Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of oral transmucosal and intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine in dogs

Brian T. Dent 1Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Search for other papers by Brian T. Dent in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM
,
Turi K. Aarnes 1Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Search for other papers by Turi K. Aarnes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
Vincent A. Wavreille 1Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Search for other papers by Vincent A. Wavreille in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
,
Jeffrey Lakritz 1Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Search for other papers by Jeffrey Lakritz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Phillip Lerche 1Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Search for other papers by Phillip Lerche in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 BVSc, PhD
,
Butch KuKanich 2Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Institute of Computational Comparative Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.

Search for other papers by Butch KuKanich in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, PhD
,
Carolina H. Riccó Pereira 1Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Search for other papers by Carolina H. Riccó Pereira in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS
, and
Richard M. Bednarski 1Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.

Search for other papers by Richard M. Bednarski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 DVM, MS

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the injectable formulation of dexmedetomidine administered via the oral transmucosal (OTM) route to healthy dogs.

ANIMALS

6 healthy dogs.

PROCEDURES

Injectable dexmedetomidine was administered IV (5 μg/kg) or via the OTM route (20 μg/kg) in a blinded, single-observer, randomized crossover study. Dogs received dexmedetomidine and a sham treatment at each administration. Serial blood samples were collected from a catheter in a saphenous vein. Heart rate, respiratory rate, and subjective sedation score were assessed for 24 hours after administration. Plasma samples were analyzed for dexmedetomidine concentrations by use of ultraperformance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

For the OTM route, the mean ± SD maximum plasma concentration was 3.8 ± 1.3 ng/mL, which was detected 73 ± 33 minutes after administration. The mean maximum concentration for the IV dose, when extrapolated to the time of administration, was 18.6 ± 3.3 ng/mL. The mean terminal-phase half-life was 152 ± 146 minutes and 36 ± 6 minutes for OTM and IV administration, respectively. After IV administration, total clearance was 8.0 ± 1.6 mL/min/kg and volume of distribution at steady state was 371 ± 72 mL/kg. Bioavailability for OTM administration of dexmedetomidine was 11.2 ± 4.5%. Peak sedation scores did not differ significantly between routes of administration. Decreases in heart rate, respiratory rate, and peak sedation score were evident sooner after IV administration.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

OTM administration of the injectable formulation of dexmedetomidine resulted in a similar degree of sedation and prolonged duration of action, compared with results for IV administration, despite relatively low bioavailability.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the injectable formulation of dexmedetomidine administered via the oral transmucosal (OTM) route to healthy dogs.

ANIMALS

6 healthy dogs.

PROCEDURES

Injectable dexmedetomidine was administered IV (5 μg/kg) or via the OTM route (20 μg/kg) in a blinded, single-observer, randomized crossover study. Dogs received dexmedetomidine and a sham treatment at each administration. Serial blood samples were collected from a catheter in a saphenous vein. Heart rate, respiratory rate, and subjective sedation score were assessed for 24 hours after administration. Plasma samples were analyzed for dexmedetomidine concentrations by use of ultraperformance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

For the OTM route, the mean ± SD maximum plasma concentration was 3.8 ± 1.3 ng/mL, which was detected 73 ± 33 minutes after administration. The mean maximum concentration for the IV dose, when extrapolated to the time of administration, was 18.6 ± 3.3 ng/mL. The mean terminal-phase half-life was 152 ± 146 minutes and 36 ± 6 minutes for OTM and IV administration, respectively. After IV administration, total clearance was 8.0 ± 1.6 mL/min/kg and volume of distribution at steady state was 371 ± 72 mL/kg. Bioavailability for OTM administration of dexmedetomidine was 11.2 ± 4.5%. Peak sedation scores did not differ significantly between routes of administration. Decreases in heart rate, respiratory rate, and peak sedation score were evident sooner after IV administration.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

OTM administration of the injectable formulation of dexmedetomidine resulted in a similar degree of sedation and prolonged duration of action, compared with results for IV administration, despite relatively low bioavailability.

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to Dr. Aarnes (aarnes.1@osu.edu).
  • 1. Beaver BV. Owner complaints about canine behavior. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1994;204:19531955.

  • 2. Salman MD, Hutchison J, Ruch-Gallie R, et al. Behavioral reasons for relinquishment of dogs and cats to 12 shelters. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2000;3:93106.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3. Beaver BV. Introduction to canine behavior. In: Canine behavior: a guide for veterinarians. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1999;142.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4. Döring D, Roscher A, Scheipl F, et al. Fear-related behaviour of dogs in veterinary practice. Vet J 2009;182:3843.

  • 5. Robertson SA, Lascelles BDX, Taylor PM, et al. PK-PD modeling of buprenorphine in cats: intravenous and oral transmucosal administration. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2005;28:453460.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6. Robertson SA, Taylor PM, Sear JW. Systemic uptake of buprenorphine by cats after oral mucosal administration. Vet Rec 2003;152:675678.

  • 7. Dimaio Knych HK, Stanley SD. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of detomidine following sublingual administration to horses. Am J Vet Res 2011;72:13781385.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8. Gruen ME, Sherman BL. Use of trazodone as an adjunctive agent in the treatment of canine anxiety disorders: 56 cases (1995–2007). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008;233:19021907.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9. Simpson BS. Canine communication. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1997;27:445464.

  • 10. Dexmedetomidine (dexmedetomidine hydrochloride) injectable 0.5 mg/mL [package insert]. Kalamazoo, Mich; Zoetis Inc, 2015.

  • 11. Zub D, Berkenbosch JW, Tobias JD. Preliminary experience with oral dexmedetomidine for procedural and anesthetic premedication. Paediatr Anaesth 2005;15:932938.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12. Sakurai Y, Obata T, Odaka A, et al. Buccal administration of dexmedetomidine as a preanesthetic in children. J Anesth 2010;24:4953.

  • 13. Karaaslan D, Peker TT, Alaca A, et al. Comparison of buccal and intramuscular dexmedetomidine premedication for arthroscopic knee surgery. J Clin Anesth 2006;18:589593.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14. Dart CM. Advantages and disadvantages of using alpha-2 agonists in veterinary practice. Aust Vet J 1999;77:720721.

  • 15. Murrell JC, Hellebrekers LJ. Medetomidine and dexmedetomidine: a review of cardiovascular effects and antinociceptive properties in the dog. Vet Anaesth Analg 2005;32:117127.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16. Porters N, Bosmans T, Debille M, et al. Sedative and antinociceptive effects of dexmedetomidine and buprenorphine after oral transmucosal or intramuscular administration in cats. Vet Anaesth Analg 2014;41:9096.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17. Slingsby LS, Taylor PM, Monroe T. Thermal antinociception after dexmedetomidine administration in cats: a comparison between intramuscular and oral transmucosal administration. J Feline Med Surg 2009;11:829834.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18. Santos LC, Ludders JW, Erb HN, et al. Sedative and cardiorespiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and buprenorphine administered to cats via oral transmucosal or intramuscular routes. Vet Anaesth Analg 2010;37:417424.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19. Messenger KM, Hopfensperger M, Knych HK, et al. Pharmacokinetics of detomidine following intravenous or oral-transmucosal administration and sedative effects of the oral-transmucosal treatment in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2016;77:413420.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20. Vettorato E, Bacco S. A comparison of the sedative and analgesic properties of pethidine (meperidine) and butorphanol in dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2011;52:426432.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21. Gurney M, Cripps P, Mosing M. Subcutaneous pre-anaesthetic medication with acepromazine-buprenorphine is effective as and less painful than the intramuscular route. J Small Anim Pract 2009;50:474477.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22. Anttila M, Penttilä J, Helminen A, et al. Bioavailability of dexmedetomidine after extravascular doses in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2003;56:691693.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23. Kuusela E, Raekallio M, Anttila M, et al. Clinical effects and pharmacokinetics of medetomidine and its enantiomers in dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2000;23:1520.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24. Toutain PL, Bousquet-Mélou A. Plasma terminal half-life. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2004;27:427439.

  • 25. Zhang H, Zhang J, Streisand JB. Oral mucosal drug delivery. Clin Pharmacokinet 2002;41:661680.

  • 26. Baliga S, Muglikar S, Kale R. Salivary pH: a diagnostic biomarker. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2013;17:461465.

  • 27. Iacopetti I, Perazzi A, Badon T, et al. Salivary pH, calcium, phosphorus and selected enzymes in healthy dogs: a pilot study. BMC Vet Res 2017;13:330337.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28. Lavy E, Goldberger D, Friedman M, et al. pH values and mineral content of saliva in different breeds of dogs. Isr J Vet Med 2012;67:244248.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29. Hooda R, Tripathi M, Kapoor K. A review of oral mucosal drug delivery system. Pharm Innov 2012;1:1320.

  • 30. Ansah OB, Raekallio M, Vainio O. Comparing oral and intramuscular administration of medetomidine in cats. Vet Anaesth Analg 1998;25:4146.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31. Hopfensperger MJ, Messenger KM, Papich MG, et al. The use of oral transmucosal detomidine hydrochloride gel to facilitate handling in dogs. J Vet Behav 2013;8:114123.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32. Cohen AE, Bennett SL. Oral transmucosal administration of dexmedetomidine for sedation in 4 dogs. Can Vet J 2015;56:11441148.

  • 33. Korpivaara M, Laapas K, Huhtinen M, et al. Dexmedetomidine oromucosal gel for noise-associated acute anxiety and fear in dogs—a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study. Vet Rec 2017;180:356362.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34. Granholm M, McKusick BC, Westerholm FC, et al. Evaluation of the clinical efficacy and safety of intramuscular and intravenous doses of dexmedetomidine and medetomidine in dogs and their reversal with atipamezole. Vet Rec 2007;160:891897.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35. Fleischer S, Sharkey M, Mealey K, et al. Pharmacogenetic and metabolic differences between dog breeds: their impact on canine medicine and the use of the dog as a preclinical animal model. AAPS J 2008;10:110119.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Advertisement