame and 10 lame).

PROCEDURES In a crossover study design, all dogs were evaluated at a comfortable walk on a PSW to which 3 cover types (a 0.32-cm-thick corrugated vinyl mat or a 0.32- or 0.64-cm-thick polyvinyl chloride yoga mat) were applied in random order. Temporospatial and ground reaction force measurements were obtained and compared among cover types within the nonlame and lame dog groups.

RESULTS Several variables, including maximum peak pressure, maximum force (absolute and normalized as a percentage of body weight), and vertical impulse (absolute and normalized) differed significantly in most comparisons among cover types for both nonlame and lame dogs. There was no significant difference in maximum force values between the 0.32-cm-thick corrugated vinyl and 0.64-cm-thick polyvinyl chloride cover types for both nonlame and lame dogs.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE To the authors’ knowledge, the cover type used during data collection with a PSW is rarely provided in published reports on this topic. The findings in this study suggested that to ensure that PSW data for dogs are collected in a standardized manner, the same cover type should be used during follow-up visits to evaluate clinical outcomes, for the duration of research studies, and at all locations for multi-institutional studies. The cover type should be specified in future PSW studies to allow direct comparisons of findings between studies.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Kieves’ present address is Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Dr. Hart's present address is Cornell University Veterinary Specialists, 880 Canal St, Stamford, CT 06902.

Address correspondence to Dr. Kieves (nkieves@gmail.com).