Evaluation of the geometric accuracy of computed tomography and microcomputed tomography of the articular surface of the distal portion of the radius of cats

Caroline E. Webster 1Edward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.

Search for other papers by Caroline E. Webster in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
,
Denis J. Marcellin-Little 3Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607.

Search for other papers by Denis J. Marcellin-Little in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DEDV
,
Erin M. Koballa 3Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607.

Search for other papers by Erin M. Koballa in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Jonathan W. Stallrich 2Department of Statistics, College of Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.

Search for other papers by Jonathan W. Stallrich in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD
, and
Ola L. A. Harrysson 1Edward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, College of Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.

Search for other papers by Ola L. A. Harrysson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 PhD

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate accuracy of articular surfaces determined by use of 2 perpendicular CT orientations, micro-CT, and laser scanning.

SAMPLE

23 cat cadavers.

PROCEDURES

Images of antebrachia were obtained by use of CT (voxel size, 0.6 mm) in longitudinal orientation (CTLO images) and transverse orientation (CTTO images) and by use of micro-CT (voxel size, 0.024 mm) in a longitudinal orientation. Images were reconstructed. Craniocaudal and mediolateral length, radius of curvature, and deviation of the articular surface of the distal portion of the radius of 3-D renderings for CTLO, CTTO, and micro-CT images were compared with results of 3-D renderings acquired with a laser scanner (resolution, 0.025 mm).

RESULTS

Measurement of CTLO and CTTO images overestimated craniocaudal and mediolateral length of the articular surface by 4% to 10%. Measurement of micro-CT images underestimated craniocaudal and mediolateral length by 1%. Measurement of CTLO and CTTO images underestimated mediolateral radius of curvature by 15% and overestimated craniocaudal radius of curvature by > 100%; use of micro-CT images underestimated them by 3% and 5%, respectively. Mean ± SD surface deviation was 0.26 ± 0.09 mm for CTLO images, 0.30 ± 0.28 mm for CTTO images, and 0.04 ± 0.02 mm for micro-CT images.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Articular surface models derived from CT images had dimensional errors that approximately matched the voxel size. Thus, CT cannot be used to plan conforming arthroplasties in small joints and could lack precision when used to plan the correction of a limb deformity or repair of a fracture.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate accuracy of articular surfaces determined by use of 2 perpendicular CT orientations, micro-CT, and laser scanning.

SAMPLE

23 cat cadavers.

PROCEDURES

Images of antebrachia were obtained by use of CT (voxel size, 0.6 mm) in longitudinal orientation (CTLO images) and transverse orientation (CTTO images) and by use of micro-CT (voxel size, 0.024 mm) in a longitudinal orientation. Images were reconstructed. Craniocaudal and mediolateral length, radius of curvature, and deviation of the articular surface of the distal portion of the radius of 3-D renderings for CTLO, CTTO, and micro-CT images were compared with results of 3-D renderings acquired with a laser scanner (resolution, 0.025 mm).

RESULTS

Measurement of CTLO and CTTO images overestimated craniocaudal and mediolateral length of the articular surface by 4% to 10%. Measurement of micro-CT images underestimated craniocaudal and mediolateral length by 1%. Measurement of CTLO and CTTO images underestimated mediolateral radius of curvature by 15% and overestimated craniocaudal radius of curvature by > 100%; use of micro-CT images underestimated them by 3% and 5%, respectively. Mean ± SD surface deviation was 0.26 ± 0.09 mm for CTLO images, 0.30 ± 0.28 mm for CTTO images, and 0.04 ± 0.02 mm for micro-CT images.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Articular surface models derived from CT images had dimensional errors that approximately matched the voxel size. Thus, CT cannot be used to plan conforming arthroplasties in small joints and could lack precision when used to plan the correction of a limb deformity or repair of a fracture.

Contributor Notes

Dr. Marcellin-Little's present address is Department of Veterinary Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616.

Dr. Koballa's present address is North Mecklenburg Animal Hospital, 19126 Statesville Rd, Cornelius, NC 28031.

Address correspondence to Dr. Marcellin-Little (djmarcel@ucdavis.edu).
  • 1. Hui C, Pi Y, Swami V, et al. A validation study of a novel 3-dimensional MRI modeling technique to identify the anatomic insertions of the anterior cruciate ligament. Orthop J Sports Med 2016;4:2325967116673797.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2. Chang EY, Moses DA, Babb JS, et al. Shoulder impingement: objective 3D shape analysis of acromial morphologic features. Radiology 2006;239:497505.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Prevrhal S, Fox JC, Shepherd JA, et al. Accuracy of CT-based thickness measurement of thin structures: modeling of limited spatial resolution in all three dimensions. Med Phys 2003;30:18.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Viegas SF, Hillman GR, Elder K, et al. Measurement of carpal bone geometry by computer analysis of three-dimensional CT images. J Hand Surg Am 1993;18:341349.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5. Lalone EA, Willing RT, Shannon HL, et al. Accuracy assessment of 3D bone reconstructions using CT: an intro comparison. Med Eng Phys 2015;37:729738.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Zhang ZL, Cheng JG, Li G, et al. Detection accuracy of condylar bony defects in Promax 3D cone beam CT images scanned with different protocols. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013;42:20120241.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7. Bois AJ, Fening SD, Polster J, et al. Quantifying glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder instability: reliability and accuracy of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional computed tomography measurement techniques. Am J Sports Med 2012;40:25692577.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. Fitzwater KL, Marcellin-Little DJ, Harrysson OLA, et al. Evaluation of the effect of computed tomography scan protocols and freeform fabrication methods on bone biomodel accuracy. Am J Vet Res 2011;72:11781185.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. Pinto JM, Arrieta C, Andia ME, et al. Sensitivity analysis of geometric errors in additive manufacturing medical models. Med Eng Phys 2015;37:328334.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10. Chen X, Zimmerman BK, Lu XL. Determine the equilibrium mechanical properties of articular cartilage from the short-term indentation response. J Biomech 2015;48:176180.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11. Varga P, Schefzig P, Unger E, et al. Finite element based estimation of contact areas and pressures of the human scaphoid in various functional positions of the hand. J Biomech 2013;46:984990.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Márquez-Florez K, Vergara-Amador E, de Las Casas EB, et al. Theoretical distribution of load in the radius and ulna carpal joint. Comput Biol Med 2015;60:100106.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13. Majors BJ, Wayne JS. Development and validation of a computational model for investigation of wrist biomechanics. Ann Biomed Eng 2011;39:28072815.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Klennert BJ, Ellis BJ, Maak TG, et al. The mechanics of focal chondral defects in the hip. J Biomech 2017;52:3137.

  • 15. Hui-Hui W, Dong W, An-Bang M, et al. Hip joint geometry effects on cartilage contact stresses during a gait cycle. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2016;2016:60386041.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Katz MA, Beredjiklian PK, Bozentka DJ, et al. Computed tomography scanning of intra-articular distal radius fractures: does it influence treatment? J Hand Surg Am 2001;26:415421.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Leventhal EL, Wolfe SW, Moore DC, et al. Interfragmentary motion in patients with scaphoid nonunion. J Hand Surg Am 2008;33:11081115.

  • 18. Márquez-Florez K, Vergara-Amador E, Gavilan-Alfonso M, et al. Load distribution on the radio-carpal joint for carpal arthrodesis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2016;127:204215.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Soslowsky LJ, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU, et al. Articular geometry of the glenohumeral joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992;285:181190.

  • 20. Breit S, Pfeiffer K, Pichler R. Use of a 3D laser scan technique to compare the surface geometry of the medial coronoid process in dogs affected with medial compartment disease with unaffected controls. Vet J 2010;185:285291.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. Wilson LAB, Humphrey LT. A virtual geometric morphometric approach to the quantification of long bone bilateral asymmetry and cross-sectional shape. Am J Phys Anthropol 2015;158:541556.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Trinh NH, Lester J, Fleming BC, et al. Accurate measurement of cartilage morphology using a 3D laser scanner. In: Beichel RR, Sonka M, eds. Computer vision approaches to medical image analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2006;3748.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23. DeVries NA, Gassman EE, Kallemeyn NA, et al. Validation of phalanx bone three-dimensional surface segmentation from computed tomography images using laser scanning. Skeletal Radiol 2008;37:3542.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24. Aubin , Dansereau J, Parent F, et al. Morphometric evaluations of personalised 3D reconstructions and geometric models of the human spine. Med Biol Eng Comput 1997;35:611618.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25. Clark JM, Huber JD. The structure of the human subchondral plate. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990;72:866873.

  • 26. Dunlap AE, Mathews KG, Walters BL, et al. Three-dimensional assessment of the influence of juvenile pubic symphysiodesis on the pelvic geometry of dogs. Am J Vet Res 2018;79:12171225.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27. Harris WH, Rushfeldt PD, Carlson CE, et al. Pressure distribution in the hip and selection of hemiarthroplasty, in Proceedings. 3rd Open Sci Meet Hip Soc, 1975;9398.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28. Baratz ME, Des Jardins J, Anderson DD, et al. Displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius: the effect of fracture displacement on contact stresses in a cadaver model. J Hand Surg Am 1996;21:183188.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29. Van Dessel J, Nicolielo LF, Huang Y, et al. Quantification of bone quality using different cone beam computed tomography devices: accuracy assessment for edentulous human mandibles. Eur J Oral Implantol 2016;9:411424.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30. Cao Q, Zbijewski W, Sisniega A, et al. Multiresolution iterative reconstruction in high-resolution extremity cone-beam CT. Phys Med Biol 2016;61:72637281.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31. Liptak JM, Dernell WS, Ehrhart N, et al. Cortical allograft and endoprosthesis for limb-sparing surgery in dogs with distal radial osteosarcoma: a prospective clinical comparison of two different limb-sparing techniques. Vet Surg 2006;35:518533.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32. Herzberg G, Burnier M, Marc A, et al. Primary wrist hemiarthroplasty for irreparable distal radius fracture in the independent elderly. J Wrist Surg 2015;4:156163.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33. Beckmann J, Stengel D, Tingart M, et al. Navigated cup implantation in hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2009;80:538544.

  • 34. Ast MP, Nam D, Haas SB. Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a review. Orthop Clin North Am 2012;43:e17e22.

  • 35. Cohnen M, Poll LW, Puettmann C, et al. Effective doses in standard protocols for multi-slice CT scanning. Eur Radiol 2003;13:11481153.

  • 36. Brooks RA, Chiro GD. Beam hardening in x-ray reconstructive tomography. Phys Med Biol 1976;21:390398.

  • 37. Joseph PM, Ruth C. A method for simultaneous correction of spectrum hardening artifacts in CT images containing both bone and iodine. Med Phys 1997;24:16291634.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38. Tan Y, Kiekens K, Welkenhuyzen F, et al. Simulation-aided investigation of beam hardening induced errors in CT dimensional metrology. Meas Sci Technol 2014;25;064014.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39. Zhang X, Li L, Zhang F, et al. Improving the accuracy of CT dimensional metrology by a novel beam hardening correction method. Meas Sci Technol 2015;26:111.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40. Krumm M, Kasperl S, Franz M. Reducing non-linear artifacts of multi-material objects in industrial 3D computed tomography. NDT Int 2008;41:242251.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41. Kohonen I, Koivu H, Vahlberg T, et al. Total ankle arthroplasty: optimizing computed tomography imaging protocol. Skeletal Radiol 2013;42:15071513.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42. Rathnayaka K, Sahama T, Schuetz MA, et al. Effects of CT image segmentation methods on the accuracy of long bone 3D reconstructions. Med Eng Phys 2011;33:226233.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43. Eggers G, Klein J, Welzel T, et al. Geometric accuracy of digital volume tomography and conventional computed tomography. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;46:639644.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44. Van den Broeck J, Vereecke E, Wirix-Speetjens R, et al. Segmentation accuracy of long bones. Med Eng Phys 2014;36:949953.

  • 45. McCann L, Ingham E, Jin Z, et al. An investigation of the effect of conformity of knee hemiarthroplasty designs on contact stress, friction and degeneration of articular cartilage: a tribological study. J Biomech 2009;42:13261331.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement